Dismissed¶51

Mr. Laxmikant Vijayvargiya v. Chief Commissioner For Person With Disabilities

Telangana HC16 Oct 2025WP/27742/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition permitted with liberty to refile; W.P. 27742 of 2025 (Telangana HC, Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka, 16-10-2025) dismissed as withdrawn without costs. Underlying prayer: mandamus against Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities for non-disposal of Complaint CCPD Case No. 14364/109212023 dated 27.07.2023 despite completed pleadings; Article 226 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016; I.A. Nos. 1 and 2 of 2025; no precedent engaged; merits left undetermined owing to withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition W.P. No. 27742 of 2025 dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition/application; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed. ¶51

Mr. Laxmikant Vijayvargiya Vs Chief Commissioner… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶51

Issue for consideration

Whether permission should be granted, via I.A. No. 2 of 2025 (Section 151 CPC), for the petitioner to withdraw W.P. No. 27742 of 2025 with liberty to file a fresh writ petition. +1 more

¶24

Court's answer

Permission is accorded to the petitioner's submission seeking leave, via I.A. No. 2 of 2025, to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh application.

¶32

Ratio / Principle

I.A. No. 2 of 2025 is allowed; consequently the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, with no order as to costs.

¶33

Key takeaways

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition were directed to stand closed (sentence continues in next paragraph of the source).obiter¶34

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (Special Original Jurisdiction), order dated 16-10-2025 by Hon'ble Sri Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka in I.A. No. 2 of 2025 in/and W.P. No. 27742 of 2025 (Laxmikant Vijayvargiya v. Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities and others). The writ petition had sought, under Article 226, a writ of mandamus declaring illegal and arbitrary the inaction of Respondent No. 1 in not disposing of Complaint CCPD Case No. 14364/109212023 dated 27.07.2023 despite completion of pleadings, allegedly violative of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and directing disposal within four weeks. On the hearing date, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted I.A. No. 2 of 2025 (under Section 151 CPC) seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The court accorded permission, allowed I.A. No. 2, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, made no order as to costs, and directed pending miscellaneous petitions to stand closed. The merits of the claimed CCPD inaction were not adjudicated. Counsel: Mohammed Omer Farooq for petitioner; A. Kranti Kumar Reddy, SC for Central Government, for respondents.

¶1

[³³⁰⁰ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶7

l.A.No.2 OF 2025

¶8

IN/AND

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO: 277 420F 2025

¶10

Between:

¶11

Mr. Laxmikant Vijayvargiya, S/o Shri Rajendra Prasad, Age. 60 Years Occ. Retired BHEL Employee, Ri/o A-1^'101, Aakriti Miro, Gopanpally Road, Nallagandla, Serilingampally, Rangareddy District, Telangana State, PlN. 500046

¶12

...PETTTTONER(S)

¶13

AND

¶14

Chief Commissioner For Person With Disabilities, Sth Floor, NISD Building, Plot No.G-2, Sector-10, New Delhi 110075

¶15

The Secretary, Ministry of Heavy lndustries, Govemment of lndia, 83, Tower 1 , New Moti Bag, New Delhi -^{1 '10021} Email. [email protected]

¶16

Society of lndian Automobile Manufacturers^(SIAM), Core 4-8, sth^{Floor, lndia} Habitat Centre Lodhi Road, New Delhi - 110003

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia^praying thatⁱⁿ the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or an order or a direction, more^particularly a writ in the nature of Mand-amus declaring the inaction of Respondent^{No. I in not disposing} of the Complaint bearing CCPD Case No. 14364/109212023,^{dated27.O7.2023,} despite completion of^pleadings, as illegal, arbitrary and^{violative of the Rights of} Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, and consequently. direct^{Respondent No. 1 to} forthwith take steps to dispose of the Complaint bearing CCPD^CaseNo. 143641109212023. dated 27.07.2023, by^passing a reasoned^{order,within a}

¶19

¶20

period of four weeks or such time as this Honourable Court deems fit and appropriate

¶21

lA NO: 1 OF 202s

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondents No. 1 to forthwith take steps to dispose of the complaint bearing ccPD case No. 14364r1og2t2o23,dated 27.07.2023.

¶23

lA NO: 2 OF 2025

¶24

Petition undersection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pteased to pleased to permit the Petitioners herein to withdraw the present writ petition w.p. No' 27742 of 2025, with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, and pass any other order or orders.

¶25

counsel for the^petitioner : sRl MOHAMMED OMER FARooe

¶26

counsel for the Respondents: sRl A.KRANTI KUMAR REDDY, . SC FOR CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

¶27

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶28

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶29

I.A.No.2 of 2O2S In/and WRIT No. 42 of c

¶30

ORDER:

¶31

when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.Mohammed omer Farooq, learned counsel for petitioner submits that I.A.No.2 of 2o2s is filed seeking to permit the petitioners herein to withdrarv the writ petition with liberty to file afresh application.

¶32

Permission is accorded

¶33

Accordi,gly, the t.A.No.2 of 2o2s is allow,ed. consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayecl for. There sharl be no order as to costs.

¶34

Mi'scellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ

¶35

Petition shalt stand closed.

¶36

¶37

asbrsfeD(fh'+YSiS^=F 6.

¶38

//TRUE COPYII

¶39

To,

¶40