Disposed

Venkannagari Mahender Rao v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Oct 2025WP/30246/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking direction to the Police to take action against respondents for illegal encroachment and extortion on the petitioner's property. The Court noted that final reports were filed in the related FIRs as 'civil in nature' and 'lack of evidence', and directed the Police to consider the pending complaint upon production of documentary evidence.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the S.H.O. Suraram P.S. to consider the complaint dated 26.09.2025 when documentary evidence is furnished.

Venkannagari Mahender Rao Vs The State of Telangana — Landlord and Tenant | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^32ss l

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original J urisdiction)

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN^KUMAR

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 30246 OF²⁰²⁵

¶8

Between:

¶9

Venkannagari Mahender^{Rao, S/oLateV.P. Ramachandraiah,Aged^about 52 y93.fs'} Occ;Business, Ri/o Flat^{No. 303, Baniara Prashanth, Road N-o' 12, BanjaraHills,} HvOeraUiO - sob 034,^{and presently rediding at 50269, Drakes Bay, Novi,Michigan,} Chicago, USA, Passport^{No. Y9025118.}

¶10

.....PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana,^{Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department'} Secretariat, HYderabad.

¶13

2.TheCommissionerofPolice,CyberabadCommissionerate,Cyberabad'

¶14

The Deputy Commissioner^{of Police, Medchal Zone, Cyberabad} Commiisidnerate,^HYderabad.

¶15

4.TheAssistantCommissionerofPolice'MedchalDivision,Cyberabad Commissionerate,^HYderabad-

¶16

The Station House^{Officer, Suraram Police Station, Cyberabad} Commissionerate,^Hyderabad.

¶17

K. Raia Reddy,^{S/o SivaRami Reddy, Aged about 4S.years' Partner'M/s} . - VL.n,li gn"tive. plot No. 534, Vive(ana-nda Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

¶18

7 . Mirz:a Ahmed^{Baig, S/o Mirza Osman Baig, Ag..ed about 54.years'.Occ'} ' ii;"i";;;, Fv; r-r.rib.i-zo, chanda Nasar, serilinsampallv Mandal, M.M.District

¶19

Ranoineni Srinivas^{Rao,S/o LateVenkataRamrll-urAged58} Y99F, 9T; " iil;ii;;:' Fvo n.ruoz-i 2li, Ramalavam street, Kukatpallv, M'M'District'

¶20

.....RESPONDENTS

¶21

Petition Under^{Article 226 of the constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavit filedtherewith,the High Court may be} pleased to issue to Writ, order^{or Direction more particularly one in the nature of} Writ of Mandamus^{declaring the inaction of RespondentNo 2 to 5 in considering}

¶22

ihe Petitioner electronic email complaint dated 23-09-2025 zr d postal complaints dated.26-09-2025 to take necessary action against the 6th o 8th Respondents and their men, agents claiming through them for their illega acts of committing organized continuous crimes making attempts of illegal encr: rchment by causing injury to make extortion and to grab petitioner property l ending civil suit in O.S.No.3S of 2018 in respect of Land admeasuring Acres 02-17.5 Guntas in Sy.no.328,Situated at Gajulramaram Village and Circle, () rthbullapur Mandal, Medchal-Malakajgiri District and pending investigation in FIF No.240 of 2o23 of P.S.Jeedimetla and FIR No.135 of 2023 of p.s.suraram er d failure to provide police protection to deprive petitioner life, liberty and propert as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 3004 of the constitution r f lndia and to direct Respondent No.2 to 5 to consider the petitioner complaint in rr :cordance with law.

¶23

!.A.NO:1 OF 202s

¶24

Petition under section isl cpc praying that in the circ rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pteased to direct to direct 2nd to Sth Respondent the petitioner erectronic emair comprainr dated 2309-2025 and postal complaints dated.26-09-2025 to take nec( ssary action against the 6th to 8th Respondents and their men, agents craiming il- .ough them for their illegal acts of committing organized continuous crimes makir I attempts of illegar encroachment by causing injury to make extortion and to grr ) petitioner property pending civil suit in o.s.No.3s of 2018 in respect of Land ac r reasuring Acres 0217.5 Guntas in sy.no.328,situated at Gajurramaram \ iilage and circre, Quthbullapur Mandar, Medchar-Marakajgiri District and per ( ing investigation in FIR No.240 of 2023 of p.s.Jeedimefla and FrR No.135 of 2)23 of p.s.suraram and failure to provide porice protection by taking strict actior in accordance with law.

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI NyAyA MITHRA LAW FIRM ABHTNAV MAHENDER REDDY KANDADI)

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 : Gp FOR HOME

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to g : _

¶28

The Court made the following ORDER

¶29

¶30

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KI'MAR WRIT PEf,ITION No.3O246 of 2O2S

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

This writ petition is filed questioning the inaction of respondent Nos.2 to 5 in considering the petitioner's e-mail and postal complaints dated 23.09.2025 &26.09.2025 respectively to take action against respondent Nos.6 to 8 and their men, egents claiming through them for their illegal acts of committing organized continuous crimes, making attempt attempts of illegal encroachment by causing injury to make extortion and to grab petitioner's property pending civil suit in O.S.No.35 of 2018 in respect of land admeasuring Ac.O2-17.5 guntas IN Survey No.328 situated at Gajularamaram Village and Circle, Quthbullapur^{Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri} District^{(herein after} referred as subject property) and pending investigation in Crime Nos.24O & 135 of 2023 of tleedimetla & Suraram Police Stations and to provide police protection to deprive petitioner's life, [berty and property.

