An advocate sought unpaid remuneration as Assistant Government Pleader under a writ of mandamus. Before adjudication, counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3168 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 30718 OF 2024
Between:
Ch Lingamurthy, S/o. Ch. Surya Kantham, Aged about 53 years, Occ ; Advocate, Rl/o. H.No.1-7-1545, Flat No.305, Road No.7, Advocates Colony, Hanumakonda, Warangal, Warangal District, Telangana.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in not releasing the remuneration amount during the tenure period to which the petitioner being worked as Assistant Government Pleader for a sum of Rs.'1 ,'1 6,000/- in words (Rupees One Lakh Sixteen Thousand Only), as illegal, improper, arbitrary, unjust, violative of Advocates' Fees Rules, 1961, violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia consequently direct the Respondents to pay an amount of
Rs.1,16,0001 (Rrrpees One Lakh Sixteen Thousands Orly), with interest at '1 Spercent per annum.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2024
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cir(::umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith pay an amount of Rs. 1,16,000/- in words (Rupees One Lakh Sixteen Thousand Only) with interest at l9oto per annum, pending the disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Gp FOR LAW AND LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : Gp FOR FINANCE AND PLANNING
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5 : Gp FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following ORDER
I
\
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEK.LAKSHMAN
Writ Petition No. 30718 of2024
ORDER
Learned counse[ lorthe petitioner wouldsubmit that the petitioner has subnritteda letter ro the Registrar (Judicial),seekingpennissionof this Courl towithdraw the present writ petition'The same is placedon record.
Inviewofthesaidsubmission,thewritpetitionisdismissedas withdrawn.
Consequently,miscellaneouspetitions,,if any,pendingin this writ
petition, shall standclosed
SD/- N.SRIHARI EPUTYREGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY//
sEcnoNoFFlcER
RS, HighCourt for thefor thethe
SA PVL f+-
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 10812025
(Hf.:;l
'./ / .
.r,.j
!L) 16 SEP 2[25
|.:
l -/t.
/
'.. I
.Da ..,:,,. - ,:
ORDER
WP.No.30718 ot 2024
t
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. (L q ,,
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ch Lingamurthy
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Legal Affairs
The Secretary to Government, State of Telangana, Law (L) Department
The Principal Secretary to State of Telangana, Finance Department
The District Collector, Warangal District at Warangal
The District Revenue Officer and Addl District Magistrate, Warangal
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
