The High Court of Telangana granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition pursuant to the prayer of counsel. The writ petition was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
, ''.,].: f i i I i
[3255 I
; : ii i. i ! t, tf i! . I. I I
i arI I i
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA ( s p" i *L?ilio#fffi? i cti o n ) "
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTO BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVANKUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 30676 OF 2025
Between:
Modem Siva Shankar, S/o. Babu,Age.30 years, Occupation.Agriculture, Caste. S.T. (Koya) Fl/o. Brahmanpalli Village andMangapet Mandal, Mulugu District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High Courtmay be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction,more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus, todectarethe action of the 4th Respondentin not taking any action on thepetitioners complaint dated19-09-2025 which was sent to Respondent No. 2 throughregistered post seeking to take proper and appropriate action against the RespondentNo.5 for illegally dug a canal with a JCB in his agricultural land to anextent of Ac.4.2O gts in survey no. 4411613, situated at Brahmanaplli village,Magapet Mandal, Mulugu district 08-09-202and on the next day morninghe askedhim his illegal act, then he started abusing him in a filthy language and further threatenedto kill him with the shovel is as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutionaland for other reliefs and violationof articles21 of the Constitution oflndia and consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 to take steps on thepetitioners complaint dated 19-09-2025
lA NO: 1 OF 2:025
Petitior under Section 151 CPC' praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders fcrthwith directing Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 to take steps on the petitioners cornplaint dated 19-09-2025 pending disposal of the main case
Counsel for ttre Petitioner: SRl.pULLA RAO YELLANK!"
Counsel for ttre Respondent Nos. 1to4: Gp FOR HOME
Counsel for tlre Respondent No.5:-
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION N0.30676 of 2025
ORDER:
Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned
counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand
closed. No costs.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. U. SUDHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR6
(
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1' one cc to sRr. PULLA RAo YELLANKT Advocate topucl 2- Two ccs to Gp FoR HoMe .-'- .Hiqr,-court '"'v ili[;3i,te of rerangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies
BM
k-PVL
I I ..,.:l: ,,,;'J
*a
i i' I j I I rit: ti t
t I i t. : i
HIGH COURT
DATED:'l5ll 012025
ORDER
f
i1 TI1E S
L.)
{ 1 1 t{li 2rl[
WP.No.30676 of 2025
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUTCOSTS
*7
CY-/
"P
#d
Modem Siva Shankar
State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary for Home department
Superintendent of Police, Mulugu District
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mulugu
Station House officer, P.S. Mangapet
Yaggadi Satyanarayana
N.V. Shraavan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
