Dismissed¶¶28

G.Rajesh Goud, v. The District Collector (Pw), Yadadri

Telangana HC28 Jan 2025WP/17490/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: infructuous writ petition; suspension of Panchayat Secretary Grade-II; Thangadapally/Tangadpally Gram Panchayat, Choutuppal Mandal; Yadadri-Bhuvanagiri District; District Collector (PW); Proceedings No.17412017-B(Pts) dt.16-5-2017; Article 226; Articles 14 and 16; Section 151 CPC; WP No.17490 of 2017; Telangana High Court; dismissed as infructuous; no costs; no merits decided; limited precedential value.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous, miscellaneous applications were closed and there was no order as to costs. ¶¶28

G.Rajesh Goud, Vs The District Collector (Pw)… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE TWENry EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTH]K

¶6

WRIT PETIT]ON NO: 17490 OF 2017

¶7

Between:

¶8

G.Rajesh Goud, S/o: Sattaiah, Aged about 40 Years, Occ: Panchayat Secretary Grade-ll, 0/o Gram Panchayat Tangadpally, Choutuppal Marxial, Yadadri, Bhuvanagiri District.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The District Collector (PW), Yadadri, Bhuvanagiri District.

¶12

The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Mandal Parishad Choutuppal, Yadadri, Bhuvanagiri District.

¶13

The District Panchayat Officer, Yadadri, Bhuvanagiri District.

¶14

The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj & Rural Employment, Telangana State, Urdugally Lane, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad.

¶15

The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department, Telangana Secretariat at Hyderabad.

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue, a Writ, Order or Orders more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Proceedings No.17412O17-B(Pts) dt.16-5201 7 issued by the 1't respondenl in placing the petitioner under suspension as illegal, without jurisdiction, null and void and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service as Panchayat Secretary Grade-ll of Thangadapally Gram Panchayat, Choutuppal (M) with all consequential benefits, by holding the action of the respondents in placing the petitioner under suspension Vide Procs,dt.16-5-2017 without jurisdiction and non

¶18

application of mind is as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and subversive of Articles 1 4,1 6 of the Constitution of lndia.

¶19

l.A. NO:'l oF 2017(WP MP. NO: 21360 OF 20171

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in to service as Panchayat Secretary Grade-ll, of Thangadapally Gram Panchayat, Choutuppal (M) by suspending the operation of the impugned Proceedings No.17412O17-B(Pts) dt.16-5-2017 issued by the 1"t respondent.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH. JAGANNATHA RAO

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 5: cP FOR SERVICES ll Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: SRt G. NARENDER REDDY

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶24

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA XARTHIK

¶25

trI.P.No.17490 of 2Ol7

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

Today, when the matter is called, Ms.Vakil Manjula, representing the learned counsel for petitioner Sri Ch.Jagannatha Rao submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructous.

¶28

In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infrucutous. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶29

//TRUE COPY//

¶30

SD/.P.CH.NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR CTION OFFICER

¶31

To, 1. One CC to Sri CH.^{Jagannatha Rao, Advocate} [OPUC] - - 2. Two CCs to GP for^{Se-rvices ll, High Court for the State of Telangana, at} Hyderabad [OUT] 3. Ohe CC to Sri G.-Narender^Reddy,SC [OPUCI 4. Two CD CoPies TJ BSK

8^ta-

HIGH COURT

DATED:2810112025

ORDER

WP.No.17490 ot 2017