Petitioner sought cancellation of an alleged partnership reconstitution deed and enquiry into his representation to registration authorities. With consent, the writ petition was disposed of permitting the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy before the competent civil court, with miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32551
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 13040 OF 2013
Between:
V.Prakash, S/o: Narsaiah, Aged 43years, Occ: Business,R:/o H.No.9-1- 7 6177, Girmajipet, Warangal, Warangal District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to iSsue an appropriate writ, order or direction moreparticularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the actionof the respondents 1 and 2 in not conducting enquiry into the matter and innot canceling the alleged partnership reconstitution Deed dated 22-01-2000 vide document No. 592i2010 with the Office of the 2nd respondent executedin favourof 3'd respondentinspite of representation of thepetitioner dated 7-1-2013is illegal, arbitrary,null and void and consequently direct the respondents to conductthe enquiry and cancelthe alleged partnership reconstitution Deed dated22-1-2OO0 vide documentNo. 5g2t2O1O with the office of the 2nd respondentexecuted in favour of the 3'd respondent forthwith
t.A. NO:10F 213WPMP. NO: 16024 OF 2013
PetitionunderSection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled in support of the petition, the High Court may be ileasecl to direct the respondents1 and 2 to disposeof the representationof th,3 Petitionerdated 7- 1-2013 bydirectingthe respondents totake action asper the Provisions of RegistrationAct, 1908 pending disposalof the main Writpetition
Counselfor the Petitioner: SRI M. YESHWANTH KUMAR
Counselfor the RespondentNos.1 and 2: GP FORREVENUI: Counselfor the RespondentNo.3: SRI KOWTURU PAVANK{.JMAR
Counselfor the RespondentNo.4: SREENIVASA RAO RAVULAPATI The Courtmade the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SITI JUSTICI] N.V.SI{RAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITTON No.I3040 of 2013
ORDEII
lkrarcl lealned counsel for tht,' pr:titioncr anrJ learnc.l Assis[ant Govcrnrnr..nt Pleacler for Stamps and [ir:gistration appcaring [ot tespoudent No.1 an,.l 2. With thcirconscnt, this ttlit Pt'titiortis tlisPosctlol
" tltt, irction of tle respondettts-l nntl 2 itt nol trttttlttcttttg cttrlrrinl inlo tlre nnller tnd u't rtot crrnceling tlr tLltgul lnrtrtrrslttl rtt'ttnsliltrliort Dctt{ rlaled 22,01.2000 t,irle dot trttrttrl No.5t)?./?.010 l,tllr tlu'().!firt ol' tln' ?"r respondettt ext'ltted itt jti'ttttr ttl ,1"! rcsptttuk't tttsl.,tl( df rcprtscnlation of tl'te petitioner dnted i.1 )013 is illcgal, uhitnry,rtuLl nnd rcil nntl conseqtrcntlry direcl tha rcspotulctLts to rrtndtLt'.ttlu; cnquiry nnd cnucel the allcged pmtnersltip rctonslitt r [iort l)ecddtrLctl 22.1 .2000 t,idt rlocmtenl No.5922010 tpith lht ot'Jice of llrc)"trcsportdent cxcct.rLcd in faoour of thc 3'.d resprtttdcttt forllttlilh."
