Disposed

Sakinam Bhushamma v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC15 Apr 2025WP/11251/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition over erroneous e-pattadar passbook entries showing only Ac.0.42 cents instead of Ac.0.82 guntas in the petitioner's name. The court disposed of it directing the RDO to decide the pending representations/appeals in accordance with law after hearing both parties, within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.3 (RDO) directed to dispose of representations/appeals dated 07.11.2020 and 07.11.2022 per law after hearing parties, preferably within eight weeks; no costs.

Sakinam Bhushamma Vs The State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

I i

¶2

[^32e6 ]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL

¶5

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶8

WRIT PETITIO N NO:'l 1251 0F 202s

¶9

Between:

¶10

Sakinam Bhushamma, W/g.t_ ,tp Bhadraiah, Aged about 65 years, R/o. Seethanagaram Revenue Virage, Dummugd;; rr,tinorr,^-ehair;;i riJiirJbuoem District.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of Telangana, Rqp. Oy its principal Secretary, Revenue Departmenr, Dr.B. R.Am'bediiriieiingini'S;;retari;t,'Hya;;b;;.

¶14

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dummugudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶15

3' The District corrector Bhadradri Kothagudem District at Kothagudem

¶16

The Mandal Revenue officer, Dummugudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District

¶17

5 !aldra Sathyavathi,.Age_.Not known, Rt/o.parnasala Cross road, uummugudem Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of. Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not disposing the representations/appears dr.o7.11.2020, or.11.2022 and wrongry dereting an extent of 0.40 cents as against the total extent of 0.g2 cents in sy.no.7/7 against katha no.l47 in new pattadar passbook bearing no. T211'10030067 situated at seethanagaram Revenue vilage, Dummugudem Mandar of Bhadradri Kothagudem District and not rectifying the said mistake committed is illegar, arbitary and violates the provisions of old and new pattadar passbooks act and in violation of Article 21 and 3oo(A) of the constitution of lndia and consequenfly

¶20

./'

¶21

direct the^{RDO toforthwithconsider andpass orders on . the} appeal/representations^{filed by the petitioner}

¶22

IA NO: 10F²⁰²⁵

¶23

Petition under^{section151 CPC praying thatin th.e circumstances stated in} the affidavit^{filed in support of the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} issue an interim^{direction directingthe 3rd respondent RDO,Dummugudemfor} disposing the^{appealfiled dt.07.11.2022 &.07.11.2020 for showingtotal extentof} 0.82,centsinSy.No.7/TagainstKathano.l4Tinpattadarpassbookbearing no.T271^{10030067situated al Seethanagaram Revenuevillage, Dummugudem} Mandal of^{Bhadradri KothagudemDistrict pending disposal of the above writ} Petition.

¶24

Counsel for^{the Petitioner : SRI P.V.RAMANA}

¶25

Counsel for the^{Respondents No.1to3 : ASST. GP FOR REVENUE}

¶26

Counsel for the^{ResPondentsNo.4:}

¶27

The Court^{made the following: ORDER}

¶28

¶29

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.1125L of 2025

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

This writ petition is filed declaring the action of respondent No.3 in^{not disposing} of the representations/ appeals, dated^07.11.2O2O and 07.11.2022 hled by the petitioner for making entries in respect of the remaining land to an extent of^Ac.O.4O cents in Sy.No.7/7 of Seethanagaram Village, Dummugudem Mandal, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of .ra'iri'.al justice and consequently, prayed for other appropriate reliefi.

¶32

It is stated that the petitioner is the owner and possessor of the land to an extent of Ac.O.82 guntas in Sy.No.7/7 of Seethanagaram Village, Dummugudem Mandal, BhadradriKothagudem District, having acquired the same from her ancestors and her name was incorporated as pattadar in all the revenue records and pattadar passbook was also issued in her favour under the provisions of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 2O2O (for short "the Act 9 of 2O2O"l. It is further stated that while issuing e-pattadar passbook bearing No.T27110030067, the land to an extent of Ac.O.42 irr-cents was entered in her name and the remaining

¶33

¶34

¶35

CVBR, J wp ll25t _2025

¶36

extent of Ac.0.40 cents was entered in the name of pandru Satyavathi-respondent No.5 and as such, she made representations/ appeals, dated 07.1 l.2O2O and 07.1 1.2022 seeking for data correction. The grievance of the petitioner is that even after receipt of the said representations/ appeals, the respondent authorities did not consider the same.

¶37

Considered the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.l to 4 and with their consent, this writ petition is being disposed of at the admission stage. In view of the nature of relief sought for in this writ petition, issuance of notice to the unoflicial respondent is dispensed with.

¶38

. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for,,.rthe respective parties and as it is stated that the ropr.esentatioirs/ appeals, dated 07. ll.2O2O and 07. 1 1.2022 submitted by the petitioners are pending before respondent No.3 for the last two and half years, this Court, without expresslng any oplnlon on the merits of the matter or inter se disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondent herein, deems it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition

i i l

CVB& J Wp ll25l_2o25

directing respondent No.3 to dispose of the representations/ appeals, dated 07.11.2O2O and 07.11.20?2 submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law after hearing the petitioner and the unofhcial respondent herein, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of eight (O8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶45

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall

¶46

be no order as to costs.

¶47

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,

¶48

shall stand c'losed.

¶49

SD/- A. SRINIVASA REDDY ASS T T REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPYII

To,

SECTION OFFICER

The Principal Secretary, Revenue. Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Terangana

¶54

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Dummugudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶55

The District Collector Bhadradri Kothagudem District at Kothagudem

¶56

The Mandal Revenue officer, Dummugudem, Bhadradri Kothagudem District

¶57

One CC to SRI P.V.RAMANA, Advocate. tOpUCl

¶58

Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana. tourl

¶59

Two CD Copies.

BSK

HIGH COURT

DATE D : 1 510412025

ORDER

( ,J+ rr{f sir{ Ie
2s Afn 7t]i5 i
r:n1n 11--r r(-O

¶68

WP.No.11251 ot 2025

¶69

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ef{8W

Sakinam Bhushamma v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sakinam Bhushamma v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bmr Enclave Residents Welfare Assn Vs The State of Telangana

Perli Yebu Vs The State of Telangana

Gangireddy Shankar Reddy Vs Dr. Harish

Sada Narasamma Vs State of Telangana

Shankar Kompari Vs State of Telangana

Ch.Bhupal Goud Vs State of Telangana