Dismissed¶27

Banda Balanarasimha, v. The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority

Telangana HC3 Sept 2025WP/39920/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, Special Original Jurisdiction, 03-09-2025; WP No. 39920 of 2014; petitioner Banda Balanarasimha v. Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA) and Tahasildar, Qutubullapur Mandal; writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution alleging illegal, arbitrary erection of F.T.L. Pillar by HMDA in petitioner's land (Ac. 0-13 guntas, Sy. No. 145, Bahadurpally Village, Qutubullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District), violative of Articles 14 and 21; interim application IA No. I of 2014 (WPMP No. 50087 of 2014) under Section 151 CPC; dismissed for non-prosecution as counsel (Sri M. Subba Reddy) had no instructions; no costs; misc petitions closed; bench: Justice Laxmi Narayana Alishetty; no merits adjudicated.

What the court decided

Banda Balanarasimha, Vs The Hyderabad… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁸³¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 39920 OF 2014

¶7

Between:

¶8

Banda Balanarasimha, Sio Yellaiah, aged 50^years, Occ ; Agriculture,^H.No.1-62, Bahadurpally, Qutubullapur, Ranga Reddy District.

¶9

.....PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Represented^{by its} Commissioner, Tarnaka, Hyderabad.

¶12

Tahasildar, Qutubullapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶13

.....RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^{prayingthat in the} circumstances stated rn the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Courtmaybe} pteased to issue a writ, order or direction one in nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in erecting^{pillar i-e., F.T.L Pillar in petitioner's} land to an extent of Ac 0.1 3^guntas in Sy. No.^{I 45} of^{BahadurpallyVillageof} Qutubuilapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as^{being illegal, arbitrary and} violative of Art 14 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct ihe^1st respondent to remove the pillar.

¶15

LA.NO:I OF 2014⁽ WPMP.NO:500s7 OF²⁰¹⁴¹

¶16

Petition Under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^statedin the affidavit filed in support of the writ^petition, the^{High Court may be pleasedto} grant interim directions directing the 1st respondent to^'remove the^{pillar i.e.'} F.T.L Pillar erected in^petitioner's land in an^{extent of Ac 0.13 guntas in Sy. No}

¶17

'1 45 of Bahadurpally Village of QUtubullapur Mandal, Ra rga Reddy District pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI M.SUBBA REDDY

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI V.NARASIMHA^{GOIJ ), SC FORHMDA}

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : GP FOR REVENUE

¶21

The Court made the following ORDER

¶22

t t

¶23

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

¶24

WRIT PETITION No.3992O of 2OL4

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioner represented that he has no instructions from the petitioner.

¶27

In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs

¶28

Miscellaleous petitions pending, if any, shal1 stand closed.

¶29

SD/. L. VIJAYA A SISTANT R RAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1 L*g CC's to c p FOR REVENUE, High Court for the e of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT) ? 9n"^{CC to SRt rv.'Suaen} REDDY, Advocate [OpUCl 9 9n"^{CC to SRr V NARASTMHA-GO} 4. Two CD Cooies UD, SC FOR HMDA, Advocate tOpUCJ SA n r PVL TA--

¶30

HIGH COURT

¶31

DATED:0310912025

¶32

't:
.,,,,.,
0 ri t:i fiIt .ti.t
\ '1-
*
...'.
. - . -1.'t<br>

¶33

ORDER

¶34

WP.No.39920 of 2014

¶35

DISMISSING THE W.P