The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as there was no representation for the petitioner on the date of hearing despite the matter being listed for dismissal. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE ELEVENTHDAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICENAGESHBHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 25591 OF2021
Between:
It4/s. Charminar Foods, Plot No.12-14,Phase lV, lDA, Patancheru,Sangareddy District - 502319 Represented by itsAuthorized Signatory, [t/r. RonakGupta.
...,.PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith,the High Courl may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction,more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaringthe action of 3rd Respondentin issuing Letter No.Ptot No. 12 to 14lTSl|C/PTC/IALA/2019Dt. 20.05.2020 to the Petrtioner to pay an amount of Rs.3,38,29,450/-towards process fee for sub-divisionfor an extent of 428'16.80 Sq.meters of PlotNo.12and 14 along with GST Rs.60,89,3011 as being illegal, arbitrary andviolation of Articles 14 and19 of the Constitution of lndia and consequentlyset aside the same and direct the
7
Respondents not to insist for payment of any sub-division charges/fee from the Petitioner, except to mutate the name of the petitioner in the records of the 1st Respondents without any delay, interest of justice.
I.A.NO:1 OF 2021
Petition Under section'1 51 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner including demand for payment of any sub-division charges/fee from the petitioner in pursuant to the Letter No.Plot No.12 to 1 4/TS llC/PTC/IALA/20.1 g Dt. 20.O5.2020, in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ROHIT POGULA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: SRI M.SRIKANTH REDDy (SC FOR TGIC)
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : G.P FOR INDUSTRIES
The Court made the following ORDER
/; ,/./
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE NAGESHBHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITIONNo.2 5591 0F 2021
ORDER
:
As a sequel thereto,miscellaneouspetitions pending, if any'
shall stand closed.
SD/. L. LAKSHMIBABU UTY REGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY//
ECTIONOFFICER
\
to ,1. ,*o cc's to G.p FoR |NDUSTRIES, High court for
Stateof Telanganaat
SA
GJP o
I I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1110812025
1'd t .'j ;
oe -=:-\ .<br>t;
i 24 ffP rrq
T
D a
ORDER
WP.No.25591 of 2021
DISMISSING THE W.P
FOR NON_ PROSECUTION
WITHOUT COSTS.
"h,f\bN,
1 issue framed by the court
Was the writ petitioner interested in prosecuting the matter?
It4/s. Charminar Foods
Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited(T_SllC)
The Zonal Commissioner, Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited(TSIlC)
The Commissioner, Industrial Area Local Authority (IALA)
The State of Telangana
Nageshbheemabaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
