Mumtaz Yarud-Dowla Waqf. v. State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged inaction regarding unauthorized constructions by Respondents 5 and 6. Court closed the petition as Respondent Corporation had already removed the illegal structures.
What did the court decide?
No orders as to costs; miscellaneous petitions pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.
What the court decided
I3383 I
:. ;i ,i t7 :l rl
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTYFOURTHDAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICELAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRIT PETITION NO: 31317OF 2025
Between:
Mumtaz Yarud-Dowlawaqf., Rept by its secretatY,Md DastageerAli Khan, s/9 -!d Atiii Afi Khrn, ag"dbO ye'ais,Occ. Secretary of lMumtazYarud Dowla W.aQf,,Office oi trrtrrtai iiiudOowlaWaqf at Hno.5-9-919, Gunfoundry, Abids, Hyderabad-1'
...PETITIONER
AND
- 1 State of Telangana,represented by its Principal Secretaryto Government, Municipal AdministrationDepartme rnt Hyderabad.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mumtaz Yarud-Dowla Waqf.
- respondent
State of Telangana
- respondent
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
- respondent
Zonal Commissioner
- respondent
Assistant City Planner
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/31317/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court