Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Shyamlal Singh Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

Home
Telangana HC
2025
Shyamlal Singh Vs The State of TelanganaShyamlal Singh v. The State of Telangana

Dismissed¶26

Shyamlal Singh v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC24 Feb 2025WP/10243/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, W.P. No. 10243 of 2019, decided 24.02.2025 by Justice Nagesh Bheemapaka — Shyamlal Singh v. State of Telangana (Endowments Dept.) & others incl. Sri Murali Manohar Swamy Temple, Kishan Bagh, Hyderabad. Writ petition under Article 226 concerning alleged interference with possession of premises No.19-5-2911 with 790 sq. mtrs. land, invoking the Telangana Charitable, Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act 1987; interim application under Section 151 CPC. Dismissed for non-prosecution (petitioner absent on 19.02.2025 and 24.02.2025, listed 'for dismissal'); misc. applications closed; no costs. Useful only as a non-prosecution disposal; no ruling on merits; no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner, having made no representation on 19.02.2025 and again on 24.02.2025 when the matter was listed under the caption 'for dismissal', appears not interested in pursuing the writ petition; therefore the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, with no costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Issue for consideration

Whether the action of the respondents in interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of premises bearing No.19-5-2911 with appurtenant land admeasuring 790 sq. mtrs., situated at Kishan Bagh, Hyderabad, is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the Telangana Charitable, Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act 1987, and whether respondents 2 to 4 should be restrained from dispossessing the petitioner. (Raised but not adjudicated; petition dismissed for non-prosecution.)

Ratio / Principle

The petitioner, having made no representation on 19.02.2025 and again on 24.02.2025 when the matter was listed under the caption 'for dismissal', appears not interested in pursuing the writ petition; therefore the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, with no costs.

Key takeaways

In consequence of the dismissal, all miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in the writ petition shall stand closed.ratio¶28

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition (Article 226) by Shyamlal Singh against the State of Telangana (Endowments Department), its Commissioner and Assistant Commissioner, and Sri Murali Manohar Swamy Temple, challenging alleged interference with his peaceful possession and enjoyment of premises bearing No.19-5-2911 with appurtenant land admeasuring 790 sq. mtrs. at Kishan Bagh, Hyderabad, and seeking a restraint on dispossession — DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION: the petitioner was unrepresented when the matter was heard on 19.02.2025 and again on 24.02.2025 when it stood listed under the caption 'for dismissal'; the Court found the petitioner not interested in pursuing the petition; miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed; no costs. The merits of the challenge were not adjudicated.

A

[³³⁰⁰ ]

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD ,

:ii IVONDAY, THE TWENITY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY . TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE^'

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

WRIT PETITION NO: 10243 OF 2019

Between:

Shyamlal Singh, S/o Late Jamuna Singh Aged about 68 ydars, Occ - Business Rt/o H.No.'19-5-2911 , Kishan Bagh, Hyderabad.

...PET|T!ONER AND

'1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Endowments Dept., Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad

The Commissioner, Government of Telangana Endowments Department Boggulakunta, Hyderabad, T.S.

The Asst. Commissioner, Endowments Department, Hyderabad District Boggulakunta, Hyderabad.

Sri Murali Manohar Swamy Temple, Kishan Bagh, Hyderabad Rep. by its Executive Officer

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in interfering into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respept of the premises bearihg No.'t 9-5-2911 with appurtenant land admeasuring 790 sq. mtrs., situated at Kishan Bagh, Hyderabad, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and vilative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of Telangana Charitable, Hindu Religious lnstitutions and Endowments Act 1987, consequen y direct the respondents 2 lo 4 not to dispossess the petitioner over the above said premises. :

,l

IANO:1OF 201e

petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in iupport of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the resporrdents z tl + not to dispossess the petitioner irega,y. in respect of the premises bearing No.19_5_2gl1 with appu(enant lan situared at Kishan Bash, Hyderabad, pendins oi.po.i::ff,';",,#re0 sq. mtrs.,

F;E3.1+i'the^{Petitioner:sRr sRrNrvASAMuRrHy} cHEEDELLA (Nor Counsel for the Respondent Nos-l TO 3: Gp FOR ENDOWMENTS uounsel for the Respondent No.4: _

The Court made the foilowing: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI .IUSTICE NAGESH^BHEEMAPAKA

trIRIT PETITION No. 1O243 of^2O19

ORDER:

When the matter was taken up for^hearingon 19.02.2025, there was no representation^{on behalfof} petitioner, hence, it was directed to^{be listed on 24 -O2 -2025} under the caption 'for dismissal'.^{Eventoday, there is no} representation on behalf^{of petitioner.}

It appears that petitioner is not^interestedin pursuing this writ Petition.

