The court dismissed civil revision petitions as infructuous upon the petitioner's submission that the main original petition had been dismissed.
Petitions dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[34431
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
crvlL REvlsro N PETITION NO: 1728. 1692 & 1698 OF 2021
clvlL REVISION PETITIoN xOilZZE !E2021
Petition under Article 227 ot the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the orders dated 2510112021passed in lA.No.174l2020 in OP.No.734l2O16 on the file of the Court of Judge, Additional Family Court, Hyderabad.
Between:
Rajaji Marapattla, S/o. Late Yesudanam Marapattla, Aged about 40years, Occ. Government employee, Residing at D.No.5-1, Church Backside street, Peddaamiram, Bhimavaram, presently at Tadepalligudem, West Godavari Dishict
...PETITIONER
AND
Sanjeevi Vutchula, Wo. Rajaji Marapaftla, Aged about 35years, Occ. Housewife, Presently residing at Flat No.202, Plot No.44-A, Road No.'l1, Film Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 096
...RESPONOENT
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. J PRABHAKAR
Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED
2
CIVIL REVISION PETI TION NO: 1692 OF 2021
Petition unrler Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the orders dated 2510' 12021 passed in 1A.No.17312020 in OP.No.73412016 on the file of the Court of Judge, Additional Family Court, Hyderabad.
Between:
lajajiMarapattla, s/o late YesudanamMarapattla,aged about40 years,occ. Government employee,residing at D.No.5-1, Church- Backside street,Peddaamiram, Bhimavaram, presently at Tadepalligudem,west Godavari District
...PETITIONER
AND
9anjeeviVutchula,Wo Rajaji Marapattla, aged about35 years,Occ. Housewife, presently residing at Flat No.202, Plot No.44-A, Road No.1 1, Film Nagar,Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 096
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt. J PRABHAKAR
Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED
ION PETITION NO: 1698 OF 2021
Petition unoer Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the orders dated 2510112021 passed in lA.No.17212020 in OP for No.73412016 on the fite of the Court of Judge, Additional Family Court, Hyderabad.
Between:
lajajiMarapattla,s/o Late Yesudanam Marapatfla, Aged about 40 years, occ.r3overnment Employee, Residing at D.No.5-1, church Backside Street, Peddaamiram, Bhimavaram, Presently at Tadepalligudem, west Godavari Distric:t.
...PETITIONER
AND
9anje,:vi-Vutchula,Wo Rajaji Marapattla, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Houserwife,.prese.nfly. residing a! Flat No.202-, plot No.44-A, Rodo No.1 1, Film Nagar, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 096.
...RESPONDENT
3
lA NO: I OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OP.No.734l2O16 on the file of Judge, Add!.Family Court at Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. J PRABHAKAR
Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICT NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA CML REVISION PETITION Nos.1728.1692 e 1698 ol2O2l
COMMON ORDER:
Whr:n the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the p,etitioner submits that the main O.P was dismissed and in view of the same, cause in the present revision petitions does not surrive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall
stand closed.
SD/. A. SREE}IIVASA REDDY
ASS! IANT REGISTRAR
,/TRUE COPYT'
s TION OFFICER
To,
t6.
TPIVABK
\
Il
r".
IHE S
o
1 1 ll B ?an
*
t
3
o a 3 o O n T
l)
q
dJ
\b
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petitions survive adjudication when the main O.P. has been dismissed?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajaji Marapattla
Sanjeevi Vutchula
Narsing Rao NANDIKONDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
