G. Sathyanarayana Vs The State of Telangana

1 . Banuru Raghupathi, S/o. Bhanoor^{Kistaiah,Agedabou-t} .^{33 Years, Occ} Asriculture, Rt/o. D. No. 1-9s^{(Old No. 6-70), XIiO"*"-VirhgL, cJiin"r,eru} Mandal, Sanga Reddy^{(Medak) District.}

¶11

Bhanoor Sandeep Kumar, S/o.^{Bhanoor Narsimhulu,Ag-edabout 3q} -YeqR' Occ. Agriculture,'Ri/o. D.^{No. 1-96,KardanurVillage, Patancheru Mandal,} Sanga Reddy (Medak) District.

¶12

...PETITIONERS

¶13

AND

¶14

The State of Telangana, Rep.^{by its Principal Secretary, Revenue} Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶15

The District Collector, Sanga^{Reddy District,Sanga Reddy}

¶16

The Tahsildar, Patancheru^{Mandal, Sanga Reddy District.}

¶17

The Village Revenue Officer,^{Office of the Tahsildar, Patancheru Mandal,} Sanga Reddy (Medak) District.

¶18

The Panchayath Secretary,^{Kardanur Gram Panchayath, Kardanur village,} Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy^District.

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226^{of lhe Constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiled therewith'the High Court maybe} pteased to issue a writ, or direction more^{pafticularlyone in the nature of writ of} Mandamus declaring the action of^{the 4th Respondentin threatening to} dispossess the^petitioners from^{their propertyadmeasuring 101 2 Sq. Feet having} Door No. 1-95^(Old No.^{6-70) situatedin Sy. No. 1 0 of KardanurVillage'} Patancheru Mandal, Sanga^{Reddy (Medak) District withoutany noticeand} following of due^process of^{law as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutionaland}

¶21

consequently direct the respondents No. 3 to 5 not to disl r ssess the petitioners from their peaceful possession ofthe property admeasuring⁽⁾¹² Sq. Feet having Door No. 1-95 (OId No. 6-70) situated in Sy. No. 10 )l .Kardanur Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District.

¶22

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r :umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cor. r may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 3 to 5 not to dispossess the ltditioners from their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property admer rr u,ring 101 2 Sq. Feet having Door No. 1-95 (OId No. 6-70) situated in Sy. No.^'1 ) of Kardanur Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District pendir; rlisposal of the Writ petition before this Honble court.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.M.SWAMULU

¶25

Counsel for the Respondents No.1to4: AGP FOR REVENUE

¶26

Counsel for the Respondents No.S : SRI G.NARENDER RE t OY, SC FOR GP

¶27

W.P.No.'|2256 OF 2021

¶28

Between:

¶29

G. Sathyanarayana, S/o. Gouri Yadaiah, Aged about 42 Y,* rs, Occ. Agriculture R/o. D. No.^'t-bgt2, Kardanur Village,^pitaricfieru lr,tdnd;t, li rida-R"oov'tnr"iirrj District.

¶30

...PETITIONER

¶31

AND

¶32

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary l:venue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶33

2 The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District, Sanga Ret c y 3 The Tahsildar, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy Distri ;

¶34

4, The Village Revenue Officer, ffice of the Tahsildar, Pa.i rrcheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) Dstrict.

¶35

The Panchayath Secretary, Kardanur Gram Panchayatt , h.ardanur village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy District.

¶36

...RESPONDENTS

¶37

. ...,,1

¶38

:j t I I I I ! ! I i I I il i I I I ii i

¶39

// '/.,/

¶40

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affklavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more pa(icularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the^zt{h and 5th Respondents in threatening to dispossess the petitioners from their property admeasuring Ac. 0.03 1/3 having Door No. 1-99/2 situated in Sy. No. 10 of Kardanur Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) Distr'rct without any notice and following of due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents No. 4 and 5 not to interfere/d ispossess the petitioners from their peaceful possession of the property admeasuring Ac. 0.03 1/3 Guntas having Door No.^'l -99/2 situated in Sy. No. 10 of Kardanur Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District.

¶41

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶42

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 4 and 5 not to interfere/d ispossess the petitioners from their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property admeasuring Ac. 0.03 1/3 Guntas having Door No.^'l-99/2 situated in Sy. No. 10 of Kardanur Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Honble court.

¶43

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI G.M.SWAMULU

¶44

Counsel for the Respondents No.1to4: AGP FOR REVENUE

¶45

Counsel forthe Respondents No.5 : SRI G.NARENOER REDDY, SC FOR GP

¶46

W.P.No.'|6673 OF 2021

¶47

Between:

¶48

Gouri Mallaiah, S/o. Eraiah, Aged 54 Years, Occ. Agriculture, Residents of Kardanoor Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy District.

¶49

Gouri Yadaiah, S/o. Eraiah, Aged about 60 Years, occ. Agriculture, Resklents of Kardanoor Village, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy District.