Therefore, the Writ Petition is^{dismissed for non-} prosecution. No costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous^{applications pending,if}

any, in the writ petition,^{shall stand closed.} I SD/- P.Ch.

SD/- P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA S TANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To 1. One CC to^{SRI SRINIVASA MURTHY CHEEDELLA'} vocate [OPUC] i il; ccriJeF^{ron ENDowMENTS,Hish court forth} e State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] 3 Two CD CoPies PSK. GJP W

HIGH COURt'

DATED:2410212025

ORDER

WP.No.10243 ot 2019

'c
o
tn!U(i ',r c'
:j: -D
^ T/:H
.._-.--

DrsMrssrNc THE WRIT PETIT|ON FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS

6.deq'"'\k"

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the action of the respondents in interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of premises bearing No.19-5-2911 with appurtenant land admeasuring 790 sq. mtrs., situated at Kishan Bagh, Hyderabad, is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the Telangana Charitable, Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act 1987, and whether respondents 2 to 4 should be restrained from dispossessing the petitioner. (Raised but not adjudicated; petition dismissed for non-prosecution.)¶15

Statutes considered

3 provisions across 3 enactments

AI extract

Constitution of IndiaArticle 226¶15
Telangana Charitable, Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987Telangana Charitable, Hindu Religious lnstitutions and Endowments Act 1987¶15
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908Section 151¶18

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Alleged action of the respondents in interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of premises bearing No.19-5-2911 with appurtenant land admeasuring 790 sq. mtrs., situated at Kishan Bagh, Hyderabad; no specific order, forum or date is identified in the record.¶15
Prior proceeding
Interim application I.A.No.1 of 2019 filed under Section 151 CPC praying that respondents 2 to 4 be directed not to dispossess the petitioner in respect of the said premises pending disposal of the writ petition.¶18
Prior proceeding
On 19.02.2025, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.¶24
Prior proceeding
The matter was directed to be listed on 24-02-2025 under the caption 'for dismissal'; even on that date there was no representation for the petitioner.¶24

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Shyamlal Singh¶8
SRI SRINIVASA MURTHY CHEEDELLA
respondent
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Endowments Dept., Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad¶10
GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
respondent
The Commissioner, Government of Telangana Endowments Department Boggulakunta, Hyderabad, T.S.¶11
GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
respondent
The Asst. Commissioner, Endowments Department, Hyderabad District Boggulakunta, Hyderabad.¶12
GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
respondent
Sri Murali Manohar Swamy Temple, Kishan Bagh, Hyderabad Rep. by its Executive Officer¶13

Coram

AI extract

Nagesh Bheemapakaauthor¶5

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Telangana HC
Decided on: 24 Feb 2025 · February
Registered: 8 May 2019
Case no.: WP/10243/2019
CNR: HBHC010194252019
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: Nagesh Bheemapaka
Disposal: DISMISSED AS NON PROSECUTION
Case type: WRIT PETITION

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Nagesh Bheemapaka

Kaki Laxmaiah Vs The State of Telangana
21 Feb 2025
M/s. M.K.Man Power Suppliers, Vs The District Collector/Chairman
21 Feb 2025
Islavath. Somla Vs State of Telangana
21 Feb 2025
Mohd Lateef Khan Vs The State of Telangana
24 Feb 2025
Vijay Gopal Vs State of Telangana
24 Feb 2025
Telangana Govt. Madhyana Bojana Vanta Karmikula Sangam, Vs The State of Telangana
24 Feb 2025

Cite this judgement

Shyamlal Singh v. The State of Telangana, WP/10243/2019 (TEL), decided on 24 February 2025.

The High Court for the State of Telangana publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes3

Constitution of IndiaArticle 226
Telangana Charitable, Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987Telangana Charitable, Hindu Religious lnstitutions and Endowments Act 1987
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908Section 151

View all statutes

Procedural history4

Alleged action of the respondents in interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of premises bearing No.19-5-2911 with appurtenant land admeasuring 790 sq. mtrs., situated at Kishan Bagh, Hyderabad; no specific order, forum or date is identified in the record.
Interim application I.A.No.1 of 2019 filed under Section 151 CPC praying that respondents 2 to 4 be directed not to dispossess the petitioner in respect of the said premises pending disposal of the writ petition.
On 19.02.2025, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Nagesh Bheemapaka

Parties & counsel