Writ petition seeking regularisation of 1000 sq.yds of government-assigned land purchased in 1966, claiming entitlement under G.O.Ms.No.166. The court found disputed questions of fact, noted the rival claimant Sri Suraj Kiran was not made a party, and dismissed the petition as devoid of merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Is2s5 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OFFEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEN.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRlT PETITION NO: 2432 OF2009
Between:
Kusuma Gopala Krishna, S/o. LateSmt.K- Rajyalakshmi,F/o.78/C,LIGH,Near
...Certrtoruen
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 of the constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filedtherewith,the High court may be pleased to declare the inaction of theRespondents in regularisingland admeasuring 1000 Sq.yds.situated in sy.No.128, Ii/allepally Village, AsifNagar tr,4andal, I\4asab Tank, HyderabadunderGO trrls. No. 166Revenue (Assn POT) Dept. dt. 16-2-2008 in favourof the petitioneras the petitioneris aloneis entitled for regularization as he hasbeen in continuous possession and enjoyment of the said land since 1966 i.e fromthe dateof purchaseof the land videRegd. Sale deed, dt. 27th Day of December,1966, as illegal, arbitrary,unjustand violative of Arts..14, 21 and 300-4 of theconstitution of lndia and consequentlydirect the respondents to regularize. the saidland in favour of the petitioner as the petitioner is alone entitled for the s'ame.
LA. NO: 1 OF 20ll 9l!.1tPMP. NO: 3106 OF 2009)
Petition ur,rjer i ection 151 CPC praying that in the circtrns;tances stated in the affidavit filec in s:pport of the petition, the High Court nay lre pleased to direct the Respor-rden s not to regularise the petitioner's land :rdmr',asuring 1000 Sq.yds. situated rn lj r No. 128, tt/allepally Village, Asif Na1;ar Mandal, IVlasab Tank, Hyderabac infe vour of any third party as the petitioner is zrlorre entifled for regularisation of 'lre .;i,id land, pending disposal of the main writ peti,ion.
Counsel for the Petititrner : SRI G.S.PRAKASH RAO (NOT pFlESEtJT) Counsel for the lles6rondents No.1to3 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Res6rondent No.4 :
The Court made the 1'(,llowing: ORDER
THII r-roNOURABLll SRr TUS'frC[ N.V.SIIRAVAN KUMAR
WRI'I'l'llTIl'ION No.2432 of 2009
ORDTJR
'['his writ pcl.ition is filccl st:ckirrr; tirc krllorving pravcr
"lo declnrc tlrt inm'tiort of tltt llrsyoudcnts in rcgulnrisittg lnnd rultrrcnsrrring 1000 Sq.yds, sitrrntetl in Sy N0.128, MolLcpnlLy Village, AsiJ Ntgar AnandnL, h4nsrth't nnk, llytlerabad uruler G.O. ItAs.No.166 Rerenue (Assn.P()'t') l)cyt , dt 16.02.2008 tn .fntour of t.hc petiLioncr ns tfu pctil.iorLt'r is rrlotrr, is ctttrlled lor rcgtlnrrsnt.ion ns ltc luts bt'Ltn itt con[irtttot.rs ltosst'ssiorr ntttl cnjtnltuent ol the snid lntul suttc 1966 i.c., frorn tlu, rlnla of ptrrc.lutse o.l tht lmd uide Itc,gd. Sn/r, tlc((l dl 27th l)nt1 o.l i)tcttrr[tu, 19b6, ns illagal, ubrtrnry, rttrjtLst rtrrtl t'iolnliu o.[ Arls'1,1. )l nttr[ 300 A of t]t? constittttrott of Itu{trr nnLl t'onscqutttlltl dirtcl tlrt tt's1to11111111y. lo rtctrl nst llrc snid lartrl in.[nt,orrr of tlr rcLitiotttr ts lltt ttLtilrortrr ts nloru, ttrlttlL,tl l'or llt sttttt' ."
*-
datecl.190 .l()( 1. itatirlt, that, lto l)(,l.utissiolt (a11 b.' !,i,ur[€,'l as thr:1and is classirr,,rl :,(,ovcrnrucr-iL l,;urci ((l.ContorurcnI l'..1o I ISI l,ancl). Irut'ther c.l:(, , I l(' pctitione r is tir.rI orrc Sri.Sura.j Krnrr.r lr:r ciarr-ning to bc' thc, ou r,,r ,i llrc lancl aclntcasrrlinr, (r()0 sq-r,ariLs ,,11 acc.rrt to the petiLioncr'': p : pc-Lv is tryirr5i to r-,rab thc p<ttitioner's p.(.rr(rtJ,, thus, the pel,itioncr' :r, 1 t r' llte gutclclirrcs issr-Lcc-l in the C,,t) .,,i..iJo.l(r6 dated 16.02.200"q r.r -(' ,rpplicaLior-rs rlatctl 20.11.200E a'r,1 ?.,.1212.008 for. rcSulanzJ i(1r-o\ cvcrl', Lhc sarrri' i:; nol consicler.t,cl [r.. t]-r: ri:spondent autholitiL,:. , ir,,"'r.'c[ bv Lhi,sair.l rn.rcIion, this rrrr.it [,t. i io r is lilccl
I lL ri,r, ir,,tt tlrt. nt.ttl('l itJ. lrr-,cLr [akt n r] lr loJ. lt-'.untt),, ltonc aPPeaICLi l(rl t' lrr'liLionet
leo , r t tcd " Gottl flo rcltresentntion . Pltndr:t. for turit petilioner ond l.ruu.r] the
,,-^ ^,'1,!,,f,yllett.r.tlrcltet.iiir:ttis.[or n tlirccliott to regrrlnrize tt.t( ctntnr oJ ptltliortcr.is rut t.rlttrl ,,f 1000;i.y,lc rtt Sy.No.'128, Mnllepnlly Villogt, AsiI N,,,qn, U,r,,,lnl, Mnsnb l nnk. ' t ltnryar itr llre ruril ltt,liliott is nl:;o srutrq,rrtrri sinrilrrr. _LltrlasstlrrtglLl nni t,rttillattrt,trtof tlrc Tttliliottt:r ts consid:te , tltt prLr.ycr in llrt 14.l) ,,ttp,oi i,r,lup,:rttlert t ly hL, cot rsideratl.
M.P. is tlisnt issatl.,,
Miscellancotrs applicatiorrs, ii an.,, ponclirrg, shall stand closcd. No orrlcr as to costs
SD/- A. SRINIVASA REDDY A ISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 1 One CC to SRI G.S.PRAKASH RAO, Advocate. I UC] 2. fwo CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana louTI
To,
HIGH COURT'
DATED:1810212025
1 r.| t $f 1re
c (r
(
t
oo l tlf,flrY 2025 zo
*.
ORDER
WP.No.2432 of 2009
DISMISSING'I'HE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ?t 6 10 5 |,",,
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents' inaction in regularising 1000 sq.yds of land under G.O.Ms.No.166 in favour of the petitioner was illegal and arbitrary
Whether a direction to regularise the assigned government land could be granted when a rival claimant was not impleaded
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Kusuma Gopala Krishna
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
The District Collector & Magistrate, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad
The Mandal Revenue Officer, Asif Nagar Mandal, Hyderabad
The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad
N.V.Shravan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
