Writ petition by daily-wage employees of the RWS&S Department seeking regularization of services under G.O.Ms.No. 212 was withdrawn by counsel; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3304 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE FIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 6476 OF 2018
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the H(7h Court may be pteased to issue order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents i.e. from 1st to Sth for not regularizing our services as per G.O.Ms.N o. 212 Fin and Plg. Dept. dt.22.4.1gg4 even after specific Judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Dist. Collector Vs
i ! I t I
M.L.Singh and others 1998(2) ALT 5 (sc) dt. 06.02.1998. and atso in Sr:i B.Srinivasu u S/o Padmanabhaiah and Others Vs the Nellore Municipal Corporation, A.P. Government in SLP No. 12432t2O14 dated 17.08.2015 is arbitrary, cirpricious,'illegal and violative of Articles 14, 16, and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently declare that the petitioners are entitled for regularizatic,n of services from the date of completion of 5 years of service against the sanctioned posts as per G.o.Ms.No. 212 Fin and Plg. Dept dt. 22.4.1994 and on the strength of the Judgments of Hon'ble Supreme court and this Hon'ble High Court in WP No. 27967 of 2017 dt.1.9.2017
1A NO: 1 OF 2018
Petitic,n under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affida'/tfiled.in-support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Flespondent 1"t to sth to consider the representations of the petitione rs d1.22.05.20 1 7
Counsel forthe Petitioner: SRI.P. MARUTHI PRASAD
Counset for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES ll
The Court milde the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICENAMAVARAPURATESHWARRAO
WRIT PETITION No.6476 OF2O1E
ORDER:
Mr. P. Maruthi Prasad, learned counsel for thepetitionerc, seekspermission of this Court to withdrawthe present Writ Petition.
Permission is accorded. Z,
,3..Accordingly,this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applicationspending, if any, inthis
Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
,/TRUECOPY'/
ASSIS
6
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
BM BS
\ \
HIGH C;OURT
DATED:16/0912025
c
'\ll S
C;
?l Jril 2m
ORDER
WP-No.6476 of 2018
D]SMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONAS INFRUCTOUS WTHOUT COSTS
< 3 lal'l"u
2 provisions across 2 enactments
P. Nageswar Rao
B. Mamanadha Rao
K. Venkateshwarlu
Md. Iqbal
The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Panchayath Raj and Rural Development Department
The Engineer-in-Chief, RWS and S, Government of Telangana
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