¶50

Bhanoor Kistaiah, S/o. MaHaiah, Aged about 54 Years, Occ. Private Service, Residents of Kardanoor Village, Patancheru lvlandal, Sanga Reddy District.

¶51

...PETITIONERS

¶52

AND

¶53

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its principal Secretary levenue uepartment, Secretariat, HyiJeribad.

¶54

2 The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District, Sanga Rer < y.

¶55

3 The Tahsildar, patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy Distri ;

¶56

4 The Village Revenue Officer, ffice of the Tahsildar, pa i rcheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District.

¶57

The Panchayath Secretarv. Kardanur Gram panchayat, (ardanur village, patancheru lvtandat, Sang:d Reddy Disarict.'

¶58

The Station House Officer. BDL Bhanoor police Station, F €rtancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) Dist.

¶59

Gulam Mohammed Sateem S/o. Lqle Gulam Murtuza, t S 2d 71years, occ. Pensioner, R/o. Ka rda noor Vilrs., i;d;ffi r I = i nsa Reddy District

¶60

"i.ii'tiii,E

¶61

,..RESPONDENTS

¶62

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indii praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the - 1rh court may be pleased to issue a writ, or direction more particurarry one in t o nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the respondent No. 4 to 6 i r interfere with the peaceful possession and enjsyrnsnt of the petitioners tcuse site property admeasuring 0.03 1/3 Cents each in Sy. No. .t 0 of Kardanur \ illage, pat ancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District on the instigation r1. 6th res pondent without following due process of law. as illegal, arbitrary, E r c unconst itutional and consequen'y direct the respondents No. 4 to 6 not to ir r:rfere/dispossess the petitioners from their peaceful possession of the proper y ;:dmeasuring Ac. 0.03 1/3 Guntas of each situated in Sy. No. 10 of Kardanur / llage, patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District.

¶63

lA r{o: 1 oF 2021

¶64

Petition under Section 151 CpC praying that in the cir; lrnstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court I e y be pleased to direct the respondents No. 4 to 6 not to interfere/dispossess t I r petitioners from their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property adn r e suring Ac. 0,03 1/3 Guntas of each situated in Sy. No. 10 of Kardanur V ll tge, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District pending disposat ot he Writ petition before this Honourable court

,i

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

Between:

Gulam Molqmmed Saleem,. S/o._ Late .Gulam Murtuza, ASed 71 years. Occ. Pensioner, Rl/o. Kardanoor Viitage, paG;ct e, Mffi;i, b;gl'ftldoy'oili#i "*

¶69

...PETITIONERS/R.7

¶70

AND

¶71

1 Gouri Mallaiah, S/o. Eraiah, Aged 54 years, Occ. Agricutture,

¶72

Gouri Yadaiah, S/o. Eraiah, Aged about 60 years, occ. Agricutture,

¶73

Bhanoor Kistaiah, s/o. Maflaiah, Aged about 54 years, occ. private service, Al!,i::.^{**""nts of KardanoorVifiage, patancheruMandat,SangaReddy}

¶74

...RESPONDE NTS/PETITIONERS

¶75

The State of Telanoana Rep.. by. its.principal Secretary, I I LvrrY i vvvr vr! Revenue Depa rtment, Secreia riat, Hvbeiioi?.

¶76

The District Collector, Sanga Reddy District, Sanga Reddy.

¶77

The Tahsildar, Patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy District.

¶78

The Village Reygnue Offrcer, Office of the Tahsildar, patancheru Mandal, Sanga Reddy (Medak) District

¶79

7 The Panchayath Secretary, Kardanur Gram panchayath, Kardanur village, Patancheru Mandal, Sangia Reddy Districi.

¶80

The Station House officer,_ BDL Bhanoor porice Station, patancheru Mandar, Sanga Reddy (Medak) Dist.

¶81

...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS

¶82

Petition under Section i 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to vacate the interim orders passed in r.A.No.1 of 2021 in w.p.No.16673 of 2021 , dated 27-07-2021.

¶83

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.M.SWAMULU

¶84

Counsel for the Respondents No.{to4: AGp FOR REVENUE

¶85

Counsel for the Respondents No.5 : SRI G.NARENDER REDDY, SC FOR Gp

¶86

Counsel for the Respondents No.6 : Gp FOR HOME

¶87

Counsel for the Respondents No.7 :

¶88

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

¶89

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ]I,ISARATH WRIT PETITION Nos. 1(X)91 L2256 16( 73 of2O2L

¶90

COMMON ORDER:

¶91

These petitions are coming for hearir 51 since 202 1. On 27.IO.2O25 when the matters were call( < , there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the matters were directed to be listed under I .r: caption "for Dismissal". Even today, when the matte rs were called, there is no representation. It seems that he petitioners are not interested to prosecute these cases.

¶92