Writ petition challenging appointment of a single trustee to a temple was dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated the cause no longer survived for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SpecialOriginal Jurisdiction) .!
WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTHDAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO:.12210 OF 2019
Between:
Koripalli Sreenu, S/o. Chinna Nagulu, aged about 40 years Occ. agriculture, R/o. H No. 1-1 12 Vandhanam Village, Chinthakani Mandal Khamnlam District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RES'.NDENT'
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances staled in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pleased [o rssue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Itrlandamus, questronrng the action of the 3rd respondent Deputy Commissioner of Endowments in appointing the 6th respondent as Single Trustee of theSth respondent temple vide Proc No.A4l161/20't 9, dated 11.02.2019 is illegal and void and opposed to Article 14,19,21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia including the provrsions of Endowments Act and contrary to the earlier Trust Board appointment proceedings No. A4124O112O16, dated 27.O5.2017 and consequently to direct the respondents endowments authorities to appoint the trust board to the5th respondent temple in accordance with law.
,/,/
lA NO:'l OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the c rcumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHighCourt may be pleased to suspend the Operation of the lmpugned Orderpassed by tl-re 3rd respondentvide Proc No. A4116112019, dated 11.02.2019,pending disposalof the abovemainwrit petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MUMMANENI SRINIVASARAO Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 4: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI CH.VENKATRAMA,N Counsel for the Respondent No.5:--
The Court made the following: ORDER
a*-
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAXA
WRIT PETITION No.122lO of 2Ol9
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in
the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
2 Recording the said submission, the Writ
Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed
SD/-S. MALLIKARJUNARAO ISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY'
SECTION OFFICER
To 21 One Two CCs to CC toSRI GP MUFO R IVITVANENI ENDOWMENTS, SRINIVASA RAOHighCou for vocate the StateIoPUCIof Telangana, at Hvderabad. [OUT] J 6,j"'c c i,i"sir Cri vr ru xnr RA IVAN, Ad vocate[oPUC] 4 Two CDCoPies PSK.
GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:1910212025
ORDER
WP.No.12210 of 2019
'dE SIAI
.t1 o
(i
l
JUN 2025 o
(f ol
{t
t t
De SPAT CHrr0
=
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETTTION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
v
t-
ry
Koripalli Sreenu
The State of Telangana, rep by its Prl. Secretary, Endowments Department
The Commissioner, Endowments Department
The Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Warangal Zone
The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Khammam
Sri Ramalingeshwara Swamy Temple, Vandhanam Village
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
