Dismissed¶¶44

M.Sanjeev Reddy, v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC1 Sept 2025WP/13293/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quashing of FIR; FIR No. 98/2017 dated 10.04.2017; Asifnagar Police Station, Hyderabad; writ of certiorari; Article 226 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC stay of proceedings/arrest; final report filed stating complaint civil in nature; no representation by petitioners; writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; High Court for the State of Telangana; Justice J. Sreenivas Rao; decided 01-09-2025.

What did the court decide?

As the investigating officer had filed a final report stating that the complaint is civil in nature, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive. ¶¶42

M.Sanjeev Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰³¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH^{COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶3

MONDAY, THE FIRST^{DAYOF SEPTEN/BER} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICEJ. SREENIVAS RAO}

¶6

WRIT PETIT^{ION NO:132930F 2017}

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 M sanieev^{Reddy, S/o. M. RamanarsimhaRgldy' Age.d about 68 years'Occ} itrrilJ..",'il"-^{tiN-olZ-Z-q 27O, rtat No 101, PriyaColony, Gudimalkapur'} Mehdipatnam,^HYderabad.

¶9

2 ft/. Narender^{Reddy,S/o. Late RAmanarasimhaReddy' Aged about 61 years} o."'Er-.ir"..,'^{Ci'' I z-z-aizjao eriya Colony,Gud imalkapur'Mehdipatnam'} Hyderabad.

¶10

3 1r,4. Hanumanth^{Reddy,S/o Late Ramanarsimha Reddy' Aoed about59 years'} " ls, - opposite ''Sh-ivalayam Temple'

¶11

occ Business,^{R/olz--i'izsii} Gudimalkapur,^{Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad'}

¶12

4 Goda Viiava,,^{W/o, GodaVenkateshwarlu Goud,Agedaboul 42 yq3rs.occ} t,lJii..i"'iir.''ie-o-+Zsliis^{-uiiJ N'sa', Gudimalkapur'Mehdipatnam'} Hyderabad.

¶13

.....PETITIONERS

¶14

AND

¶15

The State^{of Telangana,Rep by its Principal Secretary Home Department'} Secretariat^{Buildings, Hyderabad'}

¶16

The Assistant^{Commissionerof Police,Asifnagar' Hyderabad'}

¶17

The Station^{House Officer, Asifnagar Police station, Asifnagar, Hyderabad'}

¶18

4.Smt-V'Navnitha,Wo'V.satishKumarJaiswal'Agedabout33.years,OccHousewife, nlo.^{H r"lo: ti-ds-iiz,ri*'n, Kulsum-pura'Hyderabad'}

¶19

..,..RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition Under^{Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filed therewith'the High Court may be} pleased to issue^{a Writ order or direction' more particularlyone in the natureof} Writ of Certiorari'^{to call for the recordspertainingto the crime in FIR No 98/2017} dated-10.04'20lTonthefileofthe3rdrespondentpolicestationandtoquash the same^{and consequently direct the 3rd respondentnot to arrest the petitioner}

¶21

in pursuance of^{the FIR No. 98/2017, dated- 10 04.2017 cr the file of the 3rd} respondent Police^station

¶22

l.A.NO:2 OF^{2017WPMP. NO} 16494 0F 2017

¶23

PetitionUndersection'l5lCPCprayingthatinthecir:rmstancesstatedIn the affidavit^{filedin supportof the petition, the High Court r.r rbe pleased to stay} all further^{proceedings including arrestof the petitioners ln sspect' of Crime in} FlRNoSBl2OlTDl.lO042OlTonthefileofthe3rdresprrclentpolicestation pending disposal of^{the abovewrit petition'}

¶24

Counsel for the^{Petitioners : SRIK'V'RAGHUVEER}

¶25

Counsel for^{the RespondentNos.1to 3 : GP FORHOME}

¶26

Counsel for^{the RespondentNo'4 : Ms' RADHIKA' ADVOC'\ iE FOR SRI} SURESH SHIV^SAGAR

¶27

The Court made^{the followingORDER}

, t

I I

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶32

IIRIT PETITION No.13293 OF 2017

¶33

ORDER:

¶34

This Writ Petition has been fi1ed with the following relief

(

(

"lssue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the naturc of Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records pertaining to the crime in FiR No.98 of 2O l7 ciatcd 1O.O4.2017 on the file of 3.d respondent police station and to quash the same and consequently drrect the 3'd respondent not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of the FIR No.98 of 2017, dated lO.O4.2O17 on the file of 3'd respondent police station."

¶39

No representation on behalf of the petitioner either in physical mode or virtual mode.

¶40

Ms. Radhika, learned Counsel representing Mr. Suresh Shiv Sagar, learned Counsel for respondent No.4 is present.

¶41

Mr. B. Sridhar, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3 submits that the investigating ofhcer alter conducting investigation hled final report stating that the nature of the complaint is civil in nature

¶42

In view of the same, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive.

¶43

¶44

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed a infructuous

¶45

No costs

¶46

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendir! in thc Writ

¶47

Petition, shall stand closed.

¶48

SD/-S. Nr^{I-LIKARJUNARAO} ASSIⁱ TANT^REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

sEcrtou oFFlcER

elangana^AT

Two CCs to^{GP FORHOME, HighCourt for the State o} Hvderabad [OUT] ) ol,L-cCi" sRt r v^{RncHUVEER, AdvocatetoPqQL} 3 o;; aa io snr^{SunesHSHIV SAGAR, Advocate[OF'tJ)} 4 Two CD CoPies

SA BS ail-

HIGH^COURT

DATED:01^lDgl2025

ti-r Sl..iii.. -
).
oC
2 [18 2llii

I

¶62

ORDER

¶63

WP.No.13293^{of 2017}