Writ petition challenging a municipal notice seeking to remove, alter or pull down a theatre was dismissed for non-prosecution after counsel stated there were no instructions to proceed; liberty granted to pursue appropriate steps and no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
li li l: I i: t. I i
t3383 I
ANA rNrHE HrGH'":lfj[?H]iffiil;=*-G
(sPe
tueen
*"-r^dhlJFJlt'$'-"x$1f,H,?$ffi
PRESENT
THEHONOURABLESRI JUSTICELN(MI NARAYANAALISHETTY
Between:
....'ETITIONERS
AND
KhammamMunicipalCorporation,Khammam,stateofTelangana,rep.byits Commissioner
.....RESPONDENT
PetitionUnderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith'the High Court may be pleased to issuean appropriate writ order or direction more particularlyone in the nature ofwrit of mandamusdeclaring the action of the Respondent in issuing order inNotice No.10/TPS/2015 dated 26:08'2015seekingto remove', alter or pull down the2nd Petitionertheatre as arbitrary, illegal' unjust' without jurisdiction' violative ofthe fundamentaland constitutionalrights guaranteed underthe constitutionof lndia, violative of principles of natural justice'contrary to the provisions of theHyderabadMunicipal corporationAct' 1955' and issue a consequentialdirectiontotheRespondenttodropfurtherproceedingspursuantto issuanceof the aforesaid Order
3
5
,n" ,*llJ,l"r["o"t section 151 cPc pravins that in the circumstances stared in ar rurrher ,r.:"H;:Trrr",:T petition, the Hish court may be preased to stay 20.08.201u ,.rr", o;;#"::::tthe order in Norice r'ro.ro,,ps Dols dared by the Respondent including,rer of the2nd petiticed down rner rheatre, pendins disposa; ;,;$j;ilT rrrorpr.r,ins Counsel for the petitioner : SRt S.SRINUAS REDD' Counset for thr: Respondent : SRI P.SRIDHAR RAO The Court made the following ORDER
\t
I I t I i
HIGIICOURTFOR TIIESTATE Or. TELANGANAAT TIIEIION,BLESRT JUSTICET,EXNTTNARAYAI{AALISI{E TY
DATEOF ORDER: 2g't2'2025
BITWEEN:
R.SatYanarayana
Sonsarrd2others
Petitioners
\
I AI{D
KhammamMuniciPal CorPoration 'iJf,: o, its commissioner'
t ResPonden
: ORDER:
Thiswritpetitionisfiledtodeclaretheactionofrespondentrn issuingOrder in Notice No'10/TPS/2O15'dated 26'08'2015' seeking to.remove, alter or pull down' the theatre of petitioner No'2'as illegal,arbitraryandcontrarytotheprovisionsoftheHMCAct'1955 and forconsequential relief'
2.SriS.SrinivasReddy,learnedcounselforthepetitionersand Sri P.SridharRao, learned StandingCounselfor respondent, are present.
2
2
Howev€:r, Iiberty is granted to the petitioners t steps' illcause survives' rhere sharr be no order jj::rlPPronriate Misce,aneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand crosed.
//TRUE COPYII
To
1. One CC to SRI S.SRIN IVAS
2. One CC b SRI P.SRIDHAR
3. Two CD ,Sopies
SA
PMK
fr*
oFFtcER ,/
r'
._
I I
HIGH C(]URT
DATED ::Zgt12t2O2S
5
3 11 t,ilfl 2o26
*
ORDER
WP.No.27l,4g of 2075
DISMISSING THE W.P
FOR NON - PROSECUTION
I WITHOUT C;OSrs
JKS ttlsl',-e lr
3 provisions across 3 enactments
R.Satyanarayana Sons and 2 others
Khammam Municipal Corporation, Khammam, State of Telangana, rep. by its Commissioner
Lalitha Narayana Alisetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
