Sankepalli Vimala Vs The State of Telangana

¶1

I

¶2

[³¹⁶⁸ I

¶3

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶4

THURSDAY, THE^{THIRTY FIRST DAYOF JULY} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYFIVE}

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEK.LAKSHMAN}

¶7

WRIT PETITION^{No:225810F 2025}

¶8

Between:

¶9

Dumbala^{Vijender Reddy.S/o LateKondal.} $e-ddV'^{Age^} {5^years'Occ' Xg ii,;rltr t", hlo-ii^{rrmirrgiriVillagea nd Manda I' SuryapetDistrict}

¶10

2 Dumbala Srinivas^{Reddy S/o.LateKondal.} feddy'^{Aqe^} {0^{years Occ'}

¶11

Idiiii,rirr", nlo ritrrJi!iri Village and lrrlandal' Suryapet District

¶12

Dumbala^{lvladhusudanReddy, S/o Late Kondal Reddy'} .N-".11^years'Occ'

¶13

Idii,irlrr"'ntu lliumrrrglr.l Viltage and Mandal' Suryapet District

¶14

...PETITIONERS

¶15

AND

¶16

1 The State of^{Telangana,Rep.its Principal Secretary' Revenue Department'} Secretariat, HYderabad.

¶17

The District^{Collector' SuryapetDistrict'}

¶18

The Revenue^{Divisional Officer, Suryapet, Suryapet District'}

¶19

The Tahsildar,^{Tirumalagiri Mandal, Suryapet District'}

¶20

The Commissioner^{of Police,Suryapet, SuryapetDistrict'}

¶21

The Superintendent^{of Police, Suryapet, SuryapetDistrict'}

¶22

T.TheStationHouseOfficer,TirumalagiriPoliceStation'sirumalagiriMandal' Suryapet District.

¶23

Dumbala Prabhakar^{Reddy,S/o.SwamyReddy,Age.49 years,occ' BuSineSS,} " "n6.riiuirrLgni Vittrge and Mandal' Suryapet District'

¶24

g.DumbalaMahenderReddy,S/oSwamyReddy'Age40years'OccPvt " E.ip-i"v..'nl".iiru imal jgi?i Village a nd ltilandal, Suryapet District

¶25

l0.Dumbala^{Narsi Reddy, S/ol.Venkat Re^ddy, Aggpp,years' Occ Agriculture} '" [6 r,iri*Jagiri vittige and Mandal, Suryapet District

¶26

ll.Dumbala^{Venkat Reddy, S/o Narsi.Reddy'AS9} !^{years'Occ Agriculture} ' ' R/".T,;;.rligiri Villagb and Mandal, Suryapet District

¶27

Dumbala Krishna^{Reddy, S/o.VenkatReddyAqS 64 years'Occ. Agriculture} '- "R/".T';;.;iigiri vittrg,i ,nd Mandal, suryapet District

¶28

.-r-

¶29

Dumbala Madhukar^{Reddy,S/o,KrishnaReddl, Age 401ears, occ. Clerk in} '" il;;#i:;Tr,iirt*rrgir-iViilage and Mandal' Suryapet^District

¶30

,14'KesidiNarsiReddy,S/o,RamReddyAge71y99]rsocc'Agriculture,

¶31

'^- ii7,iT| i r',ir:i r, g i riVi r r, g" a n d tvl a n d dl' siu rva pet D^{istri ct}

¶32

'15. Kesidi Sathi Reddy, S/o.Ram Reddy'^{Age 67 y?{.s-' Occ Agriculture'} '" iii"Ti IJ;;i"gi.iVirr,g" and Mand'al' 5uryapet District

¶33

'16. Kesidi Raii Reddy, S/o Ram Reddy^{Age 65 years Occ Agriculture'} '" iii""ii ;t;i;uiisniVirr,gu^jnd lManbal' Suryapet District

¶34

Kesidi^{Krishna Reddy, S/o Ram Reddy' Age 62 fears'Occ Agriculture'} " iii;il ;- ;;rrgiiiViliag; a nd lvland a l''su ryapet District

¶35

18 Kesidi Ramesh^{Reddy S/o VenkatReddyAg.e 46,vears' Occ Pvt Employee}

¶36

' " i;"Ni;;i;i'y;; R6-i6 i;;"L; iiii)'ir' g"''^{no"ruandlr's u} ryapet^District

¶37

Kesidi^{Karunakar Reddv, S/o Sathi Reddy' AS9 13 ygqrs Occ Clerk}

¶38

'" iii" Thi;*;lrgiii villrg6 ,nd Mandal' suivapet District

¶39

Kesidi^{Shyamsunder Reddy, S/o SathiReddyAge 40 vears OccClerk in} Wine shop^{Rto rnrrumail[i'iViLg"-'"0 trlanaalSury'apetDistrict}

¶40

Kesidi^{Somi Reddy, S/o Raii Reddy' Age 32 year:'Occ Pvt. Employee} '' iii;Ti;;;iirsniVirrrs" iria uanoat' Suryapet District

