Allowed

Gaini Gangavva alias Gaini Gangamani v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Nov 2025WP/33406/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Special Original Jurisdiction writ petition challenging a refusal to register a sale deed without issued grounds. The Court directed the authority to receive the document and process it, reserving the right to refuse with reasons. Costs to the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

The third respondent directed to receive, register and release the sale deed dated 15.10.2025 vide Slot Booking No.2500723500.

Gaini Gangavva alias Gaini Gangamani Vs The State of… — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰²¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD AT HYDE

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶7

PETITION NO:33406

¶8

Between:

¶9

Gaini Gangawa alias Gaini Gangamani, Wo Peddig ari Lingam aged about 61 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. H. No. 1-35/5/1, Thimmapu, Mosra, Nizamabad District, Telangana - 503206

¶10

Pilla Krishna Maraj, S/o Pitla Bhum Rao aged about^{41 years, Occ.Priest,} Rl"/o. H. No.3-40, Mallaram, Nizamabad Rural, Nizamabad District, Telangana - 503202

¶11

...PETIT!ONERS

¶12

¶13

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, Telangana.

¶14

The District Collector, District Collectorate Nizamabad, Nizamabad.

¶15

The Tahsildar-cum-Joint Sub Registrar, Mandal Revenue^{Office-Yedapally} Yedapally Mandal, Nizamabad District.

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of^{lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filedtherewith,} the^{High Courtmay be} pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent^No. 3^{in refusingto registerthe} Sale Deed vide Slot Booking No.2500723500,^{Dt.15.10.2025 without issuing any} grounds for refusal of the same as illegal, arbitrary against the Section 71 of Registration Act and^provisions of Stamp Act and^{unconstitutional,beingin} violation of Articles 14,21 and 300 of the Constitution^{of lndia and consequently} direct the 3rd Respondent to receive,^{registerand release the Sale Deed} Document Dl. 15.1O.2025 sought to^{be presentedby the Petitionersin favourof}

¶18

Petitioner No.2 in respect Agricuttural Land admeasuring Ac. 0.20 Gts, in Sy. No.507/7/1, all situated at Yedapaily Mandal, Nizambad District

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 208

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant.interim order directing the 3rd Respondent to receive, register and release the Sale Deeds vide Slot Booking No. 2500723500, Dt.1S. 10.2O2S pertaining to Agricultural Land admeasuring Ac. o.2o Gts, in sy. No.so7t7l1, situated at Ambam Village, Yedapally Mandal, Nizambad District pending disposal of the above writ petition

¶21

counsel for the Petitioners : sRl ALr FARAZ FARooeul

¶22

counsel for the Respondents: sMT. s. SRAVANTHI, AGp FoR srAMps & REGISTRATION

¶23

The Court made the foltowing: ORDER

¶24

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶25

UTRIT PEIITION N0-33406 of 2o25

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and Smt. S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government^Pleaderfor Stamps and Registration appearing for the respondents and perused the material on record. With their consent, this writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

¶28

Aggrieved by the action of the respondent No.3ⁱⁿ refusing to register the Sale Deed vide Slot Booking No.25007235OO, dated 15.1O.2O25 without issuing any ground for refusal of the s€une, the petitioners liled the present writ petition and requested to direct the respondent No.3 to receive, register and release the Sale Deed document dated 15.1O.2O25 sought to be presented by the petitioners in favour of the petitioner No.2 in respect of agricultural land admeasuring Ac.O.20 guntas,ⁱⁿ Sy.No.SO7 /7 /1, situated at Yedapally Mandal, Nizambad District.

S.Ir, J W.P.No.334O6 of 2O2S

¶33

g. Learned Assistant Government pleader for Stamps and Registration^submits that the respondents will receive the docurment^presented by the petitioners vide slot Booking No.25oo7235oo, dated 1s.10.2025 and process the same or follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 71,, of the Registration Act, 1908 (for short, the Act, 1908) for rejecting the same.

¶34

The sectionT l of the Act, 1908, reads as follows:

¶35

Reasons for refusal to register to be recorded._

¶36

(l) Every Sub-Registrar refusing to register a document, except on the ground that the property to which it relates is not situated within his sub_ district shall make an order of refusal and recorded his reasons for such order in his Book No.2, and endorse the words "registration refused,, on the document; and, on application'made by any person exe:cuting or claiming under the document, shall, without payment and unnecessary delay, give him a copy of the reasons so recorded.

¶37

(2) No registering officer shall accept for registration a document so endorsed unless and until, under the provisions hereinafter contained, the document is dirr:cted to be registered.

¶38

\ \

¶39

In view of the above mad.e submissions coupled with the provisi.n under section 71 of the Act, 19og, this writ

¶40

¶41

s& .r W.P.No.334O6 of 2O25

¶42

petition is disposed of directing the Registering Authority to receive, register and release the subject document presented by the petitioners vide Slot Booking No.25007235oo, dated 15.10.2025 rn respect of the subiect property, subject to the petitioners complying with the provisions of the Act, 1908 as well as the Indian Stamp Act, 1899. It will be open to the Registering Authority to refuse the document presented before him, if he has any objection, by duly assigning reasons in support of such decision and communicate the said decision to the petitioners. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case as to the entitlement of the petitioners to get the subject document registered. There shatl be no order as to costs.

¶43

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ

¶44

petition shall stand closed.

¶45

SD/. A.H.S. GOWRI^SHANKAR ASSISTANT

¶46

//TRUE COPY//

¶47

SECTION OFFICER

¶48

To, 1. The^{principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, The State of} Telangana, HYderabad.

¶49

The District Collector,^{District Collectorate Nizamabad' Nizamabad'}

¶50

The Tahsildar-cum-Joint^{Sub Registrar, Mandal Revenue Office-Yedapally Yedapally} Mandal, Nizamabad^District. t,,

4- one cc to sRr. ALr FARAZ FARooeurAdvocate topucl 5' Two CCs to GP FoR STAMPS & REGOSTRATION, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUf] 6. Two CD Copies PVL GJP

, I

t I

HIGH COURT

DATED i0411112025

\ \

ORDER

WP.No.33406 of 2025

1 HE St'4 I4-
d lsrruuM
-0'
-t a
n
. ..:

¶65

¶66

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

¶67

WITHOUT COSTS

¶68

.f t L: ,,..,5.;*.,r...-

¶69

.i6.r.arfi---

¶70

18 \

Gaini Gangavva alias Gaini Gangamani v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gaini Gangavva alias Gaini Gangamani v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Repani Hanmanthu Vs The State of Telangana, And 4 Others

Repala Chandraiah Vs The State of Telangana, And 4 Others

Mr. Sandineni Ramakrishna Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Dr. M. Krishna Vs The State of Telangana

Neeradi Naresh Vs State of Telangana

V. Gopala Krishna Vs The State of Telangana