Disposed¶20

M/S. Fateh Maidan Club, Hyderabad. v. Employees State Insurance Corporation, Hyderabad.

Telangana HC17 Sept 2025WP/27493/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, Writ Petition No. 27493 of 2005, Fateh Maidan Club v. Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC); challenge to Section 45-A ESI Act 1948 order dated 14.11.2005 (Proceedings APllns.1152-2162-1121155) demanding employer/employee contribution and altering service conditions; writ of mandamus under Article 226; petition closed on counsel's submission relying on interim order dated 26.12.2005 in W.P.M.P. No. 35299 of 2005; no costs; decided 17.09.2025 by Justice Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao; no merits adjudication, no precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; the writ petition was closed on counsel's submission and there shall be no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stand closed. ¶20

M/S. Fateh Maidan Club, Hyderabad. Vs Employees… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰⁴ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 27493 OF 2005

¶8

Between:

¶9

lV/s. Fateh Maidan Club, Larlbahadur Stadium, Hyderabad, rep by its Chairman Srr G. karunakar Reddy, S/o. G. Ramchandra Reddy, aged about 5'1 years' F,o Hyderabad ..pETrroNER

¶10

AND

¶11

Employees State lnsurance Corporation, rep. by its Deputy Director, Regional Office, 5-9-23, Hill For Road, Hyderabad.500 063.

¶12

...RESPONDENT

¶13

Petition under Articie 226 o'f the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring that the order passed by the respondent under Section 45-A of the Employees State lnsurance Act 1948, in proceedings No. APllns.1152-2162-1121155, dt. 14.11.2005, covering the petitioner establishment under the said provisions and demanding for payment of contribution of employer and employees by altering the existing service conditions as illegal, unjust, contrary to law, arbitrary and without^{jurisdiction,} and grant all consequential benefits.

¶14

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.K.JAYAPRAKASH RAO Counsel for the Respondent: SRI G.VENKATESHVARLU, SC FOR ESIC

¶15

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶16

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

¶17

WRIT PETITION No.27493 OF 2OO5

¶18

ORDER

¶19

Today, whei'r the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner inforrned this Court that, in view of the interim order granted by this Court on 26.12.2005 in W.P.M.P. No. 35299 of 2005, no further orders are required in this writ petition.

¶20