2
dcciclcd to scli au ar' lhc subjcct Lrl.opcrtv anLl rcspolll,tnt No.4 bt,ing the managing parlirer e;<ccu reci ..g;rc('nr(]nt of sale in favour. oI rt-.spontlcnt No.3 ancl therealte' disputLrs a*rsc bcLwr'.n the par[ies a.c] thc. pctiti.;rcr on 26.()7 l()l'l r'-rrr'11 lor,,.rr ,rrLice [. icsi,r.tlcnt No.3 a.c] iils. [o rc,sp.nrlent No.-1. lrurLlr,,r t.;rsil ol llrt, ltctiliont,r is that the rc,sponclcnt lf ri. l by supprcssi.g, tlr. i.rcts crccutctl par'r^ership rcccu.rstitu r io. clcec[ antl by mislcadi.l' tlrt' r'r'riisrrati.. authorities, got regist.rccl the sa^re as Docur.rrcrrt N.,r92 .ri 2010 c{atcrr 22.0r.2000. ThereaLfter, peLiti.ner on 07.01.2013 ,r.rrle r.pr.st'rrtatio. ;Lrrrl requcsted rcspontle.t Nos.1 antl 2 to co.cluct t{r't;rilL'tl e.r1ui'r' i, th., uratLr-.r and ca,col thc par.r otr.ship rcconstitr,rlior: rjrt.il rl.rLi,ti ll.0l l(()(), horvcrrcL, thc satn<, s still pcn,-li:r11 for consrclcr.r I ri-r.. .ji11grit,r,.ri irr Ilrt,s.trrrt,, tiris writ prr:titicl. rs iiled.
5 i\ touirtt'l';s lilt.tl rrn b3ltatf oi respondellt No.2, rglcvalt ltrrr.ti6n is
extracted hcrcun, lcr:-
" l'lrrtt tlr rcltL.).llLtlto)t iutrd 01.0-1.2013 r.learly :;ltozos tlmt nl'tcr lr4t5t,o.t .) lytrtrs, tlrL; rortl lteLitioner is stekitig tc, conclut:t t.lctrtil trtrliLirry tt,illt t.conrrl lo tfic reconsLittLtioi tbed dnterl 22.0 L.)01() uluclt ;rri'. r(,gtstt,r.d tts document No.592,/2010. tt is lnuttblv strltntttttLl. tlttrt titc reItt:.l sotLght by tlLc zorit pr:titioner is
tr
-t
lol .otrl(t plnh.d uttdcr llu: Prooisiotts o.[ l*:gislrntiott Atl trtrd rln' otrLry rtnrdy trtnilnblt is la rt1t1trL411lt Llr cttntpt'tt'rti titil aourl."
this(-orrrt to apprroach thc courpclcnl('ivil (,orrlt
cithcl siLlc anrl t,ithout cxpressirlg an)r opil.ri()lr on thc merits o[ [he case, this rvrit pctitiorr is disposecl of r:na[.lrnll thc pctitiom:r kr sr:ck appropriate
rer.nt,dr .rs availabkr ur.ttlcr lart
B. \rLth tht: above tiirections, lhis Wlit [r,.:tition is tlrsPoscc] of.
Misct:ilant:ous .rprplications. if anr'pi:rrtiirrr,,, sirirll slancl closcri. No trriJc'r as
to c()!;Ls. /// I SD/.V.KAVITHA ASSISTANTREqSTRAR cr/
//TRUE COPY//
v
SECTIONOFFICER
\
to'.,. ,n. commissioner, and 1.G., Stamps ang Registration, Nampally, Hyderabad' i. ii;; J"i;i 5;o-i"si.ii'i-il,(hammam'Khammam district' 5. o;;"ct'ils-ri rra.nesn*inthKumar, AdvocatetoPUCl 'High-Court for the State of Telangana' at 4. Two CCsto GP tor. ii6'"nul, Hvderabad [OUTI 5 ij'#'bCi;5;Ko'wturuPavanKumar, Advocate[oPUC] .-. u 5'# 6d iI Sris-i"""irrsaRio iivutipati' Advo'ate [oPUC] 7 Two CD CoPies
TJ GJP $
I
HIGH COURT
DATE D: 1 810212025
ORDER
WP.No.13040 of20'13
1r'
q
oo 11 RP; Trlir
t
) ot ry,, ,' '!'
DISPOSING OFTHE WRITPETITION
WITHOUT COSTS 0Ot'gt' W
2 provisions across 2 enactments
V.Prakash
The Commissioner and I.G., Stamps and Registration, Nampally, Hyderabad
The Joint Sub-Registrar-II, Khammam
U.Venkat Rao
Soma Satyanarayana
N.V. Shravan Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
