Dismissed

Sahebzada Azmath Ali Khan v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC23 Oct 2025WP/31635/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition by a cricket club and its office-bearer challenging refusal to register three players was withdrawn with liberty to file afresh; the court permitted withdrawal, dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs, and closed pending miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw with liberty to file afresh; dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Sahebzada Azmath Ali Khan Vs The State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

132171

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD^{DAY OF OCTOBER} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY FIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^N.TUKARAMJI

¶6

WRIT PE TITION NO: 31635^{OF 2025}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sahebzada Azmath Ali Khan.^{S/o.Sahebzada RasheeduddinAli Khan, Age} ioort oo years, occ.Vice^{president(ln_charge presidentDeccan Arsenal} Crrcket Club)

¶9

2 O"""i,^-Ar.'"nal Cricket^{Club ( Regd No 540 of 2014} ),^Affihatedlo rfrJeiaoaO Cricket Association,^{Re-p. by its Vice President(ln-charge} pi".io"nt b"icin Arsenat cricket club) Sahebzada Azmath AIi^Khan,Both Olo at 22-7^-38211 . Purant^{Haveli, Hyderabad}

¶10

...PETITIONERS

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana,^{Rep. by its Principal Secretary- Youth Servicesand} Sports, Tank Bund,^HYderabad.

¶13

2 ifi" np"iCoJnCit or^{Hyderabad Cricket Association,Rep by Secretary Office} at Raiiv Gandhi lnternaironal Cricket^{StadiumUppalHyderabad'}

¶14

3 i|. tf,i"i ei"cutrvc^{Off icer. Hyderabad Cricket AssociationOff ice at Rajiv} Gandhi lnternational Cricket^{Stadium, Uppal, Hyderabad}

¶15

4 ine Hvoerabad Cricket^{Association,Rep by its Secretary Officeat Raliv} Gandhi lnternatronal Cricket Stadium^{Uppal, Hyderabad'}

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article^{225 of the constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances statedⁱⁿ the^{affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be} pleasedtoissuewrit,orderordirection,moreparticularlyinthenatureofWRlT oF il/ANDAX/US BY^{CON/MAND to declarethe inactionof respondentsNo. 2 to} 4 in not^permitting the^{petitionerto reg ister/participateGtt/ohithRaj} (HCAG0O246), D. JoelJohnson^{(HCAD00222)and K Maruthi (HCAK00696)by} replacing them with^{[r,4ohd. Faisal Alvi (HCAM0O932),SudeepDhali} (HCAS00865)8sUmerPrawez(HCAU0o046)aScapricious,unlawful'arbitrary' illegal, violative of^{the rights of the Petitionerclub/ General Body Member under} bye-laws, Article^{14 and 21 of constitutionof lndia andconsequentlydirectthe} Respondents^{No. 2 to 4 to register/ participateG lVohith Raj (HCAG00246)'D}

¶18

Joel Johnson (HCAD00222) and K. lvlaruthi (HCAK00696) lr replacinq them with It/ohd. Faisal Alvi (HCAM00932), Sudeep Dhati (HCAS0083 i) and Unrer Prawez (HCAU00046) to represent the petitioner club lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thi: ircLrmstances stated in the affrdavrt filed in support of the petrtion, the Hrgh C I _, i nray be pleased to direct respondents No. 2 to 4 to reg ister/pa rticipate G lVc I i I Raj (HC.AG00246), D Joel Johnson (HCAD00222) and K N,4aruthr (HCAK000: l) by replacing thenr with lrrlohd. Faisal Alvi (HCAIV00932), Sudeep Dhali (i-lit rS0CB65) and Umer Prawez (HCAU00046) to represent the petitioner club

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. MIR OMER KHAN

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR SPORTS

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2to4: SRI A.P. SURESF, SC FOR HCA

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶24

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶25

WRIT PETITION No.31635 OF 2025

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

When the matter is taken up for hearing, iearned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of thts Court to withdraw this Petition \'ith liberty to file alresh

¶28

Permission as sought for is accorded.

¶29

Accordinglr., the \r/rit Pclition is dismissed as withdraurn with the libcrt1, pral'ed for. There shali be no ord er as to costs

¶30

Mrscellaneor-rs petitions pending, tl any, shall stand closed.

¶31

SD/. K.BHAVANI SWAMY AS ISTANT REGISTRA

//TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER

To,

'1. One CC to SRl. lVlR OI,4ER KHAN, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR SPORTS ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 3. One CC to SRl. A.P. SURESH, SC FOR HCA [OPUC] 4. Two CD Copies

BIM

TKS

HIGH COURT

DATED:2311012025

ORDER

WP.No.31635 of 2025

I rf f*
( Q'r I A
'1 (<br>,J
rrl
lr,Q i t^,F, 70?fr
\ l-, v*
t.
l c}{l

¶43

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION^{AS A/ITHDRAWN} WITHOUT COSTS

¶44

rv
..,1
.)"

Sahebzada Azmath Ali Khan v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahebzada Azmath Ali Khan v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Srinivas Putta Vs Union of India - Ministry of External Affairs

Mr. Laxmikant Vijayvargiya Vs Chief Commissioner For Person With Disabilities

Seelam Umamaheswara Reddy, Vs State of Telangana

M/s. Vasuki Information Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India

M/s. Nandaka Information Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India

G. Sravan Kumar Vs Telangana State Road Transport Corporation (Tsrtc)