Dismissed¶35

Paravastu Ramesh v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC17 Nov 2025WP/34771/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana HC, W.P. No.34771 of 2025 (K. Sarath, J., decided 17-11-2025): petitioner sought mandamus for cancellation of sale deed No.3664 of 2014 (Mahabubabad registrars) and cancellation of granite-exploitation licences (Mines & Geology officials), with an interim S.151 CPC plea to stop M/s Midwest Granites Pvt Ltd alienating the property; petition withdrawn with liberty to approach the competent authority and dismissed as withdrawn, without costs; miscellaneous petitions closed. No precedent cited or discussed.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the competent authority for redressal of the grievance; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, no order as to costs, and miscellaneous petitions closed. ¶35

Paravastu Ramesh Vs State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶35

Issue for consideration

Whether learned counsel for the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the competent authority for redressal of his grievance. +3 more

¶34

Court's answer

Permission was granted to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the competent authority for redressal of his grievance; accordingly the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.

¶35

Ratio / Principle

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition (including IA No.1 of 2025) shall stand closed.

¶36

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (Special Original Jurisdiction) — Writ Petition No.34771 of 2025 — Paravastu Ramesh v. State of Telangana and others (K. Sarath, J., 17-11-2025). The petitioner, proprietor of M/s Bharath Krishna Granites, had prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the 3rd and 4th respondents (District Registrar and Sub Registrar, Mahabubabad) to cancel sale deed No.3664 of 2014, and the 2nd and 5th respondents (Director and Assistant Director, Mines and Geology) to take initiative for cancellation of licences of persons exploiting granite from his land under the guise of false documents; IA No.1 of 2025 (S.151 CPC) sought restraint on the 7th respondent (M/s Midwest Granites Pvt Ltd) alienating the property under that sale deed pending disposal. After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the competent authority, making an endorsement to that effect on the Court bundle. Permission was granted as sought; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs, and miscellaneous petitions pending were ordered to stand closed. No issue on the merits was adjudicated.

¶1

[³³⁰² ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF^NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{K. SARATH}

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO :34771^{OF 2O25}

¶8

Between:

¶9

Paravastu Ramesh, S/o. Late Krishna^{Swamy Age. 63 Years Proprietol} 'M/9. Bharath Krishna Granites R/o.^{Hat No.504, Sai Saiaswathi ApartmentsH.No.12-} 12-164, Rajendra Nagar Seethaphalmandi^{HYDERABAD- 500061}

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

State of Telangana, Rep.^{by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, TG} Secretariat, Hyderabad^{- 500} 022.

¶13

The Director of Mines and Geoloqv,^{DEPARTMENTOF MINES AND} CEOLOCV My Home Sarover^{Pllza,Flal No.203 and204, 2nd Floor,House} No . 5-922, Sliapurwadi ,^{Adarshnagar, SecretariatRoad,Hyderabad,} Telangana-500063.

¶14

ihe District Registrar,^{Mahabubabad District MAHABUBABAD-506102.}

¶15

The Sub Registrar, Mahabubabad^{- 506 102.}

¶16

The Assistant Director,^{Minesand Geology Mahabubabad District} MAHABUBABAD-506^101.

¶17

The Tahsildar, Thorrur Mandal^{THORRUR'506 163.}

¶18

M/s, Midwest Granites^{Pvt Ltd, Officeat. H.No.8-2-68413125 and26 Road} No.12, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad^{- 500 034}

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226^{of the constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiledtherewith,the High court may be} pleased to issue order or orders or writ or^{writs more particularlya writ in the} nature of writ of Mandamus directing^{the 3rd and 4th Respondentto cancel the} sale deed No.3664 o1^{2014 with furtherdirectionto the respondentlike} Respondent No.2 and^{Respondent No.5to take initiative for cancellationof license}

¶21

of those persons who are exploiting the granite from the Petitioner's land under the guise of false documents in the interest of justice.

¶22

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶23

Petition tlnder Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filel in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pending disposal of the Writ Petition, the 7th respondent may be directed not to alienate the scheduled ltroperty under the cover sale deed No 3664 dated 26-03-2014 on the file of SRO, [Vahabubabad that would be potentially create 3rd party interest , in the interest of^justice.

¶24

Counsel for ther Petitioner:SRl M. VENKANNA

¶25

Counsel for ther Respondents No 1,3,4 & 6: GP FOR STAMPS AND

¶26

REGISTRATION

¶27

Counselfor the' Respondents No 2 & 5: GP FOR MINES & GEOLOGY

¶28

Counsel for the Respondent No 7: ---

¶29

The Gourt made the following: ORDER

¶30

¶31

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶32

WRIT No.34771 of 2o25,

¶33

ORDER:

¶34

After arguing for some time, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to approach competent authority for redrcssal ol his grievance and made an endorsement to that effect on the Court bundle.

¶35

2; . Accordingly, permission is granted as sorlght for and the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶36