Disposed

Dulam Naresh Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Oct 2025WP/30282/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a declaration that the respondents' threat to arrest him without registering a case was illegal. The Court, citing a prior order in similar circumstances, disposed of the petition at the admission stage, directing the respondents to follow due procedure and the petitioner to cooperate with the enquiry.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to follow due procedure before arrest; petitioner to cooperate with enquiry.

Dulam Naresh Kumar Vs The State of Telangana — Bail and Remand | Telangana HC (2025)

[^{3255 ]}

AN A rN^{rHEHrG H cou Rl+:f} jJ.mtrt}F::ofrELANG * (SPecial^Oril

¶9

w^{ED N E s D AY"ljlt^5t"xl} 5^{Rft:'.J'L"',"', J3 "}

¶10

PRESENT

¶11

THE^{HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEN.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR} WRIT PE^TITloN No: 30282^OF 2o25

¶12

ffi^{,,[He:.i:11l13n"?il31'?].ffi ft":PBY:':':'*"""::,:,;"::}

¶13

AND " 1. :, :"' u;:EBiLIf;^{:1133 ti, #?f"?[ ''' "'} ::' : -:: : -:,:: 2. J. i: ::rffi'^{ffi ::":, :il::::ililI" *;;;'r mnasarD s'irc'i} 45 The^{Station HouseOfticer'lll Town P S Karimnagar' Karimnagar District'}

¶14

45 The Karimnagar Station^{House Dislrtct otticer' Gangadhara PoliceStation' Karimnagar'}

¶15

.....RESPONDENTS

¶16

circumstances PetitionUnderArticle226oflheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe^{stated in the affidavitfiled therewith' the High Court maybe} writ or^{order or direction more particularly one in} -tlllo*'o'Us pleased^{to issue} "n 'O"op'nt" declaring^{the high handed action of the} the nature^{of WRIT o'} respondents^{4 and Sin threateningto search and arrest through Chennai Police} 41-A notice^{dl' 25-g-2[25at8-45 P M. and after receiving the explanation to the} 41A notice^{dt' 27-g-202;uy tf''" o"p'ty Superintendent of Police SCCIC' cCW} Head^{Quarter', ntnorn'g'r'Chennai is illegal' arbitrary' u nconstitutional and} tn]" Construction^{of lndia and infringed the Liberty of the} vlolation petitionerand^{of Article' conseque"'} '' '^{to O'*ct the respondents 2 to 5 not to arrest /notto} the^{petitionerwithout registration of any cftme aS} take any coe(civett"p" 'g'intt

the petitioner is only shown as __ suspect "vrps-r w rrrr(rLtr ithout an chennai police. y evidence as alleged by the

¶23

I.A.N O:1 oF2025

¶24

the arridavit petition ri eo in Under s Serup3ptl?i :: lr:^tT:l,:r] ,j ;,:"":,::ff il o_':'.r:.:::"J ,: direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to arrest lnot to t"r"" ,l;:::.-:^'^: the petitioner without registration of any crime ,, ,irT;,:::::ffp;:;r:j suspect without any evidence as alleged qrrsvcu ub y t hn e Ch unennai Police pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶25

Counsel for the petitioner : SRt MIRZA AZMATH ALt BAIG

¶26

Counsel for the Respondents : AGp FOR HOME

¶27

The Court at the stage of admission made the following ORDER

¶28

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEN'V'SHRAVAN KUMAR}

¶29

WRTT^{PETITIONNo.30282 of2O25}

¶30

ORDER

¶31

Heard learned^{counsel{or thc pctitionerand lcarnedAssistant} Government^{preaderfor Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5. with} their consent^{this writ} Petition^{is takcn up for clisposaIat the admissionstage}

¶32

itself.

