Writ petition seeking release of a detained vehicle and compensation was dismissed for non-prosecution after repeated absence of representation for the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33021
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
SENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 5557 OF 2021
Between:
Repani Hanmanthu, S/o Repani Ramulu, Age. 30 years, Occ. Stonemason, Rl/o. H.N-o.2-857, Sriram Nagar Colony, Jawahar Na!a(V) Kapra(M), Medchat District, State of Telangana.
...PET!TIONER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more especially one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus-
iii. Declaring the action of the Government of Telangana specifically the Respondent No.4 in detaining the petitioner's vehicle bearing registration No.Ap 07 BC 4288 as illegal and sans any sanction of taw.
iv. To direct the Government of Telangana to pay reasonable compensation for the illegal and unlawful detention of the petitioner's vehicle by its public servants.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writpetition, the High Courtmay bepleased to direct the respondents to releasepetitioner vehicle from the illegal detention of Revenue lnsglector of Jawaharnagar village and state the reasons for such illegal detention of ['etitioner vehicle forthwith and without any further delayin time.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI UMESH CHANDRA.P.V.G(Nor PRESENT)
Counset for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.S: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.5557 of 2O2L
IOIDT5TTE
This petition is coming for hearing since 2O2L. On 13.LO.2O25 when the matter was callqd, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for Dismissal'. Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute this case.
2' Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution/default. No order as to costs.
3'pending misce,aneous apprications, if any, in this Writpetition shall also stand closed.
sD/- L.VIJAYA
//TRUE COPYII \
To,
OFFICER
BSR
TKS qr\l\
.TIru
,/ /
/
HIGH COURT
DATED:03/1 112025
T= l.{
WP.No.5557of 2021
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION FORNON.PROSECUTIONIDEFAULT' WIHOUTCOSTS
ro\3>6
-::r,j*..r.;.*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging detention of the petitioner's vehicle should be prosecuted when neither petitioner nor counsel appeared.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Repani Hanmanthu
The State of Telangana, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department
The District Collector, Medchal District
The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kapra Mandal
The Revenue Inspector, Jawaharnagar Village
The Station House Officer, Jawaharnagar Police Station
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