¶33

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 5.

¶34

¶35

Learned Assistant Government pleader for lome placed a copy of instructions issued by Sub-Inspector of t olice, Suraram Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, ,vherein . it is submitted that the petitioner has sent complau Lt stating that respondent Nos.6 to 8 are making atterrL. rts to illegal encroachment and to grab his property pendi:r 3 civil suit in O.S.No.3S of 2018 in respect of subject pr,t rertSr pending investigation in Crime Nos.240 & 135 of 2023 o Jeedimetla & Suraram Police Stations. It is further submittec. that based on the above complaint, the respondent No.5 - I .H.O. of p.S. Suraram made GD entry and petition entry uid.e Ack. No. CYB/ SRRM_CYB/ 2Z O92S / O tl 1 t, dated 2t, . .O9 .2025 and that the petitioner except sending complaint (peli ion) by speed post, did not enclose any documents.

¶36

It is further submitted that for the purpose < f enquiry, the S.I. of Police called the petitioner. The petitiont: came to the Police Station on o5. ro.2o2s and reiterated the alt, gations made in his complaint, but did not produce €ury ( ocuments to substantiate his version. As such, the petitioner u,i .s informed to produce necessary documents and witnesses in s rpport of his uclaim. In reply, tJ e petitioner stated that he wo..: d come after

¶37

few days along with evidence. As such, the er quiry on his s. complaint is pending. With regard to two FIRs re terred by the_

¶38

¶39

)

¶40

petitioner urde F.I.R.Nos.24o & 135 of 2023 of Jeedimetla and suraram Police stations, F.I.R.No.240 0f 2023 0f Jeedimetla p.s. was transferred to suraram p.s. on point of jurisdiction and the same was registered as Crime No.322 of 2023. After completion of investigation, frnal report was fired before the jurisdictional court referring it as "civil in nature" and F.I.R.No.L3s of 2023, after completion of investigation frnal report was filed before the jurisdictional court referring it as "lack of erridence" and that respondent No.5 will take necessaqr action in accordalce wittt law on the petitioner's pending complaint dated 26.09.2025 as & when the petitioner produces evidence.

¶41

5' Learned Assistant Government preader for Home submitted that copies of notices sent to the petitioner / complainant dated 07.LO.2O25 in Crime Nos.322 & 135 of 2023 and copies of final reports in Crime Nos.322 of 2023, d.ated, 29.12.2023 e 135 of 2023, dated29.08.2023 fired on oL.ro.2o24 & 3r.10.2024 before the learned VIII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate _ cum _ Juvenile Court, Athvelli are placed along with instructions issued by S.I. of Police, Suraram police Station.

¶42

¶43

In that view of the matter, since the S.I. of police, Suraram P.S. filed the final reports in both the F.I.Rs, the petitioner may pursue remedies as available under law before the concerned

¶44

¶45

Court and as far as the pending complaint datr.r 26.O9.2O25 is concerned, the petitioner may furnish necessar r documentar5r erridence or other material in support of his c taim. If such material or document is furnished, the S.H.O. _ Suraram p.S. shall consider the complaint dated 26.09.2025 I rd appropriate action be taken stricfly in accordance with law.

¶46

WitJl the above observations, this writ peti! cn is disposed of with consent. There shall be no order as to cost l.

¶47

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous appti, ations if any pending, in this petition, shall stanb closed.

¶48

SD/- A.JAYAS IT TANT RE

¶49

//TRUE COPY//

¶50

;ECTION OFFICER

¶51

To 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secre\ari t,^S late of Telangana at Hyderabad.

¶52

The Commiss ioner of Police, cvberabad Commissio rat,^,, Cyberabad

¶53

The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Medchal Zone, Cybe 'abad Commissionerate, Hyderabad

¶54

The Assistant Commissioner of police, Medchal Division, )yberabad Commissionerate, Hyderabad.

¶55

The Station House Officer, Suraram police Station, Cybe-; bad uommtssronerate, Hyderabad.

¶56

Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of^-r rlangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶57

One CC to SRI NYAYA MTTHRA LAW F|RM (ABH|NAV t\4 \HENDER REDDY KANDADI) Advocate tOpUCI

¶58

Two CD Copies

SA BSR

HIGH COURT

DATED:0811012025

rt 1nE ,SIi
(Jt i , Jllt 2o26
('
t
,-^'r.*2,'..j)/
a-:::=i''

¶63

ORDER

¶64

WP.No.30246 ot 2025

¶65

DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS.

¶66

g\a \2-^{-O' 29>L}

Venkannagari Mahender Rao v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Venkannagari Mahender Rao v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Marri Ilaiah Vs The State of Telangana

B. Bhuvaneshwari Devi Vs The State of Telangana

Amit Kumar Singh Vs The State of Telangana

Dulam Naresh Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Vanamali Wellness Saloon and Spa Vs the State of Telangana

Vishnu Sharma Vs The State of Telangana