¶33

2 This writ^{petitionis filecl scekingfollowing prayer:-}

¶34

"to tleclnre the^{high Lmndedrrctionol the responrlcnts 4 and 5 in} seaiclr^{unci utrcst tll,otr'glt Clennrri Police4'I-A rtoltce} ;rr;;;;{ti dt 25.9.2025^{at 8-45p M atLi nlte r i,,cioing tltc cxplt.nation to the} s:r-i ;"ib,^{rtt 27.9.2025tty tltt t'ttyrt.ry Sl4'ettntcrdtnt of Police} SCCIC,^{CCw lle(ld Qua;Lc;:s't'i'uri'ngui'Clannai' is illegnL'} iiuiiirr,,"l,r,r"nstituttinnl^{attti t'iol,tiolt of Articlc2l of the} "rl"!ili|r,r""ri't'nii-n n'na i'1'::i'n'g"l ttr Libarty^{of tlr-pe-titioner anrl} ;;';;;;,;r",i;i"^{rtitectthe rtspi'ttdltts ) to s not to nrrest /not to} !ln' yrtilitttrcr^{u'itlnutrcg.istralion of} tokr ':fr"r;ir;;;;';;,-po"uiin antl^L'oerciae 't'p'n1ir " r'''t is onttl stou'.n as suspect^{toithout antl} ,)ulrkne^{as allegerlby tlr ClrtnnttiPoltt t "}

¶35

Today^{when the matterhasbeen takcnup for hearing' learncdcounsel} for the^{petitioner. submits that in similar circumstancethis Court in}

¶36

W.P.No.30019of2025dated26.09.2025,passcc1thefollowirrgorder:-

¶37

"4' Hatting considcred^{tlrcnLtott: ftcts rt.ttl circumstance ontl} uithout^{express''gn'iy'oli'io"ott t.il,,'ttrttits of the cax'thisrurit} oetition is^{rlisposcdi1 ii'e'ti"5 lltrtsltonlcttls to lollou'duc} '"i.iri,',,*- *r,iiriir,,la^{rttttltr litt' l't[ott tnLittE otry .[urthet oct,ior,t,} i:;';;;';,;;:;:,;"l"l"it^{i' a"'} '""1' '.k"r thnt ttr Ttetitioner^shntt cooPerite^{ruithtlu enquirY"}

¶38

Learned counsel^{for tl-rc petitioncr further pray this Court to pass}

¶39

similar orders^{as passeclin W P No 300l9 of 2025clated26 09 2025}

LearncLi Assistant Government plcaclcr for Homc appearing lor f

¶45

respondents diri rrot dispute the same

¶46

Recording the submission made by the learnecl counsel appearing on either side and in terms of orders passed in w.p.No.30019 ot 2025 dated 26 09 '2025 ' this rvrit petition is clisposed of .,ir-ecting trrc responde^ts to follow due procedure co,iemplated under raw before taking ar*. fur.ther action on the petitioner' rt is arso macle crear that the petitioner srra, cooperate with the enqurry

¶47

Accorclingly, this writ petition is disposeri of. Misce llancous applications, if any pencling, shall stancl closcd Ther.e shalI bc rro orcler as to cosfs

OHD. ISMAIL REGISTRA

//TRUE COPY//

-,S TION OFFICER

The Principal Secretary, Department^{of Home, Secreta} Buildings. State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

¶54

The C-ommissioner of Police,^{KarimnagarCommissionerateKarimnagar'}

¶55

The Assistant commissioner^{of Police, KarimnagarRural, Karimnagar District}

¶56

The station House^{Officer, lll Town P.S.Karimnagar, KarimnagarDistrict.}

¶57

¶58

The Station^{House Officer, Gangadhara PoliceStation, Karimnagar,} Karimnagar District.

¶59

6 T;; CC;i; cp^{ron HOME, High court for the stateof relansana at} Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶60

z oir!-cc to s'Rt tvtiRzn^{AZIUATH ALI BAIG, Advocate[oPUC]}

¶61

Two CD CoPies

SA BS w

C.C. T0DAY

HIGH COURT

DATED:0 BtlOtZ}Zs

'( 3 i,] iiltj ii -:i.;i.
: ,1<br>-.,\ i
:.1:
0I rr[I 2tr6

¶71

ORDER

¶72

WP.No.3O282 of 2O2S

¶73

DISPOSING^{OF THE W.P}

¶74

AT^{THE STAGE OF ADMISSION}

¶75

WITHOUT^COSTS'

¶76

.oS'A w

Dulam Naresh Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dulam Naresh Kumar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Marri Ilaiah Vs The State of Telangana

B. Bhuvaneshwari Devi Vs The State of Telangana

Amit Kumar Singh Vs The State of Telangana

Vanamali Wellness Saloon and Spa Vs the State of Telangana

Vishnu Sharma Vs The State of Telangana

Venkannagari Mahender Rao Vs The State of Telangana