Jahangir Shareef Vs The State of Telangana

Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent filed against the order Dated 03/10/2023^passed in writ^petition No²⁷²¹⁵ of^{2021 on the file of theHigh} Court.

¶10

Between:

¶11

,J

¶12

'1 . Jahangir Shareef, S/o Late Azizullah Shareef, Aged about 43 years, Occ. Employee, Rl/o H.No. 9-4-611N6, Meraj Colony, Tolichowki, Hyderabad

¶13

Shaheen Begum, D/o Late Azizullah Shareef, Aged about 30^{years, Occ.} Housewife, R/o H.No. S-4-611N6, Meraj Colony, Tolichowki, Hyderabad

¶14

Asra Bequm, D/o Late Azizullah Shareef, Aged about 29^years,Occ. Housewife, Fi/o H.No. 9-4-611N6, Meraj Colony, Tolichowki, Hyderabad^Rep. by their GPA, Syed Lateef, S/o Syed Qamar Masood, aged 44^years,Fl/o H.No. 20-7-37311 and B, Fateh Darwaja, Hyderabad

¶15

...APPELLANTS

¶16

AND

¶17

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,^Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶18

The Special Tribunal, (Constituted under the Telangana^{Rights in Landand} Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2020) Ranga Reddy District,^{Rep. by its Member-} District Collector, Ranga Reddy

¶19

The Tahsildar, Farooqnagar Mandal, Ranga^{Reddy District}

¶20

B.Padma, Wo Narender Reddy, Aged. Major,^{Occ. Business,}

¶21

B.Narender Reddy, S/o Buchi Reddy, Aged^{. Major, Occ. Business, Managing} Director, B.N.R.Township Pvt Ltd

¶22

B.Pentya, , S/o Lachya, Aged Major, Occ. Agriculture^{(Died per LR R10)}

¶23

B.Dharna Dass, S/o Hanmanthu, Aged. Major,^{Occ. Agriculture(Died per LR} R11)

¶24

B.Ramulu, S/oPandu, Aged Major,^{Occ.Govt. Employee,}

¶25

(R-4 to R-8 ate Fl/o Kamsanpally Village, Faroocinagar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District(Presently RR District)

¶26

I Mazharullah Shareef, S/o Late Azizullah Shareef Agerd about 35 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o H.No. 9-4-61 ,1N6, Meraj Colony, Tolichowki, Hyderabad

¶27

10.B.Narsing @ B.Narsimlu, S/o Late Pentya, Aged . Major, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o Kamsanpally Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Formerly Mahabubnagar District, Now Ranga Reddy District

¶28

11 . B.Shankar, S/o LateB.Dharma Das, Aged Major, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Kamsanpally Village,Farooqinagar Mandal, Formerly Mahabubnagar District, Now Ranga Reddy District

¶29

l2.Smt.Badavath Bharathi, W/o Ramulu,Aged about 42 7,s2,., Occ. House Wife, Rl/o H.No. 5-5-1135, Plot No 2511 , Sainath Colony, Rcad No. 5, Opp. Vishnu Theatre, Vanasthalipuram, Hayathnagar, Ranga Reddy - 500 070

¶30

R12 is impleaded as per C.O. dt. 03.10.2023 in lA No. 1 of 2022

¶31

...RESPONDENTS

¶32

lA NO: 2 OF 2025

¶33

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstancS€ stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cc,urt may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent (Tahsildar Farooqnagar) not to entertain any requests for registration of documents or for changes in Record of Rights, relating to the land an extent of Ac.12.00 Gts in Sy.No. 66 and an extL.nt of Ac.12.10 Gts in Sy.No. 69 of Kamsanpally Village, Farooqnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District pending the present Writ Appeal.

¶34

lA NO: 3 OF 2025

¶35

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the, circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pteased to suspend the regularization proceedings issued by the 3rd Respondent in file Nos. 8/5882/06, dt. 15.03.2008, pertaining to the Petitioners land an extent of Ac.12.00 Gts in Sy.No. 66 and an extent ot Ac.12.10 Gts in Sy.No. 69 of Kamsanpally Village. Farooqnagar Mandal, Ranga ReCdy District and any consequential proceed ing s/action, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal.

¶36

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI P.ROY REDDY

¶37

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: SRI MURALIDHAR REDDY KATRAM, GP FOR REVENUE

¶38

Counsel forthe Respondent No.8 & 12: SRI C.RAGHU, Sr. COUNSEL, REp. FOR SRI R.GIRI KUMAR

¶39

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶40

I I

¶41

THE HON,BLE^{THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL}

¶42

AND

¶43

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE^{RENUKA YARA}

¶44

UIRIT APPEAL No.1 0F²⁰²⁵

¶45

JUDGMENT:^(Per the Hon'ble^{thb Acting Chief Justice Sujog Paul)}

¶46

Sri P.Roy Reddy,^{learned counsel appearingforthe} appellants, Sri Muratidhar^{ReddyKatram, learned Government} Pleader for Revenue^{appearing for respondentNos'l to 3 and} Sri C.Raghu, learned^{Senior Counsel appearingfor} Sri R.Giri Kumar,^{learned counsel appearingfor respondent?{os'S} and 12.

¶47

With the consent, frnallY^heard.

¶48

During the course^{of hearing, learned counselfor the parties} reached to a consensus.^{It is agreedthat the impugned order} before the Writ Court dated^{17.06.2O21passedby the Special} Tribunal, Ranga Reddy^{District, is withoutassigning} any reasons and therefore, the^{said order dated 17.06.2021may} be set aside for not assigning^{reasonsand the matter may be} restored on the frle of learned^{SpecialTribunal,Ranga Reddy} District with a direction^{to the Special Tribunal to decide the} revision,in accordance^with law.^{The partiesagreed to appear} before the Special Tribunal on^{27 .O2.2O25at 11.30 AM' For this}

¶49

2

¶50

purpose, no separate notice will be required to be issu.ed. The Tribunal shall rehear the parties ald pass a fresh order, in accordarrce with law. Any finding given by the learnr:d Single Judge in WP.No,27215 of 2O2l on merits will not be binding on the Tribunal. The Tribunal shail decide the matter on its own merits.

¶51

With the aJoresaid observations, the Writ Appeal is disposed of, rvithout expressing any opinion on flre meril.s of the .* case. No costs.

¶52

Interlocut.ry applications, if any pending, shall a-lso stand

¶53

closed.

¶54

SD/.K. SHYLESHI D R //TRUE COPY// R

¶55

To,

¶56

'1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

¶57

The Member^- District Collector,^{Special Tribunal, (Constitutedunderthe} Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar^{Pass Books Act, 2020) Ranga Reddy} District.

¶58