Smt. Penuballi Janaki Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Penuballi Janaki, W/o Suryam, aged^{about 43 years old,} R/o Jinnelagudem, Rachannagudem Village, l,4ulkala Palli^{lt/andal,Bhadrachalam} Division, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its^{Principal Secretary, TribalWelfare} Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶15

2 The Agency Divisional Officer, Bhadrachalam^{Division, Bhadradri} Kothagudem District, Telangana.

¶16

3 The Tahsildar, It4ulkala Palli^{tVlandal,Bhadradri KothagudemDistrict}

¶17

4 Sri Eerla Ram lt4ohan Rao, S/o Bhadradri,^{aged about 38 yearsold, R/o} Jagannadhapuram Village, Mulkala^{Pallil,4andal,BhadradriKothagudem} District.

¶18

.RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of Ihe Constitution^{of India prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filedtherewith,the High Courtmay be} pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more^{particularlyone in the nature of} WRIT OF IVANDAIVUS to directing Respondents^{2 and 3 to forthwith implement} the order dated 06.12.2016^{passed in LTR CaseNo. 6/2016/lVkp by the Agency} Drvisional Officer, Kothagudem, by restoring^{possessionof the land in Sy. No.} 116/30, extent Ac. 3.08^gts at Rachannagudem^{Village,to the Petitioner is highly} unjust, un warranted, arbitrary, illegal and^{violative of articles 14, 21 and 300-A of} the constitution of lndia and^{consequentlydirect the 2nd and 3rd respondents} decide petitioners pending appeal therein,^{in accordancewith law.}

¶20

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the ci lumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cot t. may be^pleased to direct the respondents not to allow any alienatron, Iease o Llrther encroachment of the land in Sy. No. 1 16/30. Ac. 3.08 gts, situated at Ra c rannagudem Village. and to ensure that stalus quo is maintarned over the land u r il final disposal of the writ petition and pending disposal of the marn Writ Petition

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI PANGA SIVANARAYANA

¶23

Counsel for the Respondents No.1&2 : GP FOR SOCIAL V/ :LFARE

¶24

Counsel for the Respondents No.3 : GP FOR REVENUE

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

'i

R'fl-

.,i,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶30

WRIT PETITIoN No. 23632 oF 2o25

¶31

ORDER:

¶32

Pr:titioner seeks a directior-r to RcspondenLs 2 and 3

¶33

to forthn'ith rmplement the order dated O6.12.20L6 in LTR Czrse No. 6/2016/MKP u,hereb-t, ancl nhcrcunder the 2Dd respondent

¶34

Agenc-r. Division:r[ OflLcer, Kothagudem dirccted the^:,r(] responclent^'['ahsilrlar to restore the schedule propcrt_\ i.c. Acs.3.08 gLlnt:rs rn Survey No. 116/3U in Rachan n agr-rcl e rn Village to petitioner or her legal heirs under the covcr of zr panchnam.r as per the Rules by removing any person bounci by t he decre e u,ho may refuse to vacate the same. The^'I'ahsildar rvas also directed to take action against the non tribal respondent u'ho destroyed the cashew plar-rtatior.r in thc said land undcr IPC by sending the proposals to the concerned. Against LIre said order, Appeal lies to the Additronal Agent to (iovernment i.c. Project Officcr, ITDA, Bl-radrachalam r,vithin 6O days fiom the date of receipt of the said order.

¶35

ri

¶36

Ii

¶37

1.1 tt is the grievance of petitioner that Respondents 2 and 3 r'rcither challenged the order by trling an Appeal nor implcmented the same cven after lapse of cight years.

-"\

2

lr

Therelore, potilioner is sLated to har,e submilted prcsentatron datccl I7 .O7.2023 requesting the atttl'ronties colr(:r rned to take ncccss,tr)'stc]l-s Lo isslrL'pattadar pass book in 1r(^r r.lame at thc earlicst possible: tirnc as thc s:rid document i , ,,'ssr:ntial tcr securc hcr legal rigl'rrs over the lzrnd :rnd Lo,: rsure proper registration i n officral recorcls.

¶42

2 . Hea rd Sri t). Shil'a Naravana, lcarnr r counsel for petitioncr :rs u-c1[ :rs ]carnoc[ C]ovcrnment Pleac-e -; for Social Wcllare and Rcvenue on bchali oI Respondents and 2 and Respondent No.3 rcspcc tivelv.

¶43

lr

¶44

fr

¶45

aving I'rcard learncd r:otrnscl or-r cjt r,:r side and having perused the material on record, it appc:r ;, no Appeal was preferred agerinst the orcler impugned by resp,r rdents belorc Ltrc l\ppcllatc Author-ir1 i.c. ['roject I)ircctor r :r ciid the1, imple ment the said ordcr. 1'hercforc, pctitior L r submitted represcntation dated 17.07.2025 to take necessii r I^{aclion and} issue pattaclar passbook rn respect of thc s :bjcct land. Hou'ever, responclcnts have not rnoved their littlr 'inger so far. In vieu, of the s:rme, it is appropriate for this Cc -rrt to^{give a} drrection to rcspondenLs to consicler the said repr'' l c'ntiltion and pass orders tl-rcreon ir-r a Limc fiame.

¶46

J

¶47

rl

¶48

4 The WriL PctiLion is therefore, disposed of drrectrng Respondcnts 2 and 3 lo consider representation dated 17.O7.2O23 subnutLed [rv petilioner and pass appropriatc ordcrs thereon, Ii.rllorving thc principles ol natural justicc rvithin lbur t'eeks from the date of receipt of a copy of tl-ris order. No costs

¶49

J MiscelLaneor-rs Applications, rf any strall stand

¶50

closcd

¶51

SD/. A. JAYASREE ASSISTANT BEGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// sEc#N oFFrcER /

¶52

To,

¶53