Writ petition challenging a revenue order was withdrawn by the petitioners on counsel's letter seeking liberty to pursue other remedies; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition without costs.
Permission to withdraw granted with liberty to avail remedies under law; no costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3296 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTHDAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENryFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEC.V. BHASKARREDDY
WRIT P ETITION NO: 3320 OF2025
...'ET'T'ONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 ollhe constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated inthe affidavitfiled therewith,the High court maybe pleased to issue an appropriate Writ,Order or d irectionmore particularlyone in the nature ofwrit of Mandamus declaringthe actionof the RespondentNo.2in issuing the impugned orderdtd.3l112025as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional' contrary to settledprinciplesof law and consequentlyset asidethe same in the interest of Justice anddirect the Respondent no.s to rejoin the Petitioners family
forthwith and Peri ic 'ers no 1 and 2 may be directed to take eroc,d care of aI her needs
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition unde liection'151 cpc praying that in the circiu rnsitances stated in the affidavit filed r r Lrpport of the petition, the High cirurt may, lre rreased to grant srAY of all fu.l r-' proceedings on impugned order dtd- 3.1-:,1025 on fire of Respondents l)encir r disposal of this writ petition, in the rnterer;t r:f Justice.
Counsel for the Pet :ioners: SRI M.RAJU Counsel for the Rr:s rondents No. 1 to 3: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Res rondents No. 4: Gp FOR Hbi/ii Counsel for the Res rondents No. 5: - The Court made ttre following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
wRIT PETITION No. 3320 of 2o25
ORDER:
Pursuant to a letter, dated 7O.O4 .2025, given by the . Iearned counsel for [he petitioners to the Registrar(Judicial) seeking permission to withdraw the WritPetitionwith a liberty to avail the remedies as available underlaw, this Writ Petition is posted under the caption "for withdrawal".
Permission as sought for is accorded
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn granting the liberty as prayed for. However, it is made clearthat on the same set of cause of action, thepetitioners are not entitled to hle any writ petition in future beforethis Court.No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneouspetitions pending, if any,
shall stand closed.
SD/.M. OSMAN ALI BAIG SS TANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BGS LS
aip
HIGH COURiI
DATED: 16l0tll2021
ORDER
WP.No.3320 cf 2025
-.)-=.a:= =
7'i. Irrt' s 14 I4:
a
(('
1 21 '^,, ?!;15 :
..s
, ,,,
I -1//
\ :t ../.
-"
-- ---.a:-/'
DISMISSING T HE WRIT PETITION AS WITHT)RAWN WITHOUT CCXIiTS
o$[,rvr
N. Ganga Praveen Naik
The State of Telangana
Appellate Tribunal-cum-District Collector and Magistrate, Hyderabad District
Revenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad Division
Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
