Disposed¶38

Jameela Begum v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Sept 2025WP/26719/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

FIR registration mandamus writ closed after FIR registered; Jameela Begum v. State of Telangana; W.P. No. 26719 of 2025; Telangana High Court; Justice N.V. Shravan Kumar; decided 08-09-2025; Article 226; Article 21; Lalita Kumari v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2014) 2 SCC 1; Sections 323, 324 IPC; Section 151 CPC; complaint dated 03.08.2025; SHO PS Rajendernagar; SHO PS Attapur; Commissioner of Police Cyberabad; GP for Home; writ petition closed, miscellaneous applications closed, no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was closed after counsel submitted that the FIR had been registered on the petitioner's complaint dated 03.08.2025, miscellaneous applications if any pending stood closed, and no order as to costs was made. ¶38

Jameela Begum Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶38

Issue for consideration

Whether the Court should declare the inaction of Respondent No.3 in not registering the FIR on the petitioner's complaint dated 03.08.2025 as arbitrary, illegal and a violation of the Constitution, and consequently direct Respondent No.3 to follow the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P., take action on the complaint dated 03.08.2025 and register the FIR.

¶34

Court's answer

Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that, subsequent to filing of the writ petition, the respondent authorities had registered FIR on the petitioner's complaint dated 03.08.2025, and since no further orders were required to be passed in the writ petition, the Court deemed it appropriate to close the writ petition; miscellaneous applications, if any pending, stand closed, with no order as to costs.

¶37

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (Hon'ble Sri Justice N.V. Shravan Kumar) disposed of Writ Petition No. 26719 of 2025 filed by Jameela Begum under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus to direct Respondent No.3 (Station House Officer, PS Rajendernagar) to register an FIR on her complaint dated 03.08.2025 for alleged offences under Sections 323, 324 IPC, in accordance with the directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2014) 2 SCC 1. When the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that subsequent to filing of the writ petition the respondent authorities had registered FIR on the complaint dated 03.08.2025 and that no further orders were required. Recording the submission, the Court deemed it appropriate to close the writ petition; miscellaneous applications, if any pending, were closed and no order as to costs was made.

¶1

i I I l I I I t l- i I I I I

¶2

[^325s ]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD}

¶4

(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN^KUMAR

¶8

WRlT PETITION NO: 26719 OF 2025

¶9

Between:

¶10

Jameela Begum, W/o lvlohd Mirza Kaleem^{Baig, H.No.2-4-46N11301} ,^{Happy Homes} Towers, Uppalpaly, Attapur, K.V. Rangareddy,^Telangana.

} ...PETITIONER

AND

',,

The State of Telangana, Rep, by its^{Principal Secretary, Home Department,} Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana.

¶15

The Station House Officer,^PS Attapur,^{Hyderabad, Telangana -500030.}

¶16

The Station House Officer, PS Rajendernagar,^{Hyderabad, Telangana -} 500030.

¶17

The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad^{PoliceCommissionerate,Telecom} Nagar Extension, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana 500032:^ - -._-. ...RESPONDENTS

¶18

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution^{of lndia prayingthat in the} ,.' circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the High Court may be} i pleased.to issue a Writ of lvlandamus or any other appropriate writ, order,^or directioir, directing Respondent Nos.^{1, 2, 3, and 4 to forthwithregisteran FIR} tii based on the complaint dated 04/08/2025^{submittedby the Petitioner, Jameela} Begum, against The culprit,^for the^{alleged offences under(e.9.,Sections323,} 324 IPC), and to conduct a thorough,^{impartial,and time-bound investigationin} accordance with law, thereby upholding^{the Petitioner's fundamentalrightto} justice under Article 21 of the Constitution of lndia, as mandated by the Hon'ble i- Supreme Court in LalitaKumari^v. State^{of Uttar Pradesh ((2014) 2 SCC1).} ti. lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that^{in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} issue an interim order or direction, directing^{RespondentNos. 1, 2' 3, and 4 to} forthwith register an FIR based on the^{complaintdated 0410812025 submittedby} the Petitioner, Jameela Begum, against^{the culprit, for the alleged offencesunder} [e.g.,^{Sections 323. 3241PC1, and to take immediate steps to ensurethe safety}

¶21

I t i i i II i i { Ii i iI I I

¶22

¶23

and security of the Petitioner pending the final disposal r I this^{writ petition,in} light of the medical evidence submitted and the urgency oF ihe matter, as upheld by the principles in LalitaKumari v. State of Uttar Pradesh l(l.014) 2 SCC^11. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. MD. FASIUDOIN

¶24

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

a I i t

.:i,

// 1'.

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRITPETITION No.267t9 of2025

¶32

ORDER:

¶33

This writ petition has been filed seeking the foltowing prayer:-

¶34

"to ileclare the inaction on the part of the Respondent no.3 in not registering th! F.I.R on tlu basis of complaint dt 03.08.2025 gtoen by the petitioner, being nrbitrary, illegal and ztiolation of Articte-3\A if the Constitutiort of Intlin and consequently direct thi respontlent no.:3 to follow the directions gioen by tlrc Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalitha Kumai as Stnte of U P and take action on tlu complaint dt 03.0g.2025 gttten by the petitioner and registcr the F.t.R."

¶35

Today when the matter has been takerr up for hearing, leamed coursel for the petitioner submits that subseq ucn t to filing of the writ petition, respondent authorities l.rave registered FIR against the petitioner's complaint dated 03.08.2025 and subn-rits that no further orders are required to be passed in tiris writ petition.

¶36

Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and since no further orders are required to be passed in the writ

¶37

petitiorL this Court deems it appropriate to close the writ petition.

¶38

Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. Miscellaneous

¶39

applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

¶40

SD/. S.MALLIKARJUNA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (2

//TRUE COPY//

I 'I

SECTION OFFICER

To,

'1. The State of.Telangana Rep. by its principal Secretary. Home Department,

¶46

^^{Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana.}

¶47

The Station House Officer, pS-Attapur, Hyderabad, Telangana _500030. 3. The Station House Officer, PS Rajdndern'agar, Hyderabad", Telangana _ 500030.

¶48

¶49

¶50

4 I he Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Police Comnri ;sionerate,Telecom
Nagar Extension, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telargana I )0032.
5. on6 cc to SRl. MD FASIUDDIN Advocate toPUCl
6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOIVE, High Court for the State r f Telangana. [OUT]
7. Two CD Copies t, ,
CHR t
Ia i,
TKS
I
ii.:
9y
i
tI
i;!:l:II
ti a'.
,ai:
I
i;r
+ri
I I 'Itr,
tf{'-
t l:
lfi:
l ttl :t,
I rl'
.l,R. .,i.
lr!'
..,
l 't-{rI
ftt'
r li.
;l