Writ petition challenging rejection of a building application and municipal notices. Counsel for petitioner submitted the cause did not survive adjudication; recording this, the High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without costs and closed miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3383 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
15
Between:
A. Aruna, Wo. A.Raju, aged about 40 years, occ Housewife, R/o. H.No.171 1 -7 21 1, Kummariwada Ursu, Kareemabad, Warangal, Warangal District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the rejection Memo issued in Roc.No.G1/7816/2015, dated 10.09.2015 rejecting the Building Application No. 412l15-16 dated 27.02.2015, issued by the 3rd respondent and also to declare the- notice No.UC/09/TPSM.No.28lCircle Vl/WMC/20'15 dated 03.07.2O15, 14.O9.2015 issued by the 4th respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, consequently direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to complete the minor internal works in the building constructed at plot No. 13, admeasuring 550 sq.yards, survey No. 150A, near H.No.23-6-144/B, situated at ROB, Hunter Road, Hanamkonda, (Shayampet Jagir).
I o 1
petition under Section 15'' cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to ;::j.";:"#il:, of the notices No.0e/rpsA// No 28lcircre vuwMc 2;1s the rejection Memo issued in Roc.No.G1l78 16tzo1s, da4'09'2015' 41?t15-16 dated 27.o2.2.ted 10'09'2015 rejecting the Building Application No. 3 rd re s p o n d e n,,".p,i * rll *, ffi :::j; ff : TJ,I.i,ffi : :;;; " ;
2oF 1 P. NO sl o 5
petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated ;.:::;::::XJf:j;.,:?,"or the petition, the Hish courr may be preased to H No 23-6- 1 44,8, n p ot ;:o f,T,'jj:";:;1ffi T"#: ; :::: ;li;::k: yards, situated at ROB, Hunter Road, Hanaml a' (Shayampet Jagir), warangal , pending disposar of the above writ petitionl
3 F 1 =l o 1
petition under Secl in the arridavit rireo in suppoJrt'",,,fi"|,Iil::^ff ffi;J [T::J:: direct the 2nd respondent corporation not to de petitioner tiil the 1st respondent takes a decision on 'o"tnthe building of the the petitioner ror chanse or rand use pendins ,^" .,.rf"i::f:l1l :::il:* r,
Counset for the petitioner: SRI A.pRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR MCPL ADMN_URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 4: SRt pASHAIU MOHIT, SC FOR MCPL The Court made the following: ORDER
\
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMINARAYANAALISHETTY
WP of 2015
ORDERz
This Writ Petition is filed seekingthe following substantive
relief:
"... to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamusdeclaringthe re.jection Memo issued inRoc.No.Gl/7816/2015dated 10.09.2015 rejecting the BuildingApplication No- 4t2/15-t6 dated 27.02.2015 issued bythe 3rd respondent and also to declare thenotice No.UC/l9/TPS/W.No28/CircleVI/WMC/2015 dated 03.07.2015 and 14.09.2015issued by the 4th respondent as illegal and arbitrory consequently, todirectthe respondents to allow the petitioner tocompletethe minor internal worlts in the buildingconstructed at Plot No.l3, admeasuring 550 squareyards, Survey No.l50- A, near H.No.23-6-144/8, situated atROB, Hunter Road, Hanamkonda,( Shayampet Jagir)."
dismissed as infructuous.
2
LNA, J WP.No.J0929 of 20ts
No costs.
D/. M. NAGAMA A NT REG
//TRUE COPY//
CTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1010912025
ORDER
WP.No.30929 of 2015
I
tlF SII
'v
I z
I3 DgJA.lzozt P
t ]r
.si:]l:ii':1 ,t1
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
MMT l+ l2 zs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the rejection of the building application and the notices issued by the Warangal Municipal Corporation should be quashed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Aruna
The State of Telangana
The Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal, Represented by its Commissioner
The City Planner, Warangal Municipal Corporation
The Deputy Commissioner, Circle-II Kazipet, Warangal Municipal Corporation
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
