Petitioner sought parole extension. Counsel sought withdrawal. Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
No relief granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
[3255 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 33784 OF 2024
Between:
Amit Kumar Singh, S/o Amar Singh aged about 26 years occ Student r/o Plot No - 6 SRL Colony Mohan Nagar Kothapet R R Distric
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction, rnore particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, to declare the inaction of the Respondent No. 1 herein in passing orders on the representation dated 2111112024 submitted for the extension ofparole for aperiod of 30 days as being illegal, arbitrary, and unjust lt is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may direct the respondents to take immediate action on the petitioner's representation andgrant the extension of parole as requested
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to consequently lt is furtherprayed that this Hon'ble Court may direct the
//
respondents to take immediate action on the petitioners representation dated 2111112024 and grant the extension of parole as requested
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI MD FASIUDDIN
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE Szu JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.33784 OF 2024
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw tlre present writ petition and a letter dated 27.09.2025 has also been furnished to the Registry to that effect.
withdrawn.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. No costs.
SD/. P,C. SULEKHADEVI ASSISTANT REG
//TRUE COPY//
\
To,
ECTION OFFICER 1. One CC to SRl.MD FASIUDDIN, Advocate [OPUC] 2.TriroCCstoGPFoRHoME,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana.[ol.JT]
PVUPVL
(
HIGH COURT
DATED:0711012025
ORDER
WP.No.33784 of 2024
flc-'i ;:fN..:.<br>{
oo 2 t lA[ 2t2[
,.c
.l
* o
SP\T
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS Jrs ftl,l 2-G
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to extension of parole?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Amit Kumar Singh
State of Telangana
Director General and Inspector of Prisons and Correctional Services State of Telangana
Superintendent, Central Prison Cherlapally Medchal District
N.V.SHRAN KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
