Petitioner withdrew her Writ Petition and accompanying interim prayer regarding multiple FIRs. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition without costs.
Permission to withdraw granted; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn; No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[31681
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 22215 OF 2025
Between:
Jogula Kavitha, W/o Jogula Naresh, Aged about 40 years, Occ. PM Employee, Fi./o. H. No.. 12-7-138/'1 , Near SLR Apartments, Mettuguda, Secunderabad, Hyderabad, Telangana State.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petltion under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in registering multiple FIR's against the petitioner's husband namely Jogula Naresh which are arising out same set of facts and similar cause of action as being illegal arbitrary and to the contrary of the settled principles of law and consequently direct the respondent's to club and treat all the pending and future registration of FIR's or complaints made by the complainants as one and the same and further to direct the respondents to refrain from registering multiple complaints as against the similar and same set of facts in.
lA NO: 1 OF 2Ct25
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to strictly follow the orderspassed by this Honble Court in WP No.22037 of 2021 and consequently direct the respondents not to register FIR's in respect of the same set of facts indicated in the afore mentioned crimes, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAMAVARAM CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRT JUSTTCE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.22215 OF 2025
ORAL ORDER:
Mr.R.Chandrashekar Reddy, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present
Writ Petition. He had made an endorsement to the said effect on
the bundle.
In the circurnstances of the case, there shall be no order as to
costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending
in the Writ Petition shalI stand closed.
SD/. AHMED ABDULLAH KHAN ISTANT REGI
//TRUE COPYII
/
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BSK *N LS
HIGH COURT
DATED:04.10812025
ORDER
WP.No.222:,15 of 2025
o 1 - , ^.1 .,S
':) :
20 0[i 2W
,/
c3 r,r !'
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
b
g lv'
It,
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jogula Kavitha
The State of Telangana
K. LAKSHMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
