Writ petition by two manpower suppliers challenging outsourcing allotment proceedings for work at NIMS, Bibinagar. Counsel submitted the cause did not survive for adjudication; the High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, without costs, closing pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33001
i I i 1 ! i ,I I I i I i r
i t' l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 38900 OF 2014
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...BESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitutionof lndiqprayingthat in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit frled therewith, theHigh Court may be pleased to issue a Wrrt, Order or d irection more in the natil-rq ofWrit of Mandamus declaring the actionof the 15t respondentin issuingthe impugned proceedings bearing Lr.No.A2l Outsourcingi2l l2ol4 dated- 241Q.2o14as void, illegal, arbitrary, unconstitu tional andcontrary to Government orders issued from time to time and consequentlydirect the 1st respondent to foltoWthe procedure prescribed by the Government for allotment of work for supply ofManpoweron outsourcing basis to work inNlttrlS,UniversityCampus,Rangapur,Bibinagar,
Nalgonda District by issuingTenderand pass such other and further ordersas this Honble Court may deem fit andproper in the circumstances of the case-
l.A. NO: 'l OF 201 MP. NO: 4a733 0F 2014
Petition under: section 151 CPCprayingthatin the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed iQgupport of thepetition' the High Court maybe pleasedto stay of all furtherprqqeedilgspursuant tothe impugned proceedings bearing Lr. No.A2lOutqo urcingt 2l !201 4 daled24.1 Q.2014 of theI st respondent
Counsel for the Pqtltionef : SBIS.JAGADISH
Counsel for tlre Rgsponqent l,,lo.1&2: GP FORLABOUR
Counsel for the Respon{gnt No.3 : SRIG.ANANDAM(SCFOR NIMS)
counsel for the ReqponCent No. 4:
The court mqde the follqrwing; ORDER
n
! I I t I t I i! j i E F at E II
HON'BLE SRIJUSTICENAGESH BHEEMAPAIIA WRIT PETITION No.389OO of2014
ORDER:
When the matterhas been taken upfor hearing, learnedcounsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in thepresent writ petitiondoes not survive for adjudicationand it has becomeinfructuous'
as infructuous.No costs.
pending, if any, inthis Writ Petition,shall standclosed'
SD/. SRI N. RAJAGOPAL DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To,
BSK
SSVt.
\ (
HIGH COURT
DATED:2110212025
ORDER
WP.No.38900 of 2014
1 HE S fA 16.
I
+
-) ($
,-)
o 27Jul.l m zoD
* -a+
Dr,t.^rC !r€O I
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
.aLcP('+ Yr6F}5
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. M.K.Man Power Suppliers
M/s. Alpha Swayamshakthr Sangam
The District Collector/Chairman, District Outsourcing Committee, Nalgonda
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Labour, Employment and Training Dept.
The Director, NIMS, State of Telangana
M/s. M.G.R. Enterprises and Consultancy
Nagesh Bheemapaka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
