Writ petition sought mandamus directing removal of gates and structures from a park. Petitioner did not appear despite listing under 'For Dismissal'; the court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
,n
[33Es l
IN THE H]GH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENW FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANAALISHETW
WRIT PETITION NO:33lo9 OF 2014
Between
Sri. Muppavaram Madhusudhan Rao,, S/o Bhujangam, Age 42 Yrs., Occ Business, General Secretary, Nallagandla Huda Residential Welfare Association, R/o Plot No. 303, lndira Residency, Nallagandla HUDA, Nallagandla, Serilingampally, RR District.
...pETt,oNER
AND
...REspoNDENrs Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to ibsue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the respondents, as arbitrary, illegal, bad in law, violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents No.4 to remove the gates, arches and other structures from the park
l.A. NO: I OF 2014(WPMP. NO;41767 OF n14l
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin
the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepteased to direct
the respondents No.1 to remove the security from the park and keep access to the
park open to the public
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BANDAKINDI PURNACHANDRA GOUD (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for Respondent No. 1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4: SRI G. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY SC FOR GHMC
Counsel for Respondent No. 5: ---
The Gourt made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LIIXMINARAYAITAALISHETTY
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking followingrelief:
"Declaring the inactionof the respondentsas
arbitrary, illegal, and prays to directthe
respondent No.4 to remove thegates,arches and other structures from the Park."
respondent Nos.2 to 4 Present.
no interest to pursue the matter.
No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if anypending,shall stand dismissed.
SD'-M. JAWAHARREDDY TANT
I IrRUEcoPYl I OFFICER
lo '1. One CC to Sri Bandakindi.Purnachandra Goud ucl i: iil cciiocpfor MunicipalAdministration& Urban High Courftor theStateof Telangana' [OUT] - ^ - 3. One CC toSriG Madhusudhan Reddy, SC for GHMC OPUCI 4. Two CDCoPies MBCu-
I
i I t\
HIGH COURT
DATED: O4lOgl2O25
T= I.,1
wP.33409 0F 2014
fr r ti t s 14
o
o
t.
P.,.TCaEO *
DIFTIIFFil 0 3 -:i ON WTHOUT COSTS
&-r,'
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Muppavaram Madhusudhan Rao
The Government of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration
The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
The Zonal Commissioner, GHMC, Circle II, Seri Lingampally
The Deputy Commissioner, GHMC, Circle II, Seri Lingampally
M/s Aditya Housing & Infrastructure Development Corporation (P) Ltd.
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
