The petitioner withdrew the writ petition challenging enhanced wheeling charges with permission of the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
ON NO: 211 920F 2004
Between
M/s. Katatiya .C_"Jng1l Qugaq & lndustries Ltd., rep by Executive Director, regd. oftice at 1-10-140, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad_Sooo2o.
...PETITIONER
D
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in seeking to levy and collect enhanced wheeling charges at 6.4o/o in kind and 0.45 ps. in cash i.e., 24o/o as against the previous rale of 2o/o as arbitrary illegal and in violation of Article 14 of the constitution of lndia and to consequenfly direct the Respondents to desist from levying and collecting wheeling charges in excess of 2 o/o of the delivered energy in kind.
l.A- NO. { F 200a(wP MP. NO | 277 56 0F 20041
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents not to disconnect power supply to the petitioner levy and collect wheeling charges at 2o/o of the delivered energy, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. SNEHA JAIN, REp. FoR sRtJ.N.BHUSHAN
counsel for the Respondent No.1: sRl p.pRASAD, sc FoR TGERC
counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 5: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICENAGESHBHEEMAPAKA
UIRIT PETITION o-2LL92 0F 2o,o,4
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up forhearing,Ms Sneha Jain, learned counselrepresentingSriJ.N.Bhushan, learned counsel forpetitioner submits that in view of the judgment passed. by the Hon',bleSupreme Court in civil Appeat No.4569 of 2003seeks permission of this court to withclraw this Petition.
',vithdrawn.There shall be no order as to costs'
Miscellaneous petitionspending, if any, shall stand
closed
SD/.C ASSISTANT ,,TRUECOPY" OFFICER
4.Two CD CoPies
BSR TKSw
/ Ia
iI I t )I
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0710812025
ORDER
WP.No.21 192 of 2004
't FtE Sfri
7
a
2twm{
*
-cHE
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRAWN,
WITHOUT COSTS
C .16et:&
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Katatiya Engineering & Industries Ltd.
The A.P. Electricity Regulatory Commissioner (ApERC)
Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited
The Chief Engineer (Commercial & IT), A.p. Transco
Central Power Distribution company of A.p. ltd.
Southern Power Distribution Company of A.p. Ltd.
Nagesh Bhemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
