P. Abraham Lincoln Vs The State of Telangana

P. Abraham Lincoln, S/o P.A.Prabhu Das, Aged about 33 years, occ. Business , Rio H.No. 2-257l2A,Gandhi Nagar Colony Jadcherla, Village and lr,4andal Mahabubnagar District, Telangana

¶10

..PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana. Home Department rep by its Principal Secretary, Secretariat, Secretariat Buildings Hyderabad.

¶13

2 The Superintendent of Police(SP), Jadcherla, Mahabubnagar District, Telangana

¶14

The Station House Officer, Jadcherla Police station Jadcherla lVlahabubnagar District, Telangana

¶15

4 .G. l,4urali [t4ohan, s/o G. Narasaiah, aged about 34 years, Occ. Business, F|/o H.No. 2-25711, Gandhi Nagar Colony Jadcherla, Village and Mandal, lVahabubnagar District, Telangana.

¶16

P. Udaya Sri, w/o G. lt4urali ltilohan aged about 34^years,Occ House wife, Rio H.No. 2-257l1,Gandhi Nagar Colony Jadcherla, Village and N4andal lt4ahabubnagar Distrrct, Telangana.

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court^may be pleased to issue an approprrate Writ, Order or Direction, more^particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the Respondent^Nos.2 and 3 herein in taking action against the respondents^No. 4 & 5^{pursuant to} the complaint dt. 30-08-2025 in spite of repeated visits made by the^petitioner , as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust. and consequently, direct the respondent No.³

¶19

herein to register a criminal case against the respondent i No^,1 and 5 forthwith act upon the complaint dt. 30-08-2025 and take action in a I :ordance with Law

¶20

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in th€, I^'cuntstances stated rn the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Ccr l may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 herern to register a crirr i ia ,lase against the respondents No. 4 & 5 pursuant to the petitioner complain. lt. 30-08-2025, during pendency of the main Writ Petition wlth the interest of .1ust r e

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MANDA ADAM

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: AGP FOR HOMt:

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : ---

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

a.)

¶27

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

¶28

Writ Petition No.2941O of 2025

¶29

l'his writ pctition is filcd seeking the follou,ing prayer:

¶30

"...cleclannq the inaction of the Respondent Nos.2 ancl 3 herein in laking action against the respondents No.4 otld 5 pursuant to the complaint dt.30.08.2025 in spite of repeated ursits made bg the petitioner as beinq illegal, ctrbitrary and urtjust artd cortsequently direct respondent No.3 herein to reqister a ciminal case aqainst the resportdettts No.4 and 5 and fortfut'ith^{act upon the complaint dt.30.08.2025} and take action in ctccordance utith La ut..."

¶31

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. I to 3. With their consent, this writ petition is taken up for disposal. Notice to respondent Nos.4 and 5 is herebv dispensed u,ith

¶32

The facts of the case in brief as stated are that petitioner clairns to be absolute owner and possessor of house propertv admeasu ring 57 4 .28 sq.vds., i,it Jadcherla Village and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District purchased

¶33

)

¶34

: I i ! I il l l t: i

¶35

l ll

¶36

i I l

¶37

111 uide Doc.No.14956 12021 dated 15.11.202 1 regrstered the office of SRO, Jadcherla Mandal,^Iv ahabubnagar Drstrict. It is submitted that respondent No.^-1 atrd .5 s lro are pet.itiorrer's brother-in lan, and sister hi.rl⁽ ired a plan to grab the petitiorler's housc propel'tr/ <sup>rithollI z ir.r' tttanrtur of right zrnd locked the said house aud kept tht kc"'s in their custody, as thc petitione r is sta-r,ing in SanlirL Redd-r'for the purpose of business. In that regard, petitiorrr: has lodgecl a complaint before respondcnt No.2 requestinl, o take action argainst rcspondent Nos.4 and 5 on 30.08.2⁽ 25. Hon'ever, no action has been ir-ritiated till date. Q, :stioninll the same, the present writ petition is filed.

¶38

zl. The Sub Inspector ol Police. ..1:rr:herla l)olice Station. Mahabubnagar District has placr 1 a co1;,v of lnstructions through learned Assistant Government Plcader for Home and would submit that 1 asir-rg on the complainr of the petitioner d:r.ted 3t)^t8.2025, the resp<>ndent police has macle a GD Entrt, r nd taken up er-rquiry. During the enquiry, it is revealed t rt neithc:r- the pctitioner's mother nor the petitioner's si:;1t r is found in thc subject house "i-rh fn.t thel, arc residir-1 in^{USA. It is}

I

3

Y

further submitted^{that since the disputeis with regardto} house propertlr, the^{complaintol tl'ie petitioner was closed} :rs 'Civil in Nature' on^{23.O9.2O25and suggested the} petitioner to approach^{appropriate Court for redressaland} informed the samc^{to t}-rc petitiotlcr' As sltch respondent} No.3 cot-rductecl er-rquiry^{and closed tl-re complaintas 'Civil} in Nature'and the^{allegationthat respondentNo 3 has not} conducted enquiry^{is false and baseless atld accordingly} prayed to dismiss the^{\'rit petition.}

¶43

In that vieu' of the^{matter, since thc complaint of} the petitioner has^{already been closecl as civil in nature'} this writ^{petition isclisposedof s'ith ad irectionto} respondent authorities^{tofollorvd ueprocedureas} contemplated under^{of lalr' for further courseof action,if} any. Needless to^{state, petitionermay seek appropriate} remedy as availabie^underlau'.

¶44

Miscellaneous^{petitions, pending, if any, shall stand}

¶45

closed. However,^{thereshallbe no order as to costs'}

¶46

SD/- A.SREENIVAS REDDY ASSISTANT 6^REGISTRAR //TRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFICER

¶47

To, 1 The iii" bi"t" Princioal Secretary, 6it;langani^{Home HYderabad'Department SecretariatSecretariatBuildings'} 2 The Superintendent^ofPolice(SP) '^{Jadcherla'tr/lahabubnagarDistrict'} Telangana

¶48

7

¶49