¶41

Kesidi Somi^{Reddy, S/o.KrishnaReddy.Age 38 years' Occ Plumber'} " iri"'ii i^ilrirgiriVirrrg" and Mandal' Suryapet Distrtct'

¶42

Kesrdi^{Aruna, D/o'Latetr4ohan Reddy,Age 48 years, o-cc'- Clerkin Grocery} '" L;",il d; tii-.rGgoiv'ri'ge and Manial' Suryapet^District'

¶43

...RESPONDENTS

¶44

Petition under^{Article 226 of Ihe Constitutionof lndiapraying that in the} circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court may be} pleased to issue^{an appropriateWrit, Order or direction more particularlyone in} action of^{the No 2 to 7 in not} the nature^{of Writ of Mandamus declaring the} 15.7.2025^{and 28t512025and in} considering^{the petitioners representationdated} not restraining^{the respondentsNo'8 to 23} from illegallY^{inter-feringwith} possession and^{enloyment of the petitioners in Sy No 269'266 ' 24O'235 ' 236'} 237,238.23o,223totallyadmeasuringAc.15-37,1i2gts.,situatedat ThirumalagiriVillageandMandal,SuryapetDistrict'bearingpassbook No.T29220020il4,^{f2g220)20613 and 129220020612 by providingnecessary} aid for Perso n and^{propertyas illegal, arbitrary and contraryto settled principles} of law^and consequently^{direct the respondentsNo 2 to 7 to restrainthe} respondents^{No B to 23 from interferingand obstructingthe petitionerscultivation} in Sy No.269,^{266,240'235,236'237'238'230'223totally admeasuringAc l5-}

¶45

rt:;.

¶46

37 1t2 gls., situated at Thirumalagrri^{Village and Mandal. suryapetDistrict, further} direct the respondents^{No.2 to 7 to removeFlexi/bannererected by the} respondents No.8 to 23 in^{petitionersland in the interest of justice-}

¶47

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶48

Petition under Section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in^{support of the petition, the Highcourtmaybe pleasedto} direct the respondents^{No.2 to 7 hereinto restrainthe respondents No.Bto 23} from interfering and^{illegally alienating the land in Sy.No'269,266, 240, 235' 236'} 237, 238, 230, 223 totally^{admeasuringAc.15-37l/2 gts', situated at} Thirumalagiri Village and^{Mandal, SuryapetDistrict, bearingpass book} No.T292 20020 il 4,^{r 2922002061 3 and r 2922002061 2, be long s to the petitioners} in any manner,^{pursuantto the representationof the petitioners dated151712022} pending disposal of the writ^petition.

¶49

Counsel for the Petitioner^{: SRI K.VEERASWAMY}

¶50

Counsel forthe Respondents^{No.1to4: SRI L.RAVINDER,AGP FOR REVENUE}

¶51

Counsel for the Respondents^{No.sto7:SRI B'SRIDHAR,AGPFOR HOME}

¶52

Counsel for the Respondents^{No.8to23 :}

¶53

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶54

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶55

WRIT PETITION No.22581 OF 2025

¶56

ORAL ORDER:

¶57

IIcard loamed counsel for the petitioners and Mr. L. Ravinder, lcamed Assistant Government Plcadcr for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. i to 4 and also Mr. B. Sridhar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appcaring on behalf of respondent Nos.5 to 7

¶58

Thc petitioners herein are clainring that they are thc absolute owners and possessors of suit schedule properties in O.S. No.2 of 2020 pending on the file of Junior Civil Judge at l hungathurthy They have filed the aforesaid suit against respondent Nos.S to 13 for perpetual ir-rjunction. The trial Courl granted ad interim injunction against the said respondents. Ihe said suit is pending. During subsistence ol said interim iniunction, rcspondent Nos.8 to 23 are interfering u,ith the possession of the petitioners and they are not pcnnitting them to enter into the suit schedule propefty. Therefore. thoy have submitted representations dated 1 5.07.2025 and. 28.05.2025 to respondent Nos.2 to 7 with a request to restrain respondent Nos.S to 23 from interfering rvith their possession over the suit schedule

¶59

2

¶60

Xj-,J W.P. No 22581 ot2025

¶61

properties. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said representations, respondent Nos.2 to 7 did not act upon the same Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent Nos.2 to 7, the petitioners filed the present writ petition.

¶62

Respondent Nos.S to 23 are private parties. If they violate the interim injunction order, thc pctitioners have to take steps ln accordance with the procedure laid down under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. If thcy require police aid, thel' have to file an appropriate application beibre the Court concemed seeking police aid. On obtaining such order, they have to approach the Police Station concemed. But, they cannot approach this Court alleging nonconsideration of the said representations. Therefore, the petitioners are not entitled for any relief, much less the relief sought in the present writ petition. Thus, this writ petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed.

¶63

This writ petition is accordingly dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to take steps in accordance with the procedure laid down under law. In the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶64

.l

¶65

KI,.J W P No 22i81 ol202i

¶66

As a sequel thcreto. miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending itr

¶67

the u,rit petition shall stand closed

¶68

SD/.S. MALLIKARJUNA^RAO A ANT REGISTRAR :\

¶69

//TRUE COPY//