Dismissed¶24

Koppula Murali Rami Reddy v. Kanamathareddy Venkateswara Reddy

Telangana HC14 Oct 2025CRP/6025/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, Hyderabad; CRP No.6025 of 2018; Koppula Murali Ramr Reddy (petitioner/J.Dr.-Deft.) v. Kanamathareddy Venkateswara Reddy (respondent/D.Hr.-Pltff.); Article 227 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; execution petition EP No.4/2017 in OS No.18/2012; 1st Additional District Judge, Khammam; order dated 14-12-2017; dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; decided 14-10-2025 by Justice Narsing Rao Nandikonda; counsel: lmmaneni Rama Rao (petitioner), P.V.L.Bhanu Prakash (respondents).

What did the court decide?

Recording the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner that E.P.No.4 of 2017 stands closed and nothing survives in the civil revision petition, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous, with no order as to costs. ¶24

Koppula Murali Rami Reddy Vs Kanamathareddy… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³⁴⁴³ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 6025 OF 2018

¶7

Petition Under Article 227 ot lhe constitution of lndia against the Order dated 1411212017 Passed in EP No.4/2017 in OS No.18112012 on the file of the Court of the 1st Additional District Judge, Khammam.

¶8

Between :

¶9

Koppula Murali Ramr Reddy, S/o,Krishna Reddy, 52 yrs, Occ Agriculture, r/o. Beerapalli village, Vemsur Mandal, Khammam District.

¶10

.. Petitioner/J.Dr.-Deft

¶11

ANO

¶12

Kanamathareddy Venkateswara Reddy, S/o.Anji Reddy, 46 yrs., OccAgriculture, R/o. Beerapalli village,Vemsur Mandal, Khammam District.

¶13

... RespondenUD.Hr.-Pltff

¶14

lA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶15

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the EP No.4 ol 2017 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Khammam for the present.

¶16

IA NO: oF 2018

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in EP No.4 of 2017 in OS No.18'1 of 2012 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Khammam pending disposal of the main CRP.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri lmmaneni Rama Rao

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents : P.V.L.Bhanu Prakash

¶20

The Court made the following : ORDER

¶21

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO ]IANDIKONDA CML REVISION PETITION No.6o2li of 2O18

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

When the matter is taken up for heanr-rg. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that E.P.No.4 of^'2 - l7 itself'has been closed as such nothing survives in the^pres e nt civil revision petition further adjudication and has become^jr liuctuous.

¶24

Recording the aforesaid submissions ol I: trned counsel fbr the petitioner, civil revision petition is dismisse :l as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶25

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pe: Jing if any, shall

¶26

stand closed

¶27

SD/-AH;GOWRI SHANKAR
ASSi STANT REGISTRAR

¶28

¶29

I
'.
//TRUE COPY//
,SECTION OFFICER
j

¶30

¶31