Writ petition challenging proposed demolition of structures following cancellation of a property tax assessment order was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear despite the matter being listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3383 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
iur noNounnBlE sRr JUSTTcE LAxMr NARAyANA ALTsHETw
WRIT PETITION NO: 11560 OF 201 5
Between:
N. Ramulu Goud, S/O late N. Pandu, Aged 58 years, Occ Business R/o.'1-36/A, Gajularamaram Village Quthbullapur R. R. District-
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents, contemptating to demolish the structures pursuant to the cancellation of the assessment order in l' 11 ' . respect of Door No. 1-36/4 in Gajularamaram Village with Assessment No. 1152404324 vide proceedings No.42lA1lRev/Circle -15|GHMCI2O15/45 dated 10.12.2014 without any notice and following due process of law as highly illegal, arbitrary, capricious and violative of fundamental rights and consequently direct the respondents not to demolish the structures of the petitioner ' in respect i'i of 400 sq. yards of site covered by D.No.1-36/4 at Gajularamaram, Quthbullapur Circle, : GHMC, RR district.
l.A. NO:1 OF201S(WPMP. NO:15274OF 2015)
/
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the ci r umstancesstatedin the affidavitfiled in support of the petition, the High Court maybe pleased to direct theRespondents not to demolish the structure of the Ietitionercoveredby Door No. 1-36/,4at V Gajularamaram, Quthbultapur Municip;t circle and injury.
Counsel forthe Petitioner: SRI SUBRAHMANYAM KUREL-</sup>
Counselfor Respondents No.1&2 : SRI K.RAVIMAHENDEI1SC FORGHMC
Counsel forthe Respondent No.3 : SRI V.NARASIMHA GOL D(SC FORHMDA) -- Counsel forthe Respondent No.4 :
The Court madethe following:ORDER
a
I r{ 'F ., .rt.t {ilr *at
,F 'n.| ft '*s.
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE LAXMI NARAYANAALISHETTY
WRIT PETITION No.l1560 of 2()15
ORDER:
Sri K.Ravi Ma.Lrerrder, learned Standing Counsel for respondents I and 2 (GHMC) and Sri V.Narasimha Goud, learned Standing Ccunscl [.rr 3td ;espondent (Hh{DA) are present.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall starrd
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BSK PA4(,
\
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 010912025
a t .IHE SI4
\J
C.
O 7 JAN ?O2E z
)
t l it., PrlTCi ,(
t
{ :'
,
i t
?
+
I
:
'
!,!
i.L,-
r_.P-{r
't1 *l
'' 9t'-'
rl-
il
iS( tI
&
: t_rl',
,1.r{
,'n
I
t. r,
LH[- +
ORDER
WP.No.11560 of 2015
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION ' WITHOUT COSTS
rdt**{
2 provisions across 2 enactments
N. Ramulu Goud
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Deputy Commissioner, Quthubullapur Circle 15 GHMC
Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority
Shri N. Ajay Babu
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
