Dismissed¶25

Jalagari Sham Raj v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC21 Aug 2025WP/12898/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

unilateral cancellation of registered deed; cancellation Deed No. 1912010 dated 29.12.2009; S.R.O. Gandipet; Stamps and Registration Department, Telangana; writ of certiorari; Article 226 Constitution of India; Thota Ganga Laxmi ALT SC(2012) 350; dismissal for non-prosecution; counsel without instructions; Ranga Reddy District; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications closed.

What did the court decide?

None; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs and pending miscellaneous applications closed. ¶25

Jalagari Sham Raj Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰² ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 12898 OF 2024

¶7

Betwee n:

¶8

Jalagari Sham Raj, S/o J. Venkatesham, Aged about 51 years, Occ Business. R/o H. No. 13-5-565, Karwan Malai Matt, Hyderabad.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Princrpal Secretary Stamps and Registration, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

2 The Commissioner and lnspector General of Stamps and Registration, Nampally, Hyderabad.

¶13

3 The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy District.

¶14

4 The Sub-Registrar, Gandipet, Ranga Reddy Dist.

¶15

5 B. Papi Reddy, S/o Late lt4alla Reddy, Aged about 79 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o Bodupally Village, Uppal L/andal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶16

6 B. Sathi Reddy, S/o Late ftrlalla Reddy, Aged about 85 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o Bodupally Village, Uppal Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutron of lndia tdtfl,?],'iEnT: circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ calling for records pedaining to registered cancellation Deed No. 1912010, daled 2911212009 registered at S.R.O. Gandipet and quash the same as abuse of process of law as unilateral cancellation is not correct and valid under the law and liable to be set aside as per the settled Law of the Honourable Apex Court Judgment squarely covered in Thota Ganga Laxmi case ALT SC(2012) 350.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI D.MANIKYALA RAO

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents No.'tto4 : GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION -- Counsel for the Respondents No.5&6 : The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

¶21

¶22

THII HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶23

WRIT PETITIOI{ No.12898 of 2O24

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Today, r.r,hcn thc nrattci is taken up lor hearing, learned corrnsel appe:rring lor tl-re petitioner submits that he has no instructions fi-om ttre petitioner 1o pursue the matter fLrthcr. In vicu' of '.he same, he is unabie to proceed further u,ith the mattcr. It see ms that the petitioner is not intcrestecl to prosecute this case. 2. In vir:q ol tlrc surl;rnission made bv the iearned counsel appearing lor the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed lor Non-prosecution. Thcre shall bc no orcler as to costs

¶26