Multiplex Association of India Vs Gorla Bharat Raj

Z Sumendar Reddy, Shareholder^{of PVR-INOX Cinemas Age 33.Occ', Manager} Finance and Aicounts S/o^{RajiReddy, RJo Flq! No. 101,Mahadev s rvs} avenue, Power Nagar,^{Kukatpally Hyderabad- 500018}

¶13

...LEAVE PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS

¶14

AND

¶15

1 Satish Kamaal, S/o.^{K. Ramulu 7'89, Santhinagar Colony, ChandaNagar,} Ranga Reddy District,^{Telangana 500050}

¶16

...RESPONDENT/WRIT^PETITIONER

¶17

2 The State of Telangana,^{Rep by its Principal Secretary,Home(General -A)} Department. Dr B F^{Ambedkar'Telangana State SecretariatHyderaDad} 500022

¶18

3 The Telanoana State^{Film/Television and TheatreDevelopment,corporation,} idp ey it.-Minaging^{Director,1o-2-1, FDCComplex, A'C' Guards'} Hyderabad 500028.

¶19

' Sri Venkateswara ru;;lr;;;iaotonv,^{Creations, Plot} sri Naqar Colonv, Hvderabad, 500073 Rep' bv^{No' 132 and133, B-2-2931K1133'} its Foundei'V. Venkaia^Ramana Reddy^{(alias Dil Raju)}

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

lA NO: 2 OF 2025

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumr;tances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma y be pleased to suspend the lmpuoned Order dated 2410112025 in W. P. No.'l 184 of 2025 and pending the disposal of the present Writ Appeal

¶23

Counsel for the Appellants: SRI S. NIRANJAN REDDY REP., FOR Ms. RUBAINA S KHATOON

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI MD SULTANA BASHA

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI MAHESH RAJE Gp FOR HOME

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: --

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI PASHAM MOHITH

¶28

^trRlT APPEAL NO: 190 OF 2 o25

¶29

Writ Appeal under c;lause^'1 5 of the Letters Patent Preferred Against Order Dated 2410112025 Passerl :r WP No^'1 184 of 2025 on the file of the High Court

¶30

Between:

¶31

1 It4u_ltiplex Ass,rciation of lndia Federation House, Tanseng lVarg, New Delhi - .1 10001 Rep hry V Kiran Kumar

¶32

2 Sumendar Flecdy, Shareholder of PVR-INOX Cinemas Age. l:i3 Occ. l,4anager Finance and Accounts S/o RajiReddy, Rl/o Flat No^- i O 1 ,l,,lahadevs^"rvs avenue, Power Nagar, Kukatpally Hyderabad- 500018

¶33

...LEAVE PETITIONERSiAPPELLANTS

¶34

AND

¶35

1 Satish Kamaal. S/o. K. Ramulu 7-89, Santhinagar Colony, Ch;tnda Nagar, Ranga Redc y t)istrict, Telangana 500050

¶36

...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER

¶37

The State of Terlangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary. Ho.re (General -A) Department, Dr B R Ambedkar Telangana State Secretariat Hyderabad 500022

¶38

2 The Telang.ana State Film/Television and Theatre Developmert, Corporation, Rep By.its MqlqgilO Director, 10-2-1,FDC Complex, A.C. Guaids, Hyderabad 50C028.

¶39

4 fvl/s. Mythri l,4ovie lt/akers LLp, plot No 58,3rd Floor, Road No.72, Aswini Layout, Journalirt 99]g!V, Jubitee Hills, Hyderabad, Telanganra, SOOO:3 Rep. oy rts lJirectc,r <avt Shankar yalamanchili

¶40

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶41

lA NO: 2 OF 2025

¶42

Petition under section 151 CPC^{praying that in the circumstances stated in} the affidavit filed in support of^{the petition,the High Court maybe pleased to} suspend the impugned order dated^{24.01.2025 in WP 33923 of 2024' in the} interest of^justice

¶43

Counsel for the Appellants:^{SRI S.} NIRANJAN REDDY REP., FOR Ms. RUBAINA S KHATOON

¶44

Counsel for the Respondent^No.1: SRI M. SULTAN BASHA REP., FOR SRI P SRINIVASA REDDY

¶45

Counsel for the Respondent^No.2: SRI MAHESH RAJE GP FOR HOME

¶46

Counsel for the Respondent^No.3:

¶47

Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI K. SIDDHARTH RAO I

¶48

WRIT APPEAL NO:^'191 OF²⁰²⁵

¶49

writ Appeal under clause^{15 of the Letters Patent PreferredAgainst order Dated} 24101t2025 Passed in WP No^{1184 of 2025on the file of the High Court'}

¶50

Between:

¶51

1 Multiplex Association of lndia,^{Federation House'Tanseng.lVlarg,New Delhi -} '1 10001 Rep by V Kiran Kumar

¶52

2 Sumendar Reddy, Shareholder^{of PVR-INOX CinemasAge.33.Occ' f\ilanager} Finance and Aicounts S/o^{RajiReddy, Fl/o Flat No. 101 ,lVahadev' s rvs} avenue, Power Nagar,^{Kukatpally Hyderabad-5000'18}

¶53

...LEAVE PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS

¶54

AND

¶55

1 Gorla Bharat Raj, S/o Gorla^{Chandra Shekar A-24l1 , Lab Qrts, Kanchanbagh} Hyderabad, 500058

¶56

...RESPONDENT/WRIT^PETITIONER

¶57

2 The State of Telangana,^{Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home (General -A)} Oepartment, Or A H nmbeOkarielangana^{State SecretariatHyderabad} 500022

¶58

? Commissioner of^{Police, Rep by Hyderabad CityPolice(Cinemaslicensing} ^ nrii,iiiitvi, o)" Commissioner^{oi pcitice, Tower-A,lcccBuilding, Road No '12'} Banjara-Hills, Hyderabad, 500034.

¶59

4 Sri Venkateswara Creations, Plot^{No. 132 and 133,8-2-2931K1133,Kamalapuri} Colonv. S;iNaqar Colonv' Hvderabad,^{500073 Rep by its Founder V'} Venka'ti Ramana Reddv^(alias Dil^Raju)

¶60

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶61

lA NO: 2 OF 2l2ai

¶62

Petition unCer Section 15'1 CpC praying that in the circumr;tances stated in the affidavit filed ir support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the lmpugned Order dated 24lO1t2O2S in W.p.No..1 189 of 2025 and pending the disposa of the present Writ Appeal

¶63

Counsel for the Appellant: SRt A. VENKATESH REp., FOR Ms. ttUBAtNA S KHATOON

¶64

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI MAHESH MAMINDLA

¶65

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI MAHESH RAJE Gp FOR HOME

¶66

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: --

¶67

Counsel for the Respondent NO.4: SRI PASHAM MOHITH

¶68

WRIT APPEAL NO: 1 92 0F 2025

¶69

writ Appeal under clause^'15 of the Letters patent preferred agains. the order dated 2410112025 passed rn W.P.No. 37007 of 2024 on the file of the Hioh Court.

¶70

Between:

¶71

1 M.u]!ple1 Ass,r:iation of lndia, Federation House, Tanseng Ivlarg, New Delhi _ 110001 Rep L,y V Kiran Kumar

¶72

2 P,iT:i^drll"dpy,^{Sharehotder of pVR-tNOX Cinemas Age-33 Occ- Manager} r-rnance an,l Accounts S/o RajiReddy, R/o Flat trto_ I Ot tt/ahadevs "rvs avenue, Power Nagar, Kukatpally Hydeiabad_ 500018

¶73

AND

¶74

...LEAVE PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS

¶75

1 lr,4allanglSai :.qV_ tg9OV, S/o lVallangi Vivekananda Reddy ptot No. 31, Road ry-or^{/br Upp './ 5 Office.Jubilee Hills, Shaikpet,} Hyderabdd, Telangana^_ 500033

¶76

...RESPONDENTA/VRIT pETTTIONER

¶77

2 The State of lelangana, Rep by_its principal Secretary, Home (General _A) Department, nr a R Rmbedkar feiangini Stite beir6tariat H y'derabad^'' 500022

¶78

3 commissioner rf Police, Rep by Hyderabad city porice (cinerras Licensino Al$glrty), 9,q ,lommissioner^{oi pirrice, Tower-A,rCcCAuirJi,is.n-oal r.roiz,} Eanjara Ht s, Hyderabad, 500034.

¶79

4 Qhikkadpally^{Police Station,} Rep by. Station House Officer, CF:4V plus FFV, 500020chikkadb^pa,i 6 st, .rawa rrar r-isii, Hn;r;i;;s;;, Hvll"ii ur,t, T6ffg;";'

¶80

5 Sandhya Theatre, 35 A/M, Rep by. Cinemas License Hotder. F.TC X Rd, opp. Pgy^qrglli^{Restaurant, Zamistdnpirr,Himiyalnag;r,} iyjerabac , fetangai5"' 500020

¶81

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶82

lA NO: 2 OF 2025

¶83

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleased to} suspend the impugned order dated^{2410112025in WP 37007 of 2024, in the} interest of^justice

¶84

Counsel for the Appellant: SRI A.^{VENKATESH REP., FOR Ms. RUBAINA S} KHATOON

¶85

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.1 : SRI R VIJAY GOPAL. T}

¶86

Counsel for the Respondent^{No.2 to 4: SRI MAHESH RAJEGP FOR HOME}

¶87

Counsel forthe Respondent No.5: SRI^{G ARUN KUMAR}

¶88

Tle Court made the following: COMMON^JUDGMENT

¶89

'1. ,t'

¶90

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJoY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA

¶91

WRIT APPEAL Nos.189 190 LgL &, 192 oI 2o25

¶92

COMMON J_UIGIEENI (Per the Hon'ble tlrc Acting Chief Ju';tice Sujog Paul)'.

¶93

Sri Si. Niranjan Reddy, learned Senibr Coursel represents Ms. Rubaina S Khatoon, learned counsel for the appellants 1n W.A.Nos.189 & 19O of 2025; Sri A. Venkatesh, I earned Senior Counsel represents Ms. Rubajna S Khatoon, learnrrd counsel for the appellarts in W.A.Nos.19i & 192 of 2025; Sri M. Sultan Basha, r Iearned co,l,rsel for respondent No.1 in W.A.No.189 of 2O25; Sri M. Sultan Ba,sha, learned counsel represents Sri P. S rinivas Reddy, learned cctrrrsel for respondent No. 1 in W.A.No.l9O of 2025; Sri Mahes;t Raje, learned Government Pleader 1or Home, for responclen - NIo.2 in all the writ appeals and Sri K. Siiddharth Rao, learned counsel for respondent No.4 in W.A.No.19O ol' 2025

¶94

2 Matters, being similar, were heard analogously.

¶95

Afler arguing for some time, learned Senior Oounsel for the appellants seek to withdraw these appeals rvith iiberty to frle application s for impleadment and vacating the^,stay order in pending wrr t petitions with further liberty to mention the writ petitions beit,re the learned Single Judge for hearing on vacate stay application s,

¶96

The other side has no objection.

¶97

i1

¶98

2

¶99

This Court has no doubt, if after frling applications for impleadment and vacate stay petitions, mentioned memos are prayed for seeking out of turn listing, learned Single Judge will look into it expeditiously.

¶100