Writ petition seeking protection from dispossession of patta land without notice was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33021
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION :5121 OF 2O22
Between:
Smt Banavath Shanthi, Wo late Balvanth Lakshmi naik Age 52yrs R/o 17-1388/F/81, purnodaya colony, Saidabad, Hyderabad, Telangana
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the Respondent No.3 and No.4 here in trying to dispossess thepetitioner from hispatta land i.e. Sy.no 65812lA to an extent of 5.1O GTS; in Sy,no 658/A to extent of 5 GTS, . Sy.no 65812lA to an extent ot Ac2.2O Gts situated at Kadthal Village, Kadthal Mandal Mahabubnagar District without issuing any notices to thispetitioner as illegal and arbitrary, in violation of Right to Prope(y Guranteed under Article 300/A in the constitution of lndia opposed to the establishedprinciples of law further isin violation further is in principles of naturaljustice and consequently directing the
respondent to followdue process of Iaw and such other order as this Hourable deems fit ancl orderin circumstance of case in the interest of justice'
lA NO: I OF :2022
petitiorr under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed insupportof the petition, the High Gourt may be pleased to direct the respondentnot to interfereand dispossessthe petitioner as the 3rd and 4th respondent aremarkingthe patta lands i.e Sy.no 65812lA to an extent of 5.10 GTS, in sy.no 658/Ato extent of 5 GTS, Sy.no 65812l{to an extent of Ac 2.20 Gts situated at KadthalVillage, Kadthal Mandal MahabubnagarDistrict pending disposal in circumstanceof the case in the interest of Justice.
COUNSEI fOr IhEPEtitiONET: SRI A.B.LALITHAGAYATHRI counsel for the RespondentsNo.1to3: GP FOR REVENUE
Gounsel for the RespondentsNo.4 :
The Court m;rde thefollowing:ORDER
I
THE HONOURABLESRI JT'STICE K.SARATH
IIIRIT PEIITIONNo.S L2 1 of 2022
ORDER:
This petition is comingfor hearing since 2022. On 13.LO.2O25, when thematter was cal|ed, there was no representation onbehalf of the petitioner,therefore,the matter was directedto be listed under the caption "for Dismissal". Even today,when the matter is called, there is no representation. Itseems that the petitioner is not interested toprosecute this case.
Writ Petition shall alsostand closed.
SD'. P.C.SULEKHADEVI ASSISTANT
i:
//TRUE COPY/'
OFFICER
To,
BSK
PSK
?$r4..
HIGH COURT
DATED =07l,1112025
f
THE S i4
( e
C)
r'-)
? 7 r[8 2026 t'.
t
')"
.{- *
ORDER
WP.No.!i121 of 2022
DISMIS$ING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOLIT COSTS
fiti, eel-\uL
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt Banavath Shanthi
State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary (Revenue Dept)
The District Collector, GHMC, Mahabubnagar
Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukuru, Mahabubnagar District
Tahasildar, Kadthal Mandal, Mahabubnagar District
National Highway Authority of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highway
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
