Disposed

Battu Limbadri v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC11 Sept 2025WP/27448/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Landowner sought survey and demarcation of his agricultural land after the Tahsildar failed to act on his F-Line application. The High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the Tahsildar to decide the application within forty-five working days by a reasoned order after notice.

What did the court decide?

Tahsildar directed to consider F-Line application No.DER022501190627 dated 13.06.2025, conduct survey/demarcation per law with notice, pass reasoned order within 45 working days; no costs.

Battu Limbadri Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

I^{s168 ]}

¶2

IN THE HIGH^{COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶3

THURSDAY, ."._TWO^{THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEIUBER} HOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN}

¶6

WRIT PETI^{TION NO:274/,8 oF 2025}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Battu Limbadri,^{S/o. Balaiah, Aged about 53 years., Occ ; Agriculture'R/o H No'3-} i;lz: i;il;"Gunor*rrv^{virragl,"ouonakatvlandal'Siddipet District'}

¶9

.....PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

l.ThestateofTelangana,Rep'byitsPrincipalsecretary'Revenue' D;r-ffi;;i se","iaiiii euridins secretaiiat' Hvderabad'

¶12

The^{District Collector,Siddipet' Siddipet District'}

¶13

The^{Revenue DivisionalOfficer' SiddipetDivision' Siddipet District'}

¶14

The^{Tahsildar, DubbakaMandal' Siddipet District'}

¶15

The^{MandalSurveyor, DubbakaMandal' Siddipet District'}

¶16

.....ResporuoeHrs

¶17

Petition^{UnderArticle226 oI lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filed therewith'the High Court maybe} pleased to issue^{an appropriate writ' order or direction more particularly one in} the nature^{of Writof lvlandamusdeclaringthe action of the RespondentNos'4 and} 5 in non-considering^{the F-LineApplication through vide No'DER022501190627'} dated.^{13.06.2025and non-conductingthe survey and demarcationon the land of} the Petitioner^{to an extentof land Ac'0 2050Gts in SurveyNo' 1523143211'which} issituatedatDUbbakaVillageandli,4andal,siddipetDistrictandnon-initiatingto fixtheboundariestotheagriculturelandofthePetitionerisillegal,arbitrary, unconstitutional^{and violationof Articles 14' 15' 21 and 300-4 of Constitution of} lndiaandalsoviolationofPrinciplesofNaturalJusticeandConsequentlydirect

¶18

the Respondent Nos 4 and 5 to consider the F-Line apprication through vide No-DER022501190627, dated. 13.06.2025 0f the petitioner and conduct the survey and demart;ation and fix the boundaries to the agricurture rand of the petitioner to an e):tent of Ac.0.2050 Gts in survey No 15231432/1 , which is situated at Dubbaka Village and [\rlandal, Siddipet District.

¶19

l.A.NO:'l OF 2025

¶20

petition Under section r5i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondent Nos.4 and 5 to consider the F-Line apprication through vide No DER022501190627, dated. 13,06.2025 0f the petitioner and conduct the survey and demarc;ation and fix the boundaries to the agricurture rand of the petitioner to an extent of Ac.0.2050 Gts in Survey No. 15231432/1 , which is situated at Dubbaka Vi'age and Mandar, Siddipet District pending disposar of the writ petition.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR

¶22

counsel for the Respondents : sRr L.RAVTNDER, AGp FoR REVENUE

¶23

The Court made the following ORDER

¶24

, I

¶25

TTIF] IIONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICB K. LAKSIIMAN} WRIT PETITION No.27448 of²⁰²⁵

¶26

ORA L ORDER:

¶27

Heard learned^{counsel fbr the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder,} learned Assistant^{GovernmentPleader fbr Revenue.}

¶28

Petitioner herein is clainring^{that he is the absolute owner} and possessor of^{the land admcasuringAc.0.2050 guntas} ln Sy.No. t523143211,^{situated at Dubbaka Villageand Mandal,} Siddipet District.^{In ploof'o('tltcsanre, hc has filedcopies of the} latest passbook^{atrcl titleclccd} Ile has submitted F-Line application^{vide l.D.No.TTD8R022501190627,dated} 13.06.2025 to^{respondent No.4 rvith a request to conductsurvey} and demarcate^{the subjectprcpeftyby fixingthe boundaries.} Despite receiving^{and acknowledging the said F-Line application,} respondent^{No.4 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said} inaction of^{respondentNo.4, the pctitionerfiledthe present writ} petitiot.t.

¶29

Whereas, Mr.L.Ravinder,^{learned Assistant Govemment} Pleader for Revenue,^{on instructions,wouldsubmit that respondent} No.4 will consider^{the said F-l-ine applicatiotl submitted by the}

¶30

¶31

¶32

petitione r slrictly in accordance with the pr.oceclure laid down under law

¶33

4' In the right of the said discussion, this writ petirion is disposed o I directing respondcnt No.4 to conside r. the F-t,ine application vide I.D.No.DERO 2250t190627, dated 13'06'2025 sub,ritted by the petitio.cr with a request to conduct survey and demarcate the subject propefty by fixing boundaries, strictly in ac,:ordance with taw by putting the petitioncr.and all intcrested parties on notice and affording them an opportunity. If respondcnt N,t.4 is not inclined to accept the request made by.the petitioner, he shalt assign specific l.easons, pass a reasoned order and comrnur.rir;ate the same to the petitioner.. He sha, corrplete the entire exercise within forty-five (45) wolking days tiom the date of receipt of a co;ty of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶34

As a scquel, miscellaneous pctitions pending, it. any, shall

¶35

stand closcd

¶36

SD/.MOHD.^ISMAIL UTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY'

¶37

ECTION OFFICER

¶38

¶39

The Principal Secretary,^{Revenue Department, Secretariat Building'} Secretariai, State^{of Telangana at Hyderabad.}

¶40

The District Collector,^{Siddipet,Siddipet District'}

¶41

S. fn" Revenue^{Divisional Officer, Siddipet Division, Siddipet District'}

¶42

The Tahsildar,^{llubbakaMandal, Siddipet District'}

¶43

The Mandal Surveyor,^{Dubbakalr,4andal,Siddipet District}

¶44

o. two CCs to GF'^{F6RREVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad. [OtJT]

¶45

One CC to SRI RAPOLU^{BHASKAR, Advocate} [OPUC] 8. Two CD^CoPies; SA GJP +&/

¶46

HIGH COURT

¶47

DATED:1 110912025

¶48

z
P il6
22 5[
,/t
.. a.
D!s,,

ORDER

WP.No.27448 of 2025

DISPOSING OF THE W.P

WITHOUT COSTS.

Battu Limbadri v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Battu Limbadri v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Banoth Dwali Vs State of Telangana

Vivekavardhini Educational Society Vs The State of Telangana

Vasi Deva Kumar Vs State of Telangana

Kukkali Balamani Vs The State of Telangana

Prv SriramReddy @ Peddireddy Sreeram Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Pramod Kumar Agarwal Vs M/s. Shree Jagannath Steels Limited (In Liqn.)