Disposed
Anitha Pagadala v. The State Of Telangana
Telangana HCWP/22095/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3255 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 22095 OF 2024
Between:
Anitha Pagadala, W/O Narsingh Rao Aged 63 Years Occ. Home Maker Rl/O. Flat No. 503, sth Floor Vasavi Sri Vasam Apartment lt/edipally, Hari Vihar Colony Pezaadiguda Rachakonda T.S - 500039
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the Responddnt No. 3 considering the petitioners representation dated 24.07.2024 for not conducting the enquiry against the Respondent No.4 who declined registering crime against the Respondent No 4 herein for causing mental agony and intruding into theprivacy of a woman i,e petitioner ararnging C.C cameras herein which is illegal, arbitrary in the interest ofjustice and pass such other order or orders as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances in the interest of justice. Consequently direct
respondent 2 and 3 to register the complaint made by lhe petitioner dated 24.07.2024 against respondents 4 and and take up the rnvest gation there of pending disposal of the main writ petition in the interests of lur;tice
lA NO:'l OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci.cumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pteased be pleased to permit the petitioners to implead the proposed r,)sipondents No. 5 to 7 as necessary parties to the main WP. No. 22095 of 2024 itnd lA and pass such other order or orders
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. L N BHADRIRAJU
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : AGP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : --
The Court made the following: ORDER
it
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVANKUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.22095 of 2024
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the Pctitionc'r and learnedAssistant Government Pleaderfor HomeaPLrearingfor respondent Nos.1 to 3. With their consent, this writpetition is beingtake-nup for disposal at the admissior"t stagc,
t
)
,1. On provious occasion, thc respronclent authorrttr.s arr clircctcd to pcrsonallv vcrif_r' rvl.rethc.r there is C.C.1'.V installed as per tl-rc conlplaint made bv the petitioncr, in the prescnce of the petitioner
I Ilecorrlirls tlrt's.rme, this writ petition is accordingl;t c[o5sd
9 . {itl-r thcsr. obst-rvations, this writ petition is closctl
lv{isccllantous aprplications, if anv pending, shall st:arrc1 closc.rl. No
orcler .rs to costs
SD,,.K.BHAVANI SWAMY {ss ISTANT REGI ,TRUE COPYII ' \ SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to SRI. L N BHADRTRAJU, Advocate [OPUC]
2 Two CCs to GP FOR HOITIE ,High Court for the State of Tetangana [OUT] Two CD Copies
PVL GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:1411012025
ORDER
WP.No.22095 of 2024
4 r $E SIA
15ru66
2 i
{
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the police inaction in responding to the petitioner's complaint regarding alleged intrusion of privacy by a neighbour's CCTV camera warranted judicial intervention.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Anitha Pagadala
The State of Telangana
The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Police Commissionerate
The Station House Officer, Medipally Police Station
Eashwar Prasad
N.V. Shravan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court