Disposed¶26

M/s.Spurthi Solutions v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Feb 2025WP/23137/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Spurthi Solutions v. State of Telangana and Director, Institute of Preventive Medicine; Writ Petition No. 23137 of 2019; Telangana High Court at Hyderabad; Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka; decided 19-02-2025; RNA Extraction Kits; claimed non-release of Rs. 14,18,199/- with interest at 18% per annum for supplies from February 2019; Article 226 mandamus; Section 151 CPC application; writ petition closed without adjudication after respondents released payment; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the respondent authorities have released the payment due since February 2019 for the RNA Extraction Kits and that the grievance does not survive, the Court closed the Writ Petition with no costs. ¶26

M/s.Spurthi Solutions Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰⁰ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO:23 137 0F 2019

¶7

Between:

¶8

M/s.Spurthi Solutions. H.No.17-1_3BB/4.1/302, Laxmi Nagar, Saidabad. Hyderabad - 500 0se Rep. by^-iis ij.ii"t"i"j.V""i;6;i*;'H;d;:/ S/o. J.t/ahipal Reddy, aged a6out 2e r"uo^{-- '"'"'"}

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its principal Secretarv to Govt. Health, t/ ed i ca I a n d F a m i I y" We t fa re' O e I a rt m e ; i, S;;";ffii:' il yderabad -50OO22

¶12

2 The Director, lnstitute of preventive Medicine pubric Hearth Labs and Food (Health) Adm inistration, Naraya nguda, HVO"irOrO I SO'O OZS

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Artrcre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more partrcurarry one in the nature of a wril of l\rlandamus decraring the action of second respondent in not rereasing the payment of amount of Rs.14,-r g,1gg/- towards the suppry of the RNA Extraction Kits supplied by petitioner from February 2019 onwards as arbitrary, ilegar and consequenfly direct the second respondent to pay the amount of Rs.14,1g,.rggr to the petitioner with interest at 1g percent per annum from the date of suppry of the RNA Extraction Kits till the date of payment.

¶15

lA NO: 1 oF 2019

¶16

Petition under section 1sl cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the second respondent to pay an amount of Rs.14,1g,1gg^ to the petitioner

¶17

r . '_?s^i*r . .+ 't,

¶18

towards the supply of FINA Extraction Kits forthwith, pending disposr,rl of the above writ petition.

¶19

Counsel for the Petit c'ner: M/S. K V RAJASREE

¶20

Counsel for the Resp,c,ndents: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW

¶21

The Court made the lc [owing: ORDER

¶22

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

¶23

WRIT PETITION No.23137 of 2Ol9

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondept authorities have released the payment that was due since FebruarSr, 2Ol9 for the RNA Extraction Kits supplied by the petitioner. Hence, the grievance does not survive any longer and therefore no further orders may be required.

¶26