Dismissed

G.Prabhakararao, v. The State of Telangana, Rep. By Prl. Secretary

Telangana HC3 Mar 2025WP/22492/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a Notice of LTR Case under FORM-E concerning Ac. 43-00 of agricultural land in Dammapet Mandal was called repeatedly and no representation appeared for the petitioners. The Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, vacated the interim order granted earlier, and closed pending miscellaneous applications, without costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

G.Prabhakararao, Vs The State of Telangana, Rep. By… — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

a32521

¶3

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY,THE THIRD^{DAY OF MARCH} TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENTYFIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE^{MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA}

¶7

WRIT PETI^{TION NO: 22492OF2015}

¶8

Between:

¶9

G.Prabhakararao,^{S/o. Hanumantharao,age 62 years,}

¶10

G.Venkateswari,^{age 66 years, Wo.G.PanduRangarao @ Rangarao (Died)'}

¶11

G- Venkata Ramarao,^{S/o Venkata Apparao, Age 60 years,}

¶12

G.Kishore, S/o.^{Venkata Apparao,age 57 years,}

¶13

G.U.Jhansi Shoba^{Rani,W/o' U. Ramakrishna,age 49 years,}

¶14

G. Rajendra Prasad,^{S/o. Venkata Apparao,age 52 years,}

¶15

G.Venkata Narasimharao,^{S/o. latePitchaiah, age65 years}

¶16

AllareRl/o.Ranguvarigudem,H/o.Akinepalli,Dammapetfirlandal,Khammam District

¶17

...PETITIONERS

¶18

AND

¶19

The State of Telangana,^{Rep.By Prl. Secretary, Social Welfare Department'} Secretariat, HYderabad.

¶20

The District Collector/Agent^{to Government, Khammam. District, Khammam}

¶21

The Spl. Deputy^{Collector (Tribal Welfare),Oio ITDA, Bhadrachalam'} Khammam District

¶22

The Project Officer,^{ITDA' Bhadrachalam, Khammam District}

¶23

5- The Tahsildar,^{Dammapet, Khammam District,}

¶24

Korsa Gangulu,^{S/o. Venkappa,age 45 years,Fl/o ' fi/larappagudem' H/o} Akinepalli, Dammapet^{[vlandal, Khammam'District}

¶25

...RESPONDENTS

¶26

Petition under Article^{226 of lhe constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavit filed therewith,the HighCourt maybe pleased} to lssue a writ order^{or direction more particularlyone in the natureof writ of} certiorari calling for the^{records connected with Notice of LTR Case No.} 24t2O15DPr issued under^{FORM - E to the petitioners againstthe properties} -to^an extent of Ac. 43-00^{comprised in S Nos' 502, 503, 504'506' 512'513 and62419}

¶27

I I

¶28

,n ,fl

¶29

situated at Al:ineg, illi, Dammapeta lVandal, Khammam Distri<;t anr, quash the same as the same is 1,r., ral. without Jurisdiction, conlia.y't law. vir t;,tiv: of rulings of this i;;-i':'?""T:,;il; 1 ,::iJiffi'"';'^{;;;;;iG'"i'i,,",,."r;,st c,,, i,.-I, ilizr} ,,0

¶30

l.A. NO:'t oF 20 15

¶31

MP. NO : 29051 OF 201s)

¶32

Petitior urrJ:. Siection 151 CpC praying that in the circrrmstances stated in the affidavit fi erl i- ;uooort of tfre petitiJnlif]Jfiig-h Cou.1 mry b ) pteased stav of 1! Irnl"llrgr-o_cc^{rgs pursuant to the notice} Lii Ca.e No ::4/101S.,DpT issled ::d_"i^{FORy"- t= ,,thepetitioners i"ctrdi;;;;;.iur.,on} frcm rhe properties to an extenr of A: a' t0 comprisedin.g Ng., dOi,-iOJ, So< 50{i.512 513 and624t9 Mandar, xnlmmim'o.i,i.t'0" iii,g"d;i"L'i"t ,1tJ:tr"i":t# ll;l];l; ""apeta

¶33

Counsel for the Frr-.titioners: SRl. K MANIKYALA RAO

¶34

Counsel for the Fl-.spc,ndent Nos.1 to 5: Gp FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

¶35

Counsel for the F o:;po ndent No.6: _-

¶36

The Court macle fl-(,following: ORDER

¶37

e}-A X'i-*:-FCt ---t----

¶38

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI^NANDA

¶39

WRIT PETITION No.²²⁴⁹² of^{20 15}

¶40

ORDER:

¶41

No representation on behalf of^{the petitionerwhen the} case was called on 03.02.2025.^{Thoughthe matteris listed} under the caption for dismissal^{on 12.02.2025, yet, therewas no} representation on behalf of^{the petitioner when the case was} called. Even today^{also i.e., 03.03.2025 though the matteris} listed under the caption for^{dismissal, yet, there isno} representation on behalf of^{the petitioner when the case is} called.

¶42

Under these circumstances,^{this. Court is constrained to} dismiss the^present writ^{petition for non-prosecution.}

¶43

Accordingly, the writ^{petition isdismissedfor} non-prosecution. Interinr order^{granted by this Court on} 2L.O7.2OL5, shall stand vacated.^{However,there shall be} no order as to costs.

¶44

As a sequel, the miscellaneous^petitions ,^{if any, pendingin the} Writ Petition shall also stand closed.

¶45

To,

¶46

SD/- K. AMMAJ] ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 1. One CC to SRl. K MANIKYALA RAO Advocate UC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE, High urt for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

¶47

Two CD Copies KKS GJP

¶48

-l-f :-'::]"13: r*-1-1:f -' ?d

0 t

I l i I I

H|GH COl"lRt'

DATED;011103t2025

ORDER

wP.No.2249t2 0f 2015

itrE s re 14-
o
k
q
J
[l 3 lr l\ 2125
I
.a+
*
t
!. )[ St ^. 'Ct gO
+:-:= ';-z

¶56

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON..F,ROSECUTION WITHOUT Cf,SiTS

G.Prabhakararao, v. The State of Telangana, Rep. By Prl. Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

G.Prabhakararao, v. The State of Telangana, Rep. By Prl. Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Koppuravuri Aswini Vs The State of Telangana

Chaganti Sampath S/o Buchaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Muthi Dhanamma, Vs The State of Telangana

M/S. Adya Builders and Developers Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Srinivasa Resorts Ltd. Vs Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited

Maloth Shankar Vs Korra Venkatesh