A writ petition challenging the corporation's allotment of a house number and property tax assessment to a third party over the petitioner's land was dismissed as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel submitted the cause no longer survived for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3383 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEI\4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRIT PETITION NO: 25142 OF 2015
Betwee n
Golkonda Satyanarayana, S/o Saraiah, aged 56 years, Occ; business, R/o H.No- 5- 4-57 Kothuru, Hanamakonda, Warangal District.
.....PETITIONER
AND
...,.RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue wnt or direction preferably Writ of ftilandamus declaring the action of the respondent no.2 in allotting house number by way of assessment dated 8- 10-2014 in favour of respondent no.3 as H. No.55-3- 153/3/1 Bheemaram, Hanamakonda, Warangal District in respect of property of the petitioner admeasuring 713-33 sq. yards in Sy.no. 607/2 Bheemaram, Hanamakonda(M) Warangal District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of naturaljustice and consequently set aside the said assessment and further direct the respondent no.2 corporation to cancel the said house number which was allotted in favour of the respondent no.3 for the subject property.
l.A.No:1 OF 2015 (WPMP.No:32647 QF zQlO
Petition Under Sectron 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.2 to consider and dispose of the representation dt.23-6-2015 submitted by the petitioner for cancelation of H. No,55-3-153/3/1 Bheemaram, Hanamakonda, Warangal District in respect of property of petitioner admeasuring 7'1 3-33 sq. yards in Sy.no. 607/2 Bheemaram, Hanamakonda(M) Warangal District, pending the disposal of writ petition in the interest ofjustice.
Counsel for tlre Petitioner : SRI KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI PASHAM MOHIT
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI Y.ASHOK RAJ
The Court made the following ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No.25142 of 2Ol5
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioner u,ou1d submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous
'2. Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs-
3 Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sha1l starid closed.
SD/. K.BHAVANISWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPYi/ 6
SECTION OFFICER
To
SA
TKS
Pr't(,.
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410912025
{H ES TA
k
';
L)
? I JAil 2026
it
i
*
-t
r:1.,_: -r r':O
ORDER
WP.No.25142 of 2015
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
/6^. (o.4.I\C1 1oiIlrlr(
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Golkonda Satyanarayana
The State of Telangana, rep. by Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration
The Greater Municipal Corporation of Warangal, Rep. by its Commissioner
P. Indrasena Reddy
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
