Writ petition challenging negative blocking of ITC in the Electronic Credit Ledger was dismissed as infructuous after counsel for the petitioner submitted it had become infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3446 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
WRIT PETITION NO: 18154 OF 2024
Between:
M/s. SRI KRISHNA ENTERPRISES, Sy. No. 854/E, Shutter no. 4, Brindavan Colony, Burgula Village, Farooq Nagar l\rlandal, Telangana. Represented by its Proprietor Mr. Himanshu Joshi.
...PETITIONER
AND
...nesronto=,rrs
Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriale writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the4th respondent in passing the impugned order dated 27- 03- 2024 through which he has confirmed the order of the 2nd respondent in inserting negative blocking ofITC inthe Electronic Credit Ledger as illegal, arbitrary, high handed, without authorityof law andjurisdiction, in violation ofprinciples of naturaljustice contrary tothe
i il
4-isions of the Act and set aside the same and pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Cor.rrt may deem fit and proper in the circumstan(;es of the case as oth erwise the petitioner wil be put to irreparabre loss and hardshi p. IA NO: 10F 2024
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 2nd res pondent to forthwith revoke the negative bl0cking of the Electronic credit Ledger of the petitioner for enabling the petitioner to file its monthly returns pencJing disposal of the Writ petition and to pass such other order or orders as the Hon,ble Court may deem fit and l.rroper in the circumstances of the case as otherwise the petitioners wi, be put to irreparabre loss and hardship.
lA NO: 3 oF 2024
Petition under Section 1 51 cPC praying that in the circums tances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may L)e preased to grant reave to fire additionar affidavit and consider the same as part and parcer of the main writ petition
lA NO: 2 oF 2024
Between:
ri
Mis. Sri Krishna Enterprises, Sy. No. 854/E, Shutter no. 4, Brindavan Colony, Burgula Village, Farooq Nagar Mandal, Telangana. Represented by its Proprietor Mr. Himanshu Joshi.
..,RESPONDENT/WRIT PET]TIONER
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 23-07-2O24 in WP No. 18154 ot 2024 and dismiss the above reterred Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. V. BHASKAR REDDY SENIOR COUNSEL REP SRI V. S]DDHARTH REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI T. SANJAY REDDY, SENIOR COUNSEL The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL '
AND
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YAR-A,,
EIRIT PETITION No. 18154 OF 2024,'
ORDER: (Per tti:L? Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujog Paul)
Sri V.Bhaskar Reddy, learned Senior Counsel al.)pearing for Sri V.Siddharth Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that this Writ Petition has rendered infructuous
Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also starrd closed
SD/.L.LAKSHMI BABU Y REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ,,':" F i1 ',,j sec'rtott oFFtcER U
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:1310212025
ORDER
WP.No.18154 o12024
rI
Ii
]]'.,.
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
tllad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Sri Krishna Enterprises, represented by its Proprietor Mr. Himanshu Joshi
The Superintendent of Central Tax, Shad Nagar CGST Range
The Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Shad Nagar CGST Range
The Superintendent of Central Tax (Anti Evasion), Ranga Reddy GST Commissionerate
The Additional Commissioner (Appeals-I), O/o. The Commissioner of Customs and Central Tax, Hyderabad Commissionerate
The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, Ranga Reddy GST Commissionerate
Sujoy Paul
Renuka Yara
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
