Dismissed¶37

C. Sham Rao v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC16 Jul 2025WP/29956/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

C. Sham Rao v. State of Telangana; W.P. No. 29956 of 2024; High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad; T. Vinod Kumar, J.; decided 16.07.2025; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; Article 226 Constitution of India; writ of Mandamus; G.O.Rt.No.843 Home (Courts.A1) Department dated 25.10.2024; relief of Additional Public Prosecutor, II Additional District Judge-cum-II Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge-cum-II Additional Family Court, Medchal; illegality, arbitrariness, natural justice; Section 151 CPC; I.A. No. 1 of 2024 (suspension of G.O.); I.A. No. 1 of 2025 (vacation of interim orders); withdrawal of writ petition; miscellaneous petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

None on merits; leave granted to withdraw the Writ Petition, which was dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. ¶37

C. Sham Rao Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁶¹

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH^{DAYOF JULY} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{T.VINOD KUMAR}

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 29956^{0F 2024}

¶7

Between:

¶8

C. Sham Rao, S/o Late alaiah, Aqed about 60^{years, Occ. Advocate,FUo} H.No.1^-1 3-74, Lothukun ta,^c.B Tirumalagiii, Secunderabad,^{TelanganaState.}

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana,^{Rep. by its SpecialChief Secretary,Secretariat,} Hvderabad.

¶12

2 ffre^-Siite of Telangana,^{Rep. by its PrincipalSecretary, Home Department,} Secretariat, Hyderabad.'

¶13

3 The Direct6r o1 Prosecutions,^{Telangana State, Hyderabad'} 4 The District Collector, Medchal^{Malkajgiri District, Telangana State'}

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of^{the constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavit fited therewith,the High court may be} pleased to issue a writ, order or direction^{preferablya writ in the nature of writ of} Mandamus declaring the G.o.Rt.No.843,^{Home (Courts.Al} )^{Department, dated} 25togt2o24 issued by^{the RespondentNo.1 relievingthe Petitionerfrom the post} of Additional Public^{Prosecutor,ll Additional District Judge-cUM-llAdditional} Metropolitan Sessions^{Judge-cUM- ll AdditionalFamilycourt, Medchal, without} any reason and any opportunity^{as illegal, arbitrary,and violationof principles of} natural^justice

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶17

Petition under section^'l 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pteased to direct the Respondents to allow the petitioner to continue into the service as Additional Public Prosecutor for the court of ll Additionai District Judge-cUM-ll Additional Metropolitan sessions Judge-cUM- ll Additional Family court, Medchal, by suspending the G.O.Rt.No.843, Home (Courts.Al ) Defartment, dated 2510912024 issued by the Respondent No.1 pending disposal of the above writ petition

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶19

Between:

¶20

The state of relangana, Rep. by its Special chief secretary, secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶21

2 J!9 S]ale.of ,Telangana, Rep by its principal Secretary. Home Department, 'ecretariat, Hyderabad.

¶22

The Director of Prosecutions, Telanqana State. Hvderabad.

¶23

The District Collector, Medchat Malk_-ajgiri Distri'ct, ielangana State.

¶24

...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS

¶25

AND

¶26

C. Sham Rao, S/o Late C.B alaiah, Aged about 60 years. Occ. Advocate, R/o H.No.1 -1 3-74, Lothukun ta, Tirumalagiri, Secunderabad Telangana State.

¶27

...RESPONDENTM/RIT PETITIONER

¶28

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pteased to vacate the interim orders dated 2s.10.2024 passed in the above in LA No. .l ot 2024 in w.P.No.29956 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition as devoid of the merits

¶29

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. L. HARISH Counsel for the Respondent No.1: cp FOR GENERAL ADMIN|STRATION Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Gp FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: Gp FOR REVENUE

¶30

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶31

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

¶32

WRIT PETITION No. 299 56 of2O24

¶33

ORDER:

¶34

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) seeks permission

¶35

of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.