Dismissed¶33

Sri Bogam Kiran v. The state of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary

Telangana HC11 Aug 2025WP/20687/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP 20687 of 2016, High Court for the State of Telangana (Justice N. Tukaramji), dismissed as infructuous on 11-08-2025 without costs. Article 226 writ of mandamus sought against respondent Nos. 2 to 4 for interfering in civil disputes pending between petitioner and respondent No. 5 and supporting respondent No. 5's alleged eviction of petitioner without due process of law; interim Section 151 CPC application (pent house, Rajiv Colony, Mattewada, Warangal District) also closed. Counsel: Kiran Palakurthi (petitioner); R. Laxmikanth Reddy, AGP for Home (respondent Nos. 1-3); none listed for respondent Nos. 4-6. No merits decided, no precedents cited; party names illegible in source.

What did the court decide?

None; writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs. ¶33

Sri Bogam Kiran Vs The state of Telangana, Rep by… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

None; writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs.

¶33

Issue for consideration

Whether the action of respondent Nos. 2 to 4 in interfering in the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent No. 5, and supporting respondent No. 5 in the alleged illegal eviction of the petitioner without due process of law, is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to principles of natural justice.

¶15

Ratio / Principle

Recording the submissions of both learned counsel, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous; no costs.

¶33

Key takeaways

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.ratio¶35

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition No. 20687 of 2016 (High Court for the State of Telangana, Original Jurisdiction; bench: the Honourable Sri Justice N. Tukaramji), order dated 11-08-2025 (Monday). Filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petition sought a writ of mandamus declaring the action of respondent Nos. 2 to 4 - in interfering with civil disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent No. 5, and supporting respondent No. 5 in the petitioner's alleged illegal eviction without due process of law - illegal, arbitrary and contrary to principles of natural justice. An accompanying application under Section 151 CPC sought restraint on respondent No. 3's interference with the petitioner's possession of a pent house at Rajiv Colony, Mattewada, Warangal District, pending disposal of the writ petition. At hearing, Sri Kiran Palakurthi for the petitioner submitted that the cause no longer survived for adjudication and sought dismissal as infructuous; Sri R. Laxmikanth Reddy, Assistant Government Pleader for Home (for respondent Nos. 1 to 3), took no objection. Recording these submissions, the Court dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous without costs and directed that miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, stand closed. No finding was made on the legality of the challenged action; the merits were neither examined nor decided, and no precedent was cited.

¶1

13217^|

¶2

IN THE^{HIGHCOURTfORJHESTATEOF TELANGANA}

¶3

(SPeciii Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶4

MONDAY,THE^{EJ-EVENTHDAY OF AUGUST} "'-TTN'O iTTOUSANO AND TWENW FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEN.TUKARAMJI}

¶7

WRIT PE^{TITIONNO: 20687oF 2016}

¶8

Between:

¶9

:fl ,"""r:1t5l""ii3',fa,ffd3il]%li"fff$.rt3J8'ffih"::lB':tcumPvt

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

;,ri,ffit;1'a*.g,m#$i;Ha'Hffi;,-

¶13

'I"dreil+"#flBfl:,"":a:r;altf^{t8lit?3,1i?;3"""i1[?i:l],9"^,l3;} .fr :1"f,{?:mllrft -,.?ffi:irifuvt?slraseli:il,#-:11'"'n'' Dist

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition^{under Article226 of lhe Constitution of lndiapraying that in the} circumstances^{statedin the affidavit filed therewith'the HQh Court may be} pleased to issue^{a writ, ord€r or directionmoreparticularlyone in the nature of} Writ of mandamus^{declaringthe action of the respondentNo 2 to 4 in interfering} the civil disputes^{pending betweenthe petitionerand respondent No 5 and} supporting^{the respondentNlo} '^{5 in illegally evictingthe Petitioner withoutdue} process of law as illegal'^{arbitrary and principlesof natural iustice}

¶16

l.A. NO: 1 oF 201 MP. NO; oF 2016

¶17

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3'd respondent not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner in Pent House of H No.^,l,-4223t2, Rajiv Colony, Mattewada, Warnagal District without due process of law, pending disposal of Writ petition

¶18

Counsel for the petitioner: SRl. KIRAN PALAKURTHI counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1to3: sRr R. LAXMTKANTH REDDY, AGP FoR HoME counsel for the Respondent Nos.4to6:-

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

¶21

i i \

¶22

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI TUSTICE N'TUKARAMJI}

¶23

I o 20 87 0F²⁰⁶

¶24

o E

¶25

This Vrit^{Petition is filed under Article 226 of C-orstitution} of India^{seeking the following relief/s:-}

¶26

"... to issue a^{writ, orileror directionmore panicularlyone.in} ,h; ;;-.f v;i .f^{rnandamtsdeglar;ry.1actionof the} :#;; i{. . i'to^{+ io interferingthe ci'ildisputes pendi5} l""S1.J iil;il;t d "'poodtl"' N9's .a1d^{supponing the} ;"';J#$:i;;tlt"c"tv'ittiog^{the.Petitione.rwidrout due} ;##;^{il-;itti+'"'t.}'v and principles or natural iustice...^"

¶27

Fleard^{lvlr.Kiran Palakurthi, leamed courselfor the Petitioner} and Mr.Rlaxmiftanth^{Reddn leamed Assistant Government} Pleader for^{Ftrorrr appearingfor respondent Nos'1to 3'}

¶28

Leamed^{coursel for the petitioner submirs that the caue in} this Writ^{petition does not survivefor adudication and seels to} dismiss this^{Vrit Petitionas infructuous'}

¶29

4 LeamedfusistantGovemmentPleadertakesnoobjectionto

¶30

the same.

¶31

¶32

Recording the submissions of both the leamed counsel, this

¶33

Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No cosrs.

¶34

¶35

Miscellaneous^petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. . REKHA RANI T REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 'SEGTION^{OFFICE R} To, I 1 gne qq to SRI K|RAN PALAKURTH|, Advocate loPUcl 2 Two CCs to GP FOR HOME ,High Court foiihJ State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI 3 Two CD Copies LSBM w

t I t !

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 ltOBt2OZs

ORDER

e 1Hf- S14 15
( c
.1<br>a)
ti ,,)1- 24 s[P m6 (
*
.Sna.;',

¶42