Dismissed

Naguloori Narsimha Welfare Association v. The State of Telangana Rep.by its Principal Secretary

Telangana HC9 Sept 2025WP/17247/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging GHMC's removal of a statue installed in Chilkalguda Park under a 2015 permission was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear despite the matter being listed for dismissal.

What did the court decide?

None granted; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.

Naguloori Narsimha Welfare Association Vs The… — Municipal and Town Planning | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

I $( $ s#lft l

¶2

[³³⁸³ ]

¶3

fiI t. r , i. I rt ( t I i

¶4

¶5

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶6

¶7

TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTTCE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

¶12

¶13

Between:

¶14

In*H:ll,'[3fi fi^{i].ri!i.Ji[+i]13'lX3^[?s,*i:,:os33ui'03??'osXBBP,ToXl} Business, 1 l.No. 114-322t18/6, chilkatguda, seCunoeraoad.

AND

...PET|T|ONER

The State.__"1 TgtS.ngaTg Rep.by its principal Secretary,, Municipal Administration And Urban Develoirm6nt, Secretari5ibuirdangi,-l-irderabad.'

¶20

The Greatel Hy.dgabad. Municipal Corporation Rep.by its, Commissioner, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad.

¶21

Ih" Deputy commissioner, G.H.M.C. circle. No. 1g,, west Maredpally, .r Secunderabad.

¶22

L^s.glv.ll?r€rlaflo,;-ageg. about 78_ years, occ Retired Employee R/o 114322120 126, Ma rkandeya Nagar, ch ilki lg udi, secu nderabad. tioo'oo t .

¶23

srinivas Gog9,. ?geqry years,_occ Emptoyee R/o 1 1-3-377t4tN19l1, Kamala Devi Apts., Flat Nb. 203,-Near Skandagiri femple Secunder"UaO. S00 061.

¶24

BX.Singh, aqe!]^s yg.ars, Retired Employee R/o 1 14-322t18/3, chitkatguda, SecundeaOad. SOO O6t.

¶25

Padma Rao:_"9gd^65years, Retired Employee R/o 6-1-176, chilkalguda, SecunderaOaO. 5OO OOi.

¶26

E. K.venkatesh, aged 4.0 . ye:qrq, R/o 114-394t2ts6, srinivasa Nagar, Chilkalguda, Secunderabad 5OO OOt .

¶27

K.Anjaiah, aged s5 ygarpr-R/o R/o 11-4-3z2t2on, Matkandeya Nagar, Chilkalguda, Secunderibad 500 061.

¶28

10.ff9af ffog.a..,IEst9r),,-ag9d 56 yqars, occ private Emptoyee R/o Ftat No.

¶29

,i ? 201, seven Hill sadan Apartments, Namalgundu secunddratiad. 500 061

...RESPONDENTS

,#,l

.v^{Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in.'the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Court may be} pleased to issue a Writ order'or direction more particularly one in the^nature of WRIT of MANDAIvIUS declaring the action of the Respondent^{Nos.2and 3 herein} in removing the installed Statue of NAGULOORI MEDCHAL^{NARSIMHAwhois} the father of Chairman/President of the Petitioner^{Association on Chilkalguda} Park, Secunderabad, and the same was^{permitted/accorded by the Respondent} No.3 vide its letter No.A/5889/TPS/HO/GHMC/2014 dated^{21-1-2015as illegal,} arbilrary, bad and void abinitio and set aside the same and^{consequentlydirect} the Respondents 1 to 3 qot to interfere/remove the^{installed Statueof} NAGULOORI MEDCHAL NARSIMHA who is the father of Chairman/President^of the Petitioner Association on Chilkalguda Park,^{Secunderabad.}

¶34

¶35

l.A.

¶36

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in} the filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleasedto "affidavit grant Stay of removal bt installed Statue of "NAGULOORI MEDCHAL NARS|MHA" who is the father of Chairman/President of the Petitioner^Association on Chilkalguda Park, Secunderabad,^pending disposal of the^{main Writ petition.}

¶37

counsel for the Petitioner :sRl iTI.A.RASHEED(NOT PRESENT)

¶38

Counsel for the Respondent No.l : GP FOR itCPL ADMN-URBAN DEV

¶39

Counselfor Respondent No.2&3 : SRI G.iIADHUSUDHAN REDDY, SC^{FOR GHMC} .p The Court made the followingr ORDER

,1,

1l'

//,j

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

¶45

WRIT PETITION 0.17247 of 2015

¶46

ORDER:

¶47

This writ petition is liled seeking following relief:

¶48

"....to issue an^{appropriatewrit or direction and} more particularly one in the nature of Writ^of Mandamus declaring the action of^the respondent Nos.2 and 3 herein in removing^the installed statue of "NAGULOORI MEDCHAL NARASIMHA" who is the father^of Chairman/ President of the^petitioner association on Chilkalguda Park, Secunderabad and^the same was permitted/accorded by respondent No.3 uide its letter No.A/5889/TPS/HO/ GHMCl2014 dated 21.01.2015 as illegal, arbitrary and^{prays to} direct respondent Nos.1 to 3 not^to interfere/remove the installed statue^of "NAGULOORI MEDCHAL NARASIMHA"^{who is} the father of the Chairman/President of^the petitioner association."

¶49

Sri G. Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing^{Counsel for}

¶50

respondent Nos.2 & 3/GHMC is^present.

¶51

No representation on behalf of the^{petitioner despite listing} the matter under the caption "For Dismissal".^{It appearstlat} petitioner has no interest to pursue the matter.

¶52

¶53

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non_ prosecution. No order as to costs.

¶54

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shalr stand dismissed.

$ i

f&ri

rk:

*. m#

itk'

VIJAYA LAXMI* REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII

¶63

¶64

To,

¶65

I OFFICER \ 1. One CC to SRt M.A.RASHEED, Advocate. tOpUCl 2. Two CCs to-QLlOR MCPL ADMN_URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of

¶66

ONE CC tO SRI G.MADHIJSUDHAN REDDY, SC FOR GHMC. TOPUC]

¶67

Two CD Copies.

.? BSK

$.\

.rts. :r :. i+, sh t ! #F

s l*r#

E& * s

ilB: #fr

ft+. F#.n. ,l*: .t s#h

altE .s f;F

r&F

HIGH COURT

{ft. + *FF r&. ##t rk. &Fit

DATED:09/09/2025 ;

ORDER

WP.No.17247 of 2015

'rA
'{ il L S
(
(
)$'(
o z
,Til ilIT il6
(r)
)

-
PAT

¶91

D]SMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶92

+
"dd
#tr

¶93

tig.

Naguloori Narsimha Welfare Association v. The State of Telangana Rep.by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naguloori Narsimha Welfare Association v. The State of Telangana Rep.by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Jitender Singh Vs The State of Telangana

Khaja Hussain, Vs The Government of Telangana

Gadapa Kanthamma Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal

Rajaputra Lakshmi Bai Vs The State of Telangana

R.Narender Vs the State of Tg., Rep by Its Prl.Secretary and 7 Others

R.Srujan Kumar Reddy Vs R.Kala